PubMed · 15715381
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Sara Beardsley. 2005. Avoiding another Vioxx.. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0205-16
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: Gaucher disease is a lysosomal storage disorder resulting from a deficiency of the lysosomal enzyme glucocerebrosidase. Since approval by the FDA in 1994 and EMEA in 1997, enzyme replacement therapy with Cerezyme (imiglucerase for injection) has been the standard of care for the treatment of Gaucher disease. OBJECTIVE: To review the long-term international safety experience of imiglucerase from 1994 through 2004. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All spontaneous adverse event reports captured in the pharmacovigilance database for imiglucerase from 1994 through 2004 were analyzed. All adverse events were classified using the current version of the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). Patients without prior exposure to imiglucerase from 1994 through 2005 were assessed for the development of antibodies to imiglucerase as detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbant and radioimmunoprecipitation assays. RESULTS: Analysis of the long-term safety experience with imiglucerase therapy demonstrates a stable and low rate of adverse events and seroconversion from 1994 through 2005. The majority of frequently reported adverse events related to imiglucerase were infusion-associated reactions which were predominantly self-limiting in nature and did not require discontinuation of treatment. Between 1994 and 2005, IgG antibodies to imiglucerase were detected in approximately 15% of treatment-naïve patients. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term stability of reported events and seroconversion is a reflection of a well-characterized cell expression system and a mature quality-controlled manufacturing process. Imiglucerase is a safe therapy for the treatment of Gaucher disease with a stable and low rate of reported adverse events and seroconversion.
The current Food and Drug Administration (FDA) system of regulating drug safety has serious limitations and is in need of changes. The major problems include the following: the design of initial preapproval studies lets uncommon, serious adverse events go undetected; massive underreporting of adverse events to the FDA postmarketing surveillance system reduces the ability to quantify risk accurately; manufacturers do not fulfill the majority of their postmarketing safety study commitments; the FDA lacks authority to pursue sponsors who violate regulations and ignore postmarketing safety study commitments; the public increasingly perceives the FDA as having become too close to the regulated pharmaceutical industry; the FDA's safety oversight structure is suboptimal; and the FDA's expertise and resources in drug safety and public health are limited. To address these problems, we urge Congress, which is ultimately responsible for the FDA's performance, to implement the following 5 recommendations: (1) give the FDA more direct legal authority to pursue violations, (2) authorize the adoption of a conditional drug approval policy, at least for selected drugs, (3) provide additional financial resources to support the safety operations, (4) mandate a reorganization of the agency with emphasis on strengthening the evaluation and proactive monitoring of drug safety, and (5) require broader representation of safety experts on the FDA's advisory committees.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.