PubMed · 14748795
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
S Arif, N Singh. 2004. Abolish C3.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2303.2003.00117.x
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
CONTEXT: There is growing pressure to avoid hospitalizing emergency department patients who can be treated safely as outpatients, but this strategy depends on timely access to follow-up care. OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between reported insurance status and access to follow-up appointments for serious conditions that are commonly identified during an emergency department visit. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Eight research assistants called 499 randomly selected ambulatory clinics in 9 US cities (May 2002-February 2003) and identified themselves as new patients who had been seen in an emergency department and needed an urgent follow-up appointment (within 1 week) for 1 of 3 clinical vignettes (pneumonia, hypertension, or possible ectopic pregnancy). The same person called each clinic twice using the same clinical vignette but different insurance status. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Proportion of callers who were offered an appointment within a week. RESULTS: Of 499 clinics contacted in the final sample, 430 completed the study protocol. Four hundred six (47.2%) of 860 total callers and 277 (64.4%) of 430 privately insured callers were offered appointments within a week. Callers who claimed to have private insurance were more likely to receive appointments than those who claimed to have Medicaid coverage (63.6% [147/231] vs 34.2% [79/231]; difference, 29.4 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, 21.2-37.6; P<.001). Callers reporting private insurance coverage had higher appointment rates than callers who reported that they were uninsured but offered to pay 20 dollars and arrange payment of the balance (65.3% [130/199] vs 25.1% [50/199]; difference, 40.2; 95% confidence interval, 31.4-49.1; P<.001). There were no differences in appointment rates between callers who claimed to have private insurance coverage and those who reportedly were uninsured but willing to pay cash for the entire visit fee (66.3% [132/199] vs 62.8% [125/199]; difference, 3.5; 95% confidence interval -3.7 to 10.8; P = .31). The median charge was 100 dollars (range, 25 dollars-600 dollars). Seventy-two percent of clinics did not attempt to determine the severity of the caller's condition. CONCLUSIONS: Reported insurance status is associated with access to timely follow-up ambulatory care for potentially serious conditions. Having private insurance and being willing to pay cash may not eliminate the difficulty in obtaining urgent follow-up appointments.
To facilitate future decisions regarding the usefulness of rotavirus vaccines in the Republic of Korea, active surveillance was conducted in a network of clinics, emergency departments, and hospitals serving Jeongeub District, Korea. Children with diarrhea underwent standard clinical evaluations, and stool specimens were collected to test for the presence of rotavirus. Parents were interviewed to collect demographic and family information. From 1 July 2002 through 30 June 2004, a total of 4106 children, representing 1 (50%) of every 2 children <5 years old in the study population, were evaluated for rotavirus diarrhea. Of the 2232 stool specimens obtained throughout the year, 460 (20.6%) were rotavirus positive; however, the monthly prevalence of rotavirus infection peaked at 49.5% in February 2004. Of the 460 rotavirus-positive stool specimens, 366 were obtained from children who visited outpatient clinics, and 94 were obtained from children who were hospitalized. By extrapolating the proportion of rotavirus-positive patients to all children with diarrhea in the surveillance system, we calculate that 882 children in Jeongeub District had rotavirus infection (which would predict that there would be 702 associated clinic visits and 180 hospitalizations). Genotyping of rotavirus strains showed that 39% of strains were type G9P[8], 24% were type G1P[8], 17% were type G3P[8], and 13% were type G2P[4]. The incidence of rotavirus diarrhea peaked at age 13-24 months, and 94% of cases occurred during the first 3 years of life. The annual incidence of all rotavirus disease-associated outcomes was 56.9 cases/1000 children <5 years old (95% confidence interval [CI], 51.9-62.2 cases/1000 children <5 years old). The incidence of rotavirus disease-associated hospitalizations was 11.6 cases/1000 children <5 years old (95% CI, 9.5-14.2 cases/1000 children <5 years old). In Korea, diarrhea is common during childhood, and the incidence of diarrhea due to rotavirus infection suggests that improved programs for the prevention and control of both rotavirus diarrhea and diarrhea due to other causes are needed.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.