PubMed · 15722331
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
R W Arnold, J Ruben, S P Donahue, AAPOS Vision Screening Committee. 2005. Korean kindergarten vision screen programme.. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2004.056663
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVE: To identify genetic variants associated with amblyopia in African (AFR) and Admixed American (AMR) ancestry groups, expanding on previous studies conducted in European ancestry. DESIGN: Retrospective ancestry-stratified genome-wide association study (GWAS) and gene-level rare variant association study (RVAS). PARTICIPANTS: Participants in the All of Us Research Program from AFR and AMR ancestry groups who had whole-genome sequencing available. Cases and controls were distinguished based on the presence of International Classification of Diseases 9/10/SNOMED diagnosis codes for amblyopia in electronic health records. This yielded ancestry-stratified subsets of 269 cases and 71 585 controls of AMR ancestry and 366 cases and 79 460 controls of AFR ancestry. METHODS: Stratified logistic regression models were adjusted for age, biological sex, and the top 10 principal components of genomic ancestry. GWAS was limited to common variants (minor allele frequency ≥1%), and RVAS was limited to rare variants with coding sequence-altering effects (minor allele frequency >1%, exonic only, excluding synonymous variants) aggregated at the gene level using the SKAT algorithm. Downstream analyses of the significant variants were performed using KEGG and GO pathway analysis and STRING database queries for protein-protein interactions and gene-gene interactions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Single-nucleotide polymorphisms were determined to have genome-wide significance if P < 5e-8 in the GWAS, and genes were determined to have significant association with amblyopia in the RVAS if P < 8.0 × 10-4. RESULTS: In the AMR GWAS, 245 unique single-nucleotide polymorphisms mapping to 97 distinct loci were identified, notably within neurodevelopmental and axonal guidance genes, including ROBO1, SEMA4B, PTPRD, NRXN1, and CAMK2D. The AFR GWAS identified 11 significant variants corresponding to 6 loci mapping primarily to long noncoding RNAs and pseudogenes. The AMR RVAS identified 15 genes, including axonal transport genes (KIF1B and KIF7) and growth factor signaling genes (EGF, ERBIN, and AKAP17A). The AFR RVAS identified a single gene, DLG2, which encodes the postsynaptic protein PSD-93, which promotes the closure of the sensitive period of neuroplasticity for vision in early childhood. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic risk architectures for amblyopia differ across ancestries but fundamentally converge on neurodevelopmental signaling, cortical synapse assembly, and sensitive period plasticity rather than ocular structural dynamics. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Orthoptic anomalies are prevalent: they are encountered in at least 5% of patients seen in a typical primary eyecare practice. Several cases are reviewed that highlight the role of contact lenses in treating orthoptic anomalies. In particular, contact lenses are the preferred optical approach to the correction of anisometropia, and it is often argued that anisometropia should be corrected as young as possible. However, fitting contact lenses to patients, particularly children, with anisometropic amblyopia has been problematic because there is no immediate binocular acuity improvement when the contact lenses are inserted which reduces patient motivation. Continuous wear with silicone hydrogels represents a breakthrough for these cases and some illustrative case studies are given. The visual deficit in amblyopia can be reduced in some cases solely by fitting contact lenses, without the need for occlusion therapy. Other orthoptic uses of contact lenses are reviewed including: correcting motor deviations, occlusion, and infantile onset nystagmus. It is concluded that there are orthoptic anomalies where contact lenses are the preferred mode of correction. It is in patients' best interest for practitioners to discuss contact lenses in these cases.