Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 15584450

[Lighting condition analysis at work].

Abstract

Following a wide review of the national and international technical standards which make up the principal reference points when designing illumination systems for work areas, the most commonly used methods of photometric analysis are examined from both a medical and technical point of view. It can be observed that photometric analysis of the work place, which currently is almost exclusively based on the measurements of illuminance, does not appear to adequately reach the targets set by Occupational Health and Occupational Hygiene, for reasons pertaining to the anatomy and physiopathology of the visual function. Moreover, the procedures applied to evaluate the workers' subjectivity and/or symptomatology, that both in research and during on-site investigations makes use predominantly of self-administered questionnaires, shows some shortcomings in terms of reliability and validity. In conclusion, it is proposed, especially in studies regarding office environments (i) to carry out photometric analysis where primary and secondary luminance is always measured and, if light-linked subjectivity is required (ii) to make available valid and precise questionnaires whose administration be followed by a multivariate data analysis.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Aghemo, B Piccoli. [Lighting condition analysis at work].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15584450/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Association between occupational asthenopia and psycho-physiological indicators of visual strain in workers using video display terminals.

BACKGROUND: There is a body of scientific literature examining functional changes in vision due to video display terminals (VDTs). The aim of our study was to determine the relationship of functional visual strain and symptoms of asthenopia and to evaluate the association between subjective and objective indicators of visual strain. MATERIAL/METHODS: Four hundred four office workers with and without involvement in VDT work were included in the study. To evaluate visual strain we used a questionnaire for subjective complaints, evaluated the main ophthalmologic indicators, and measured psycho-physiological indicators. RESULTS: The questionnaire data showed that 88.5% of the VDT workers complained of various vision disorders. VDT workers who complained of worsened vision, redness of the eyes, eye pain, and diplopia during work were found to show more significant changes in the psycho-physiological indicators objectively reflecting strain of the vision analyzer. In the group of people with symptoms of asthenopia, the differences in the indicators of visual sensomotoric reaction, constancy of clear vision, and changes in the periods of clear and unclear vision were statistically reliably greater than in people without symptoms of visual strain. CONCLUSIONS: The subjective perception of visual strain related to VDT work was confirmed by ophthalmologic and psycho-physiological measurements. Changes in ocular and psycho-physiological function before and at the end of the workday are a good objective index of visual and central nervous system strain.

Asthenopia↗

Prevalence of eye disorders in young children with eyestrain complaints.

PURPOSE: To determine whether eyestrain symptoms predict eye conditions in 6-year-old children. DESIGN: Cross-sectional population-based study. METHODS: Reports of eyestrain symptoms were sought in parental questionnaires; 1740 children (79% response) underwent eye examinations (visual acuity, cover testing, cycloplegic autorefraction, and fundus examination). RESULTS: Eyestrain information was available for 1448 children; 220 (15.2%) reported eyestrain symptoms, including 60 (3.4%) who reported near work-associated headaches. Most children (82.3%) had a normal eye examination, while refractive errors, amblyopia, and strabismus were found in 15.0%, 3.6%, and 7.3%, respectively. Corresponding rates for children without eyestrain were 9.9%, 1.4%, and 1.8%, respectively. Moreover, 78.7% of children with refractive errors, 68% with amblyopia, and 58% with strabismus reported no eyestrain. CONCLUSIONS: Most children complaining of eyestrain had a normal eye examination; whereas most children with refractive error, amblyopia, or strabismus were free of eyestrain, making this complaint a poor marker of eye conditions in young children.

Asthenopia↗