PubMed · 14709486
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
A Lee. 2004. NHS direct.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14709486/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Emergency medical services (EMS) in South Africa have developed rapidly over the last 20 years. However, there is inequitable distribution of services, with many rural areas being poorly resourced. This is partly as a result of the historical inequalities prevalent in the South African society of the past; efforts are being made to address this. EMS training is provided at basic, intermediate and advanced levels. The advanced level of training is comparable with the best in the world. Emergency care practitioners are registered with the Health Professions Council of South Africa and are thereby subject to the regulations, scope of practice and disciplinary structures of the council. Response times vary from 15 min in sophisticated urban systems to 40 min or longer in some rural services. Emergency departments (ED) are very busy, usually overloaded with patients, often poorly resourced and are similar to "Casualty Departments" that existed in the UK in the past. Facilities, staff and equipment are variable, and until recently there has been no formal career structure for emergency doctors. The introduction of emergency medicine as a new full speciality in 2004 will transform emergency care in Southern Africa, and appropriate training programmes are already being developed, together with progressive upgrading of emergency departments. EMS personnel face a vast spectrum of clinical cases, particularly all forms of trauma. Recent improvements in organisation, education and resources, coupled with better distribution of services, upgraded emergency departments and the development of emergency medicine as a speciality, should provide a significant boost for emergency care for the community.
BACKGROUND: Regionalized trauma systems have been shown repeatedly to improve the outcome of seriously injured patients. However, we do not have data regarding which components of these systems have the most impact on outcome and to what degree. The objective of this study was to understand the association between various components that make up a trauma system and outcome. METHODS: Surveys were administered to trauma directors at 59 hospitals in the province of Quebec, Canada. Data from the surveys were then linked with specific outcome variables obtained from a regionalized trauma database. Specific outcomes were assigned to trauma system- and in-hospital-based components after controlling for injury severity. RESULTS: Over 4.8 years, 72,073 patients met inclusion criteria. Components found to affect survival after risk adjustment were prehospital notification (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.39-0.94) and the presence of a performance improvement program in that hospital (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.20-0.94). Increased patient volume was associated with a reduction in risk-adjusted mortality (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99). Tertiary trauma centers were also associated with a reduction in risk-adjusted mortality compared with both secondary and primary centers (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.48-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in outcome in a regionalized trauma system are secondary to a combination of elements, as well as to the interplay of these elements on each other. Prehospital notification protocols and performance improvement programs appear to be most associated with decreased risk-adjusted odds of death.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.