Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 15507998

Conceptualizing human variation.

Abstract

What is the relationship between the patterns of biological and sociocultural variation in extant humans? Is this relationship accurately described, or best explained, by the term 'race' and the schema of 'racial' classification? What is the relationship between 'race', genetics and the demographic groups of society? Can extant humans be categorized into units that can scientifically be called 'races'? These questions underlie the discussions that address the explanations for the observed differences in many domains between named demographic groups across societies. These domains include disease incidence and prevalence and other variables studied by biologists and social scientists. Here, we offer a perspective on understanding human variation by exploring the meaning and use of the term 'race' and its relationship to a range of data. The quest is for a more useful approach with which to understand human biological variation, one that may provide better research designs and inform public policy.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S O Y Keita, R A Kittles, C D M Royal, G E Bonney, P Furbert-Harris, G M Dunston, C N Rotimi. 2004. Conceptualizing human variation.. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1455

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Evaluation of the Senegal leprosy endemic in 2002].

UNLABELLED: The authors had for aim to assess the epidemiology of leprosy in Senegal after 7 years of efficient prevention. METHODS: A retrospective study was made on epidemiologic data in Senegal collected between January 1 and December 31, 2002. The indicators of eradication (total number of new cases diagnosed in that year compared to the country's population, expressed in cases per 100,00 inhabitants), the coverage rate (number of cases treated compared to the number of patients recorded for treatment), as well as the cure rate (percentage of patients having complied to the duration of treatment) were all noted. RESULTS: The mean detection rate was 0.5 case per 100,000 inhabitants with 434 new cases reported. The prevalence rate was 0.99 per 10,000 with 981 cases recorded for total management. The coverage rate for total management was 100%. The observed cure rate was 89% and 8% of the patients were lost to follow-up.

Demography↗