Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 14806792

Culdocentesis.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D W BEACHAM, W D BEACHAM. 1951. Culdocentesis.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14806792/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Tension-free vaginal tape procedure and laparoscopic colposuspension in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Within the last decade we have seen substantial development in the surgical techniques used to treat female stress urinary incontinence. The laparoscopic approach became available and even less invasive methods like the tension-free vaginal tape procedure were introduced. RECENT FINDINGS: These procedures offer quicker recovery and faster return to normal activities after surgery compared with the older procedures. The tension-free vaginal tape technique has been extensively studied and clinical data from a significant number of prospective observational cohort studies have been published. The number of reports on laparoscopic incontinence surgery is more limited. Long-term follow-up results with reassuring cure rates at 5 and 7 years are available for the tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Three-year follow-up results for the laparoscopic colposuspension procedure show reasonable cure rates, though not as good as those reported for the open colposuspension, the 'gold standard'. Both of these techniques are now widely used in everyday clinical practice. Perioperative and immediate postoperative complication rates are low and acceptable. However, data are limited in terms of randomized clinical trials comparing these fairly new techniques. SUMMARY: This review attempts to highlight the recent clinical experience of these two surgical techniques, including cure rates, complications and cost-effectiveness.

Colpotomy↗

A randomised controlled trial comparing abdominal and vaginal prolapse surgery: effects on urogenital function.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of vaginal hysterectomy (combined with anterior and/or posterior colporraphy) and abdominal sacro-colpopexy (with preservation of the uterus) on urogenital function. DESIGN: Randomised trial. SETTING: Three teaching hospitals in The Netherlands. POPULATION: Eighty-two patients undergoing surgical correction of uterine prolapse stages II-IV. METHODS: Participating patients completed the urogenital distress inventory (UDI), before and at six weeks, six months and one year after surgery, to measure discomfort of prolapse and micturition symptoms. Domain scores of the UDI (ranging from 0 to 100, higher scores indicating more discomfort) were compared between groups at all time points. Findings at pelvic examination, number of doctor visits within the first year after surgery because of pelvic floor symptoms and performed or planned surgery of recurrent genital prolapse were also compared. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Domain scores of the UDI at one year after surgery. RESULTS: At one year after surgery, scores on the discomfort/pain domain (mean difference 7.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-13.2), overactive bladder domain (mean difference 8.7, 95% CI 0.5-16.9) and obstructive micturition domain (mean difference 10.3, 95% CI 0.6-20.1) of the UDI were significantly higher in the abdominal group than in the vaginal group. Findings at pelvic examination were similar in both groups. Doctor visits because of pelvic floor symptoms were more frequent in the abdominal group than in the vaginal group. Re-operation was performed or planned in 9 of the 41 patients who underwent abdominal surgery and in 1 of the 41 patients who underwent vaginal surgery (odds ratio [OR] = 11.2, 95% CI 1.4-90.0). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that vaginal hysterectomy with anterior and/or posterior colporraphy is preferable to abdominal sacro-colpopexy with preservation of the uterus as surgical correction in patients with uterine prolapse stages II-IV.

Colpotomy↗