PubMed · 15210664
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
N B Soni, A Selby, P Minchom. 2004. A complication worth remembering.. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2003.043570
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The management of urinary tract dysfunction is crucial for the health and well-being of people with spinal cord injury. Devices, specifically catheters, play an important role in the daily regime of bladder management for most people with spinal cord injury. However, the high incidence of complications associated with the use of catheters, and the fact that the spinal segments involved in lower urinary tract control remain intact in most cord-injured people, continue to motivate research into devices that could harness the nervous system to provide greater control over lower urinary tract function. Mechanical devices discussed in this review include catheters, artificial urethral sphincters, urethral stents and intraurethral pumps. Additionally, many attempts to restore control of the lower urinary tract with electrical stimulation have been made. Stimulation sites have included: inside the bladder, bladder wall, thigh, pelvic floor, dorsal penile nerve, pelvic nerve, tibial nerve, sacral roots, sacral nerves and spinal cord. Catheters and sacral root stimulators are two techniques whose efficacy is well established. Some approaches have proven less successful and others are still in the development stage. Modifications to sacral root stimulation including posterior root stimulation, anodal blockade and high-frequency blockade as well as new techniques including intraspinal microstimulation, urethral afferent stimulation and injectable microstimulators are also discussed. No single device has yet restored the control and function of the lower urinary tract to the pre-injury state, but new techniques are bringing this possibility closer to reality.
PURPOSE: To investigate the dosimetric consequences and rectal wall (Rwall) sparing effect of three different endorectal balloons (ERBs) for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In 20 patients, 4 planning computed tomography scans were made: 1 without ERB and 3 with ERB1, ERB2, or ERB3 inserted. Two different planning target volumes were defined: prostate only, and prostate plus seminal vesicles. The 3D-CRT and IMRT planning techniques were used, and the prescription dose was 78 Gy. In 284 treatment plans, the Rwall mean dose, the Rwall normal tissue complication probability, and the absolute Rwall volumes exposed to > or =50 Gy (V(50)) and > or =70 Gy (V(70)) were calculated. For spatial dose distribution analysis, inner rectal wall dose maps and dose surface histograms were generated. RESULTS: Each ERB was tolerated well. In the case of 3D-CRT, each ERB showed a statistically significant reduction of all the measured parameters. ERB2 and ERB3 performed better than ERB1. In IMRT, a statistically significant reduction in the Rwall dose parameters could not be demonstrated for any of the ERBs. For 3D-CRT and IMRT, as a result of the rectal dilation, ranging from 8 to 20 cm in circumference, the ERBs resulted in a reduction of the relative inner Rwall surface exposed to intermediate and high doses. CONCLUSIONS: In 3D-CRT, any ERB showed a significant rectal wall sparing effect. ERB2 and ERB3 were superior to ERB1. For both 3D-CRT and IMRT, a reduction of the relative inner Rwall surface exposed to intermediate and high doses was found, which may lead to reduced late rectal toxicity. Development of user- and patient-friendly ERBs is warranted to increase their acceptability.
Intrathecal drug administration using implanted catheter and pump systems has been used in routine clinical practice for more than 20 years to treat chronic refractory pain or spasticity. Complications associated with the use of these systems include drug related adverse events as well as technical problems, most of which are related either to the catheter or the procedure. Although traumatic neural damage is exceedingly rare it is usually associated with significant neurological impairment. We present a case of asymptomatic intraspinal migration of an intrathecal catheter three years after an uneventful implantation. To the best of our knowledge, this complication has never been reported before.