PubMed · 15139257
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Mairi Levitt. 2004. Complementarity rather than integration.. https://doi.org/10.1023/b%3Amhep.0000021850.72775.f3
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Genetic testing promises earlier intervention and more successful outcomes for individuals at risk for hereditary breast/ovarian and colorectal cancer. Research shows that gender influences health and access to health care services. In this paper, we review theoretical issues of gender, and research outcomes, in relation to genetic testing for hereditary cancers. We argue that integrating a gender analysis into assessment of new technologies and health programs is necessary to improve appropriateness, accessibility and effectiveness. Attention to gender is also critical to developing a deeper understanding of the ethical issues (both benefits and harms) raised by new genetic technologies.