Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 1585422

Immunomodulators: current and future development and application.

Abstract

It has been amply demonstrated that immunomodulators have a place in the armamentarium with other therapeutic modalities for the treatment of various diseases. They presently are, and in the future will be, most effective in preventing diseases which cause, or are the result of, immunodeficiencies. For future development the biological agents that are potent immunomodulators can be more purified and their molecular structures defined and synthesized, such as muramyldipeptides are products of BCG, etc. The active moiety of Picibanil (OK 432), a very powerful immunostimulator should be defined. Further investigations in isolating and characterizing biological agents as immunomodulators should continue in view of the success that has been achieved with BCG in treating superficial transitional cell bladder carcinoma. This mode of treatment is much less toxic to the patient than treatment with the cytotoxic agents thiotepa, mitomycin C. Chemically defined immunomodulators have been used successfully when combined with other therapeutic modalities. Levamisole and its additive therapeutic effect when combined with 5-FU in the treatment of Stage C colorectal carcinoma establishes the potential usefulness of chemicals which specifically augment the immuno response. The explosive growth of cytokine research has led to many technical advances which were key to give cloning and the availability of recombinant cytokines which have extended and modified our concepts of cytokines. The capability of cloning to provide considerable quantities of pure cytokines, permitted studies of immunological, physiological, and therapeutic roles of cytokines. All three classes of immunomodulators: biologicals; chemical; and cytokines will continue to play a major role in advancing and improving the quality of treatment of several of human as well as animal diseases.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M A Chirigos. 1992. Immunomodulators: current and future development and application.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1585422/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

IL-12, as an adjuvant, promotes a T helper 1 cell, but does not suppress a T helper 2 cell recall response.

IL-12 is a potent inducer of NK and cytolytic T cell activity, IFN-gamma production, and T cell proliferation, and is necessary for differentiation of naive T cells to the Th1 subset. We have previously shown that IL-12 promotes a primary Th1 response and suppresses a primary Th2 response in lymph nodes of mice primed with a model hapten-protein conjugate, 2,4,6-trinitrophenyl (TNP)-keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH). We have now extended these studies to determine the Th phenotype of the recall response following immunization with soluble Ag and IL-12. For these experiments, mice were primed with TNP-KLH with or without treatment with IL-12, allowed to progress beyond the primary immune response, and challenged by i.p. injection of TNP-KLH. The phenotype of the recall response was monitored by measuring ex vivo production of IFN-gamma and IL-4 in Ag-stimulated lymph node and spleen cell cultures. Titer and isotype of TNP-specific serum Abs were also evaluated. Mice primed with Ag+IL-12 developed a Th1 recall response, as detected by KLH-specific IFN-gamma production from cultured spleen cells and the presence of TNP-specific IgG2a Ab in serum. However, they also developed an Ag-specific Th2 recall response, as characterized by Ag-induced IL-4 production from spleen cells and the presence of high titers of anti-TNP IgG1 in the serum. Studies of the cytokine profile during the primary response revealed that IL-12 induced in spleen cells the capacity to express both IL-4 and IFN-gamma. CD4+ T cells are necessary for production of IL-4 in the spleens of IL-12-treated mice, and most likely account for the Th2 recall response detected in mice primed with Ag+IL-12. These results indicate that the Th1 phenotype induced by immunization with IL-12 and Ag is maintained so that a Th1 recall response is expressed upon subsequent challenge with Ag. However, immunization with IL-12 also supports the development of a Th2 recall response, indicating that the Th1-inducing effect of IL-12 in vivo is not accompanied by a long lasting suppression of Th2 development.

Adjuvants, Immunologic

C3d of complement as a molecular adjuvant: bridging innate and acquired immunity.

An optimal immune response should differentiate between harmful and innocuous antigens. Primitive systems of innate immunity, such as the complement system, may play a role in this distinction. When activated, the C3 component of complement attaches to potential antigens on microorganisms. To determine whether this alters acquired immune recognition, mice were immunized with a recombinant model antigen, hen egg lysozyme (HEL), fused to murine C3d. HEL bearing two and three copies of C3d was 1000- and 10,000-fold more immunogenic, respectively, than HEL alone. Thus, C3d is a molecular adjuvant of innate immunity that profoundly influences an acquired immune response.

Adjuvants, Immunologic

Levamisole effects on major histocompatibility complex and adhesion molecule expression and on myeloid cell adhesion to human colon tumor cell lines.

BACKGROUND: The drug levamisole has been successfully used in combination with fluorouracil to increase the disease-free interval and survival of patients who have undergone surgical resection of Dukes' stage C colon cancer. Levamisole is thought to affect the host immune response. Several recent studies have examined its effect on the expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules, but the results have been inconsistent. An equally important requirement for a host cellular immune response is the adhesion of leukocytes to tumor cells. The latter may be required for cell-mediated antitumor cytotoxic responses. PURPOSE: We evaluated the ability of levamisole to affect the expression of MHC class I molecules and cell-adhesion molecules and determined whether levamisole could affect leukocyte adhesion to tumor cells that had been treated with the drug. METHODS: A panel of four human colon tumor cell lines (HT-29, SW-620, HCT-15, and LoVo), A-375 human melanoma cells, and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were cultured in the presence of levamisole and examined by solid-phase enzyme immunoassay to determine the level of expression of MHC class I, intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), vascular cell-adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), leukocyte integrin VLA-4, and lymphocyte-functional antigen (LFA-1) molecules. Adhesion of HL-60 and THP-1 myeloid cells to tumor cells was also evaluated. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) at 10 ng/mL was used as a positive control for increasing adhesion molecule expression and cell-cell adhesion. The statistical significance of differences in cell surface molecule expression and functional adhesion between treated and control cells were tested by use of analysis of variance and the two-tailed Dunnett's test. RESULTS: Treatment with levamisole (0.1 and 1 micrograms/mL) caused the levels of MHC class I expression to increase approximately threefold above control levels on HCT-15 and LoVo colon tumor cells (P < .05 in each case) compared with untreated cells, caused minimal increases on HT-29 cells (to 1.5 times control levels), but caused no significant increases on SW-620 colon tumor or A-375 melanoma cells. The HCT-15 and LoVo colon tumor cells had very low basal MHC expression Levamisole (1 micrograms/mL) increased VCAM-1 expression on HT-29 and SW-620 colon tumor cells to 4.3 and 2.4 times (P < .05 in each case) control levels, respectively, doubled ICAM-1 expression on HT-29 cells (P < .05), and increased LFA-1 expression on HT-29, LoVo, and A-375 cells to 2.1, 3.2, and 1.8 (P < .05 in each case) times control levels, respectively. TNF (10 ng/mL) was used as a positive control and yielded increased expression of MHC class I molecules on the HT-29, LoVo, SW-620, and HCT-15 cells (2.5, 7.8, 1.9, and 4.8 times control levels, respectively; P < .05 in each case). TNF increased VCAM-1 expression to 4.2 times the vehicle-treated control levels (P < .05) on HT-29 cells and increased ICAM-1 expression on HT-29, LoVo, and SW-620 cells (8.4, 1.8, and 1.9 times vehicle control levels, respectively; P < .05 in each case). THP-1 and HL-60 cells demonstrated increased adhesion to levamisole-treated HT-29 colon tumor cells. HL-60 cells also exhibited increased levamisole-mediated adherence to LoVo and HCT-15 cells. Adherence by THP-1 was significantly improved after levamisole treatment of the HUVEC, SW-620, and A-375 cells (P < .05 in each case). CONCLUSIONS: Levamisole can directly affect the expression and function of molecules that are engaged in cell-cell recognition and signaling on the surfaces of some tumor cell lines. However, no consistent pattern between cell-adhesion molecule expression, cell-cell adhesion, or levamisole concentration could be discerned.

Adjuvants, Immunologic