Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 14712621

Glycohemoglobin analyzers.

Abstract

For the millions of people with diabetes, maintaining near-normal glucose levels is vital for reducing or slowing the complications of the disease. A crucial tool for monitoring blood glucose levels is the glycohemoglobin (GHb) test. GHb analysis indicates the amount of glucose a patient's red blood cells were exposed to during the previous two to three months, allowing physicians to track trends and make appropriate changes in therapy. In the United States, this test is commonly performed on blood samples that have been sent to a laboratory, with written results provided to the physician several days later. Recently, though, analyzers have come onto the market that can be used at the point of care--a clinic or physician's office--or even in the home, providing results immediately. We evaluated five GHb analyzers from four suppliers: Axis-Shield, Bayer, Bio-Rad Laboratories, and Metrika. These products vary considerably--for example, one is a single-use test kit intended for point-of-care settings, while another is a batch analyzer that can run 15 samples at a time and is designed for low- to moderate-volume laboratory use. Our testing focused primarily on the analyzers' accuracy, precision, and ease of use. Different facilities will have different requirements, and none of these factors alone should determine a facility's purchasing decision. Rather, purchasers will have to balance all the performance factors--along with cost--when choosing a product. Consequently, we have provided separate ratings for hospital laboratory testing, point-of-care testing, and--for the one applicable unit--home testing.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2003. Glycohemoglobin analyzers.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14712621/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Stability of suspensions, emulsions, and foams studied by a novel automated analyzer.

The stability of dilute and concentrated dispersions (suspensions, emulsions, and foams) has been studied by a newly developed automated dispersion stability analyzer, DiStA 24. The analyzer operates by taking consecutive images of the samples studied and analyzing them by a personal computer (PC). As a result, the vertical profile of light scattered from each sample is obtained, recorded, and analyzed at time intervals preset by the computer software. In this way, the destructive processes in dispersions (sedimentation, creaming, and coalescence) can be detected well before it is possible by the naked eye and monitored automatically in the temperature range 0-50 degrees C. The new analyzer differs from the existing instruments by its simplicity and high productivity, allowing 24 samples to be measured simultaneously.

Autoanalysis↗

Performance characteristics of six third-generation assays for thyroid-stimulating hormone.

BACKGROUND: Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) is used to detect primary hypo- and hyperthyroidism. Current guidelines for TSH assays recommend a functional sensitivity of < or =0.02 mIU/L. The protocol for determining the functional sensitivity of TSH assays specifies analyses of serum samples with two reagent lots over a 6- to 8-week period. METHODS: We determined the functional sensitivities of the Access 2, ADVIA Centaur, ARCHITECT i2000, E170, IMMULITE 2000, and Vitros ECi automated methods, using seven serum pools and two reagent lots for each method. RESULTS: The observed functional sensitivities were as follows: Access 2, <0.020 mIU/L; ADVIA Centaur, 0.039 mIU/L; ARCHITECT i2000, <0.005 mIU/L; Elecsys E170, 0.011 mIU/L; IMMULITE 2000, 0.014 mIU/L; Vitros ECi, 0.004 mIU/L. However, there were large differences between some method means for the seven serum pools. For the pool with the lowest TSH concentration, mean results were as follows: Access 2, 0.0203 mIU/L; ADVIA Centaur, 0.0085 mIU/L; ARCHITECT i2000, 0.0049 mIU/L; E170, 0.0098 mIU/L; IMMULITE 2000, 0.0077 mIU/L; Vitros ECi, 0.0014 mIU/L. Method-comparison studies using samples with TSH concentrations >0.2 mIU/L also showed method differences. The ARCHITECT i2000 method was the most precise at low TSH concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: TSH methods do not provide comparable results for serum pools with TSH concentrations <0.2 mIU/L or for patient results across the analytic measurement range. Further investigation into the cause of these differences and additional harmonization efforts are required.

Autoanalysis↗