PubMed · 14748565
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Edward C Benzel. 2004. Adjacent-level disease.. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2004.100.1.0001
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
A systematic review was conducted to determine inter-examiner reliability of passive assessment of segmental intervertebral motion in the cervical and lumbar spine as well as to explore sources of heterogeneity. Passive assessment of motion is used to decide on treatments for neck and low-back pain patients. Inter-examiner reliability has been a matter of debate, resulting in questions about professional credibility and accountability. A structured search for relevant studies in MEDLINE and CINAHL was followed by extensive reference tracing and hand searching. Studies presenting estimates of reliability for individual motion segments were included. No language restrictions were imposed. Study quality was assessed using criteria derived from the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) statement and a quality assessment tool for studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (QUADAS). Study selection, quality assessment, and data extraction were performed by two reviewers independently. Qualitative analyses and additional subgroup analyses were conducted. Nineteen studies were included. Two studies satisfied criteria for external and internal validity, of which one found fair to moderate reliability. Assessment of motion segments C1-C2 and C2-C3 almost consistently reached at least fair reliability. Overall, inter-examiner reliability was poor to fair. However, most studies were found to be of poor methodological quality. We propose explicit recommendations for the conduct and reporting of future research.
STUDY DESIGN: A case report of a 55-year-old patient with extensive cervicothoracic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) that was treated with posterior decompression and fusion. OBJECTIVE: To report the preventive effect of posterior instrumentation on postoperative paralysis in extensive cervicothoracic OPLL. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Thoracic myelopathy caused by OPLL in the thoracic spine was treated with operative decompression of the spinal cord via an anterior, posterior, or posterolateral approach. However, the lack of availability for some approaches in specific cases, as well as reports of some problems for each approach, indicates that a lack of consensus still remains regarding the choice of operative procedure. METHODS: A 55-year-old female with extensive cervicothoracic OPLL presented with progressive numbness in the both hands and a gate disturbance. Cervical laminoplasty, thoracic laminectomy, and posterior fusion were performed with electrophysiologic monitoring of the spinal cord evoked potential. RESULTS: After thoracic laminectomy, the amplitude of spinal cord evoked potential waveforms decreased but recovered after a posterior fusion by instrumentation. CONCLUSION: Prevention of postoperative paralysis from increasing by posterior instrumentation was shown using neurophysiologic monitoring.
The objective of this study was to evaluate an X-ray films analysis software, i.e. to estimate the reliability and validity of clinical measurements by means of this software. The authors first performed tests of precision and reproducibility of measures. The precision for dynamic modules was estimated at +/-2 degrees for the lumbar analysis and +/-3 degrees for the cervical one. Mean reproducibility coefficients calculated for postural modules are about 4 degrees for the angular parameters and 3 mm for the linear ones. We also evaluated clinical applicability of the software through its validity. Reference values calculated on a population of healthy subjects showed agreement with the literature. Then, when analysing postural X-ray films of severe scoliotic patients, we found that inter-observer reproducibility coefficients show a lower reliability of measurements; the main cause seems to be the low visibility of anatomic landmarks due to the quality of X-ray films and to the degree of deformity. This study allowed to better estimate the reliability and the usefulness of this tool, allowing for multicentric studies and exchanges.