Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 15382406

Professional behavior.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Anne Belcher. 2002. Professional behavior.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15382406/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Oncologists' opinions towards recommending exercise to patients with cancer: a Canadian national survey.

RATIONALE: The goal of this study was to examine oncologists' attitudes towards recommending exercise to patients with cancer during treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using a national survey, all 659 practicing medical and radiation oncologists in Canada were sent a brief questionnaire. RESULTS: The response rate was 46% (281/610). The majority of oncologists agreed that exercise was beneficial (62.0%), important (55.8%) and safe (63.1%) for patients with cancer during treatment. Forty-three percent of oncologists reported that they tried to recommend exercise to their patients when appropriate. Moreover, oncologists actually reported recommending exercise to 28% of their patients during the past month. Analyses also indicated significant differences between oncologists, with younger, female, and medical oncologists generally having more favorable attitudes towards exercise for patients with cancer than their older, male, and radiation oncology counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Oncologists have a favorable attitude toward recommending exercise to patients with cancer although several important barriers may prevent oncologists from providing exercise advice to their patients. Further research is required evaluating the effectiveness of interventions and strategies designed to improve oncologists' confidence and ability to advise their patients on exercise during oncology consultations.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

The FOCIS international survey on psychiatrists' opinions on cognition in schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: The goal of this project was to develop an interview to evaluate psychiatrists' views on the nature of cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia, its importance as a potential treatment target, and its relative importance as a treatment target across different phases of schizophrenia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey (available in paper or on-line) consisting of 27 questions, was developed by the Focus on Cognition in Schizophrenia (FOCIS) group, and distributed in a single wave mailing to 63,295 psychiatrists in 21 countries worldwide. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 4.7% (n=2975). The surveyed psychiatrists perceived cognition as a high treatment priority in stabilized schizophrenia patients, but less so for first episode or acute schizophrenia patients. The potential of atypical antipsychotics to improve cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia was identified by 81% of the respondent psychiatrists. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive deficits in people with schizophrenia are seen by clinical psychiatrists as relevant to treatment and rehabilitation plans. They were, however, regarded as a higher treatment priority in stabilized chronic rather than in first episode patients. The results suggest clinical psychiatrists need additional education regarding the nature of cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia and its importance for psychosocial rehabilitation and community re-entry.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

A survey of the SWISS researchers on the impact of sibling privacy protections on pedigree recruitment.

To understand the perceptions and attitudes about privacy safeguards in research and investigate the impact of letter-based proband-initiated contact on recruitment, we surveyed researchers in the Siblings With Ischemic Stroke Study (SWISS). All 49 actively recruiting sites provided at least 1 response, and 61% reported that potential probands were enthusiastic. Although 66% of researchers valued proband-initiated contact, only 23% said that probands viewed this strategy as important to protecting the privacy of siblings. A substantial minority of researchers (37%) said the strategy impeded enrollment, and 44% said it was overly burdensome to probands.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗