Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 15309933

Fisher's classification.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hidetoshi Kasuya. 2004. Fisher's classification.. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2004.101.2.0356

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Prevalence of types 16 and 33 is increased in high-risk human papillomavirus positive women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse.

High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) types are causally related to cervical cancer and its high-grade precursor lesions. The risk posed by the different hrHPV types for the development of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (> or =CIN2) needs to be established. Here, we present the hrHPV type-distribution in relation to cytology and histology for women participating in a cervical screening program. From 44,102 women who participated in a population-based cervical screening program in the Netherlands, 2,154 hrHPV GP5+/6+ PCR positive women were recruited to determine the distribution of 14 hrHPV types by reverse line blotting of GP5+/6+ PCR products. For each HPV type, associations with cytology and histologically confirmed > or =CIN2 were measured by odds ratios. HPV types 16 and 33 were more prevalent in women, amongst those containing a single hrHPV type, with moderate dyskaryosis or worse (>BMD) than in women with normal cytology, but only in case of underlying > or =CIN2 (OR 4.10, 95%CI 2.98-5.64 and OR 2.68, 95%CI 1.39-5.15, respectively). Similar results were obtained for women with double infections (OR 3.29, 95% CI 1.61-6.75 and OR 4.37, 95% CI 1.17-16.34). Coexisting types did not influence the prevalence of > or =CIN2 in HPV 16 or 33 positive women. The increased prevalence of type 16 and 33 in hrHPV positive women with > or =CIN2, compared to women with normal cytology, suggests that infection with these types confers an increased risk for development of > or =CIN2. Distinguishing these types may therefore have implications for future cervical screening strategies.

Cohort Studies↗

Recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: validation and improvement of an established prognostic index.

OBJECTIVES: To validate and improve an established prognostic index in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS: A Canadian three-covariate prognostic index (tumour grade at diagnosis, initial performance status, and time to relapse/primary progression (TRP)) was validated in a well-defined cohort of comparable Danish patients. Potential parameters to be included in an improved prognostic index were revealed by univariate and multivariate analyses in the Danish validation group. RESULTS: The Canadian index validated in the Danish patient population (n=189) found a statistical significant difference in survival between the prognostic groups good and intermediate (P<0.0001), whereas there was no significant difference in survival between the prognostic groups intermediate and poor (P=0.51). In order to improve the accuracy of the index, the candidate parameters, treatment free interval (TFI), CA125 level and performance status, at time of relapse/primary progression, were added, whereas the parameters, tumour grade, and initial performance status, from the Canadian index were excluded. As the correlation coefficient between TRP and TFI was very high (r=0.91), TRP was substituted with TFI in the improved prognostic model. The final model was: 0.8 (performance status)+0.33 log (CA125)-1.31 log (TFI). The improved model was a good predictor of one-year survival (AUC 0.85; logistic regression; P<0.0001). The median survival (with 95% CI) of the four prognostic groups (A-D) was 50.6 (34.0-not available), 25.0 (22.1-33.6), 11.3 (8.5-12.9), and 5.2 (3.5-6.3) months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A novel prognostic model (the Copenhagen index) for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer is presented.

Cohort Studies↗

Hepatitis C infection is not associated with systemic HIV-associated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a cohort study.

Immunosuppression induced by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) increases the risk of developing non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). As the hepatitis C virus (HCV) has been implicated in the development of B cell lymphomas, we compared the incidence of systemic NHL during HIV infection compared to HIV and HCV co-infection. Of 5,832 individuals studied during the era of highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART), 102 patients were diagnosed with systemic NHL. The incidence of systemic NHL was 6.9 of 10(4) patient years during HIV infection compared to 7.1 of 10(4) patient years during HIV alone (p = 0.9). In this immunocompromised patient population, there was no association between HCV infection and an increased risk of lymphoma.

Cohort Studies↗