Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15453023

[Informed consent: a pragmatic view].

Péter Kakuk
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The author highlights some pragmatic aspects of informed consent that could help to bridge the gap between the currently valid legal requirements and the practical realities of providing medical information in Hungarian health-care settings. One of the crucial point of informed consent is whether the patient properly understood the provided medical information. Consequently, effective communication becomes an inevitable condition of providing informed consent. The results and insights coming from psychological research--concerning lay understanding of medical information, of the readability of consent forms, and especially of the lay understanding of statistical information, and risk communication--could help to create a better practice of medical communication that could satisfy both ethical and legal requirements. The author argues as well for creating more concrete and practically oriented guidelines concerning informed consent that would also help to increase the quality of medical information giving. These might help us approach the medical ideal that was conceptualised in the doctrine of informed consent.

Explore related subjects

CommunicationHumansHungaryInformed ConsentEnglish AbstractJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Péter Kakuk. 2004-07-18. [Informed consent: a pragmatic view].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15453023/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗