Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 15721151

Amelogenin: lessons from evolution.

Abstract

Amelogenin plays a crucial role in enamel structure and mineralization, but the function of its various domains is far to be understood. Evolutionary analysis seems to be a promising way to approach structure/function relationships. In this paper, we review the knowledge of amelogenin with a particular focus on what we have learnt from evolution, and we bring new data on the origin and evolution of this molecule. The comparison of amniote (reptiles and mammals) amelogenin sequences reveals that, in contrast to the well-conserved C- and N-terminal domains, the central region (most of exon 6) is highly variable. The evolutionary analysis indicates that it was created by repeated insertion of three amino acids (triplets ProXGlu or ProXX). In several mammalian lineages a new run of triplet insertions and deletions has occurred independently in a locus considered a hot spot of mutation for mammalian amelogenin. In lizard and snake amelogenin evolves rapidly. Sequence alignment reveals that several residues in the N- and C-terminal regions were kept unchanged during 250 million years (MY), proving their importance for amelogenin structure and function. This alignment permits a rapid validation of the amelogenin mutations in human. Genome sequencing and gene mapping permitted to refine the amelogenin story, in relation to the common location (chromosome 4 in human) of several genes coding for dental proteins and SPARCL1, a SPARC (osteonectin) relative. Amelogenin shares a similar organisation with these genes and a blast search in databanks indicates a strong relationship between amelogenin, ameloblastin and enamelin. Taken together these data suggest that amelogenin could have originated from either ameloblastin or enamelin, themselves being created from SPARCL1, which itself originated from a SPARC duplication, 600 millions years ago.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jean-Yves Sire, Sidney Delgado, Delphine Fromentin, Marc Girondot. 2005. Amelogenin: lessons from evolution.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2004.09.004

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Cellular uptake of amelogenin, and its localization to CD63, and Lamp1-positive vesicles.

Proteins of the developing enamel matrix include amelogenin, ameloblastin and enamelin. Of these three proteins amelogenin predominates. Protein-protein interactions are likely to occur at the ameloblast Tomes' processes between membrane-bound proteins and secreted enamel matrix proteins. Such protein-protein interactions could be associated with cell signaling or endocytosis. CD63 and Lamp1 are ubiquitously expressed, are lysosomal integral membrane proteins, and localize to the plasma membrane. CD63 and Lamp1 interact with amelogenin in vitro. In this study our objective was to study the molecular events of intercellular trafficking of an exogenous source of amelogenin, and related this movement to the spatiotemporal expression of CD63 and Lamp1 using various cell lineages. Exogenously added amelogenin moves rapidly into the cell into established Lamp1-positive vesicles that subsequently localize to the perinuclear region. These data indicate a possible mechanism by which amelogenin, or degraded amelogenin peptides, are removed from the extracellular matrix during enamel formation and maturation.

Amelogenesis↗

Variation in enamel development of South African fossil hominids.

Dental tissues provide important insights into aspects of hominid palaeobiology that are otherwise difficult to obtain from studies of the bony skeleton. Tooth enamel is formed by ameloblasts, which demonstrate daily secretory rhythms developing tissue-specific structures known as cross striations, and longer period markings called striae of Retzius. These enamel features were studied in the molars of two well known South African hominid species, Australopithecus africanus and Paranthropus robustus. Using newly developed portable confocal microscopy, we have obtained cross striation periodicities (number of cross striations between adjacent striae) for the largest sample of hominid teeth reported to date. These data indicate a mean periodicity of seven days in these small-bodied hominids. Important differences were observed in the inferred mechanisms of enamel development between these taxa. Ameloblasts maintain high rates of differentiation throughout cervical enamel development in P. robustus but not in A. africanus. In our sample, there were fewer lateral striae of Retzius in P. robustus than in A. africanus. In a molar of P. robustus, lateral enamel formed in a much shorter time than cuspal enamel, and the opposite was observed in two molars of A. africanus. In spite of the greater occlusal area and enamel thickness of the molars of both fossil species compared with modern humans, the total crown formation time of these three fossil molars was shorter than the corresponding tooth type in modern humans. Our results provide support for previous conclusions that molar crown formation time was short in Plio-Pleistocene hominids, and strongly suggest the presence of different mechanisms of amelogenesis, and thus tooth development, in these taxa.

Amelogenesis↗

Microstructure and chemical composition of primary teeth in children with Down syndrome and cerebral palsy.

This study was designed to test the hypothesis that prenatal growth insults leave permanent signs in the developing primary teeth that can be identified in later life. To test this hypothesis we examined exfoliated and extracted lower second primary molars of children with Down syndrome (DS) and cerebral palsy (CP). Teeth of children with no adverse medical history were used as a control group. Informed consent of parents and children was obtained in all cases. On each tooth two thin sections were cut, one bisecting the mesial cusps and one bisecting the distal cusps. Using a light microscope, the width of prenatal enamel and postnatal enamel was measured on each section at standardized locations from the dentin-enamel junction (DEJ) with the neonatal line used to distinguish between prenatal and postnatal enamel. Chemical analysis of each section was carried out using an energy dispersive spectrophotometer (ESR). The Ca/P ratios of enamel and dentin for each cusp were calculated and intercusp and intergroup differences analysed using non-parametric statistical tests. The results showed that significantly less enamel was laid down prenatally in DS and CP teeth than in the control group and that the enamel of the mesial cusps in these groups was less highly mineralised than that of the controls. The results also showed that in DS teeth growth and mineralisation of all cusps was affected. Based on these findings we propose that analysis of exfoliated deciduous teeth in developmentally challenged children may help in identifying the onset and severity of growth insults in utero and its impact on later development.

Amelogenesis↗