Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15006190

Rapid HIV testing: issues in implementation.

Frank H Galvan·Ronald A Brooks·Arleen A Leibowitz
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

With the approval of rapid HIV testing and the expected broader use of this technology, community-based organizations incorporating its use face both opportunities and challenges. The primary advantage of rapid testing is the ability to dramatically increase the number of individuals who become aware of their HIV status. Individuals will be able to test for HIV and learn their results in the same session. Many challenges exist, however, for those agencies considering offering rapid HIV testing. For example, given the potential for an increase in the number of individuals seeking rapid testing, there will be a need to ensure that the individuals who are at highest risk for HIV are being tested. In addition, given that rapid testing will be done in a single session, it will be necessary to consider how to effectively address a client's behaviors and attitudes concerning high-risk activities. New types of referrals may also need to be developed, such as for individuals who receive a preliminary positive HIV test result and who will need to return for a confirmatory result. In addition, those receiving confirmatory positive results will require immediate linkages to a variety of services, including medical, mental health, and social services. Also, counselors providing immediate test results may need additional skills and support to address the stress associated with implementing this new technology. Community agencies will need to utilize this technology in a way that maximizes its potential to identify cases of HIV and links individuals as quickly as possible to needed services.

Explore related subjects

AIDS SerodiagnosisAttitude to HealthConfidentialityCounselingHIV InfectionsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMass ScreeningNeeds AssessmentPrimary PreventionReferral and ConsultationRisk FactorsRisk-TakingSexual BehaviorTime FactorsJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Frank H Galvan, Ronald A Brooks, Arleen A Leibowitz. 2004. Rapid HIV testing: issues in implementation.. https://doi.org/10.1089/108729104322740875

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2005

Choosing HIV Counseling and Testing Strategies for Outreach Settings: A Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: In surveys, clients have expressed preferences for alternatives to traditional HIV counseling and testing. Few data exist to document how offering such alternatives affects acceptance of HIV testing and receipt of test results. OBJECTIVES: This randomized controlled trial compared types of HIV tests and counseling at a needle exchange and 2 bathhouses to determine which types most effectively ensured that clients received test results. METHODS: Four alternatives were offered on randomly determined days: (1) traditional test with standard counseling, (2) rapid test with standard counseling, (3) oral fluid test with standard counseling, and (4) traditional test with choice of written pretest materials or standard counseling. RESULTS: Of 17,010 clients offered testing, 7014 (41%) were eligible; of those eligible, 761 (11%) were tested: 324 at the needle exchange and 437 at the bathhouses. At the needle exchange, more clients accepted testing (odds ratio [OR] = 2.3; P < 0.001) and received results (OR = 2.6; P < 0.001) on days when the oral fluid test was offered compared with the traditional test. At the bathhouses, more clients accepted oral fluid testing (OR = 1.6; P < 0.001), but more clients overall received results on days when the rapid test was offered (OR = 1.9; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Oral fluid testing and rapid blood testing at both outreach venues resulted in significantly more people receiving test results compared with traditional HIV testing. Making counseling optional increased testing at the needle exchange but not at the bathhouses.

AIDS Serodiagnosis↗
PubMed2005

Outcomes of offering rapid point-of-care HIV testing in a sexually transmitted disease clinic.

BACKGROUND: Delays in receipt of positive HIV test results and in entry into HIV care are common problems in clinics; in public venues, up to 33% of patients with negative results and 25% of those with positive results never learn their results. METHODS: Patients aged 18 years or older at an urban sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic were offered rapid HIV testing between October 1999 and August 2000. Specimens were tested using the rapid Single Use Diagnostic System for HIV-1 (SUDS; Abbott/Murex, Norcross, GA), and results were confirmed by conventional enzyme immunoassay and Western blot (WB) analysis. Trained health educators performed all HIV counseling, phlebotomy, and rapid testing. RESULTS: Of 1977 eligible patients, 1581 (80%) agreed to HIV testing; of these, 1372 (87%) accepted rapid testing and 1357 (99%) received same-visit results and posttest counseling. Thirty-seven (2.7%) were HIV-positive as confirmed by WB analysis. One of these HIV-positive participants died, but the remaining 36 went to their first clinic appointment. CONCLUSION: Rapid HIV testing was acceptable and feasible in this STD clinic and facilitated entry of newly identified HIV-infected patients into health care.

AIDS Serodiagnosis↗