PubMed · 15071510
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
R V Crowley. 2004-04-10. Primary dentition.. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4811148
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
After a caries decline of about 80% in children in Western Europe and other industrialized countries, there should be critical debate about the best way for future caries prevention. Multiple fluoride use played an important role in caries reductions achieved in the 1980s and 1990s, but it also resulted in a polarization of lesion distribution in young people: the majority consists of low-caries or even lesion-free individuals, while a minority is a so-called high caries risk group which seems not to be open to preventive programs. Recent studies indicate that frequent fluoride applications (>6 times/year) in conjunction with effective plaque removal can be a successful approach for effective future caries prevention in high caries risk groups. Health promotion programs that are merely educational and do not provide fluoride do not seem to be effective. Alternatively, preventive measures could be performed at home or in a private practice, but only minimal compliance is reached in high risk groups compared with out-reaching group programs. Thus, group programs are instrumental in providing effective and efficient caries-preventive measures in children. The more expensive time of a dental practice team should be limited to procedures where costly equipment is needed (professional tooth cleaning, sealants, etc.). For efficient caries prevention, measures formerly targeted specifically at either populations, groups, or individuals should be remodeled and aimed to interact in order to achieve optimal oral health in children at a reasonable cost.
BACKGROUND: Dental caries is a bacterially mediated disease characterised by demineralisation of the tooth surface, which may lead to cavitation, discomfort, pain and eventual tooth loss. Ozone is toxic to certain bacteria in vitro and it has been suggested that delivering ozone into a carious lesion might reduce the number of cariogenic bacteria. This possibly could arrest the progress of the lesion and may, in the presence of fluoride, perhaps allow remineralisation to occur. This may in turn delay or prevent the need for traditional dental conservation by 'drilling and filling'. OBJECTIVES: To assess whether ozone is effective in arresting or reversing the progression of dental caries. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register (to 7 November 2003); Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2003); MEDLINE and PREMEDLINE (OVID, 1966 to November 2003); EMBASE (OVID, 1980 to November 2003); CINAHL (OVID, 1982 to November 2003); AMED (OVID, 1985 to November 2003). Quintessence was handsearched through 2002 and KaVo were contacted as manufacturers of the HealOzone apparatus for any additional published or unpublished trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Inclusion was assessed independently by at least two reviewers. Trials were only included if they met the following criteria: randomisation in a controlled trial; single surface in vivo carious lesion accessible to ozone application; clear allocation concealment; ozone application to the lesions in the intervention group; no such application of ozone in the control group; outcomes measured after at least 6 months. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Reviewers independently extracted information in duplicate. A paucity of comparable data did not allow meta-analytic pooling of the included studies. MAIN RESULTS: Three trials were included, with a combined total of 432 randomised lesions (137 participants). Forty-two conference papers, abstracts and posters were excluded (from an unknown number of studies). The risk of bias in all studies appeared high. The analyses of all three studies were conducted at the level of the lesion, which is not independent of the person, for this reason pooling of data was not appropriate or attempted. Individual studies showed inconsistent effects of ozone on caries, across different measures of caries progression or regression. Few secondary outcomes were reported, but one trial reported an absence of adverse events. REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: Given the high risk of bias in the available studies and lack of consistency between different outcome measures, there is no reliable evidence that application of ozone gas to the surface of decayed teeth stops or reverses the decay process. There is a fundamental need for more evidence of appropriate rigour and quality before the use of ozone can be accepted into mainstream primary dental care or can be considered a viable alternative to current methods for the management and treatment of dental caries.
After an initial demineralisation, an intensive fluoridation is capable of inhibiting the erosive mineral loss in dentine completely, which might be related to the presence of the exposed organic dentine matrix. Aim of the present study was, therefore, to evaluate whether fluoride is also effective when the organic material is removed. The study was a cyclic de- and remineralisation model over 5 days in vitro. Samples from human coronal dentine were demineralised with citric acid (pH 2.3; 6 x 10 min per day) and intermittently stored in a remineralisation solution. Groups (n = 25 each) were defined as follows: Group 1: erosion only, no fluoridation; Group 2: erosion, alternately fluoridation with toothpaste (NaF; 0.15% F-; 3 x 5 min per day), mouthrinse (Olaflur/SnF2; 0.025 F-; 3 x 5 min per day) and gel (Olaflur/NaF; 1.25% F-; at Days 1 and 3 instead of one toothpaste application); Group 3: erosion and fluoridation as Group 2, organic material was continuously removed with collagenase (from Clostridium Histolyticum type VII, 100 U/ml) added to the remineralisation solution. Mineral content was monitored daily using longitudinal microradiogaphy. After fluoridation in the presence of collagenase, a linear increase in mineral loss (73.3 +/- 17.6 microm at Day 5) was observed, which significantly (P < or = 0.001) exceeded that of the control group (45.9 +/- 14.3 microm at Day 5). After fluoridation in the absence of collagenase, mineral loss ceased after the 2nd day (12.2 +/- 10.2 microm at Day 5) and was significantly lower compared to Groups 1 and 3 (P < or = 0.001). The results indicate that the dentine matrix is essential for the effectiveness of fluoride in dental erosion.