Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15925569

Crossmodal object-based attention: auditory objects affect visual processing.

Massimo Turatto·Veronica Mazza·Carlo Umiltà
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

According to the object-based view, visual attention can be deployed to "objects" or perceptual units, regardless of spatial locations. Recently, however, the notion of object has also been extended to the auditory domain, with some authors suggesting possible interactions between visual and auditory objects. Here we show that task-irrelevant auditory objects may affect the deployment of visual attention, providing evidence that crossmodal links can also occur at an object-based level. Hence, in addition to the well documented control of visual objects over what we hear, our findings demonstrate that, in some cases, auditory objects can affect visual processing.

Explore related subjects

AffectAttentionHumansReaction TimeSpace PerceptionVisual PerceptionJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Massimo Turatto, Veronica Mazza, Carlo Umiltà. 2005. Crossmodal object-based attention: auditory objects affect visual processing.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.12.001

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

The five-factor model of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale II: a ten-fold cross-validation of a revised model.

OBJECTIVE: The lack of fit of 25 previously published five-factor models for the PANSS items, can be due to the statistics used. The purpose of this study was to use a 'new' statistical method to develop and confirm an improved five-factor model. The improved model is both complex and stable. Complex means that symptoms can have multiple factor loadings, because they have multiple causes, not because they are ill defined. Stable means that the complex structure is found repeatedly in validations. METHODS: A ten-fold cross-validation (10 CV) was applied on a large data set (N = 5769) to achieve an improved factor model for the PANSS items. The advantages of 10 CV are minimal effect of sample characteristics and the ability to investigate the stability of items loading on multiple factors. RESULTS: The results show that twenty-five items contributed to the same factor all ten validations with one item showing a consistent loading on two factors. Three items were contributing to the same factor nine out of ten validations, and two items were contributing to the same factor six to eight times. The resulting five-factor model covers all thirty items of the PANSS, subdivided in the factors: positive symptoms, negative symptoms, disorganization, excitement, and emotional distress. The five-factor model has a satisfactory goodness-of-fit (Comparative Fit Index = .905; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = .052). CONCLUSIONS: The five-factor model developed in this study is an improvement above previously published models as it represents a complex factor model and is more stable.

Affect↗
PubMed2006

A cognitive neuroscience perspective on psychopathy: evidence for paralimbic system dysfunction.

Psychopathy is a complex personality disorder that includes interpersonal and affective traits such as glibness, lack of empathy, guilt or remorse, shallow affect, and irresponsibility, and behavioral characteristics such as impulsivity, poor behavioral control, and promiscuity. Much is known about the assessment of psychopathy; however, relatively little is understood about the relevant brain disturbances. The present review integrates data from studies of behavioral and cognitive changes associated with focal brain lesions or insults and results from psychophysiology, cognitive psychology and cognitive and affective neuroscience in health and psychopathy. The review illustrates that the brain regions implicated in psychopathy include the orbital frontal cortex, insula, anterior and posterior cingulate, amygdala, parahippocampal gyrus, and anterior superior temporal gyrus. The relevant functional neuroanatomy of psychopathy thus includes limbic and paralimbic structures that may be collectively termed 'the paralimbic system'. The paralimbic system dysfunction model of psychopathy is discussed as it relates to the extant literature on psychopathy.

Affect↗