Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 14564944

Multiple micronutrient deficiencies: future research needs.

Abstract

There has been a rising current of calls for a moratorium on international nutritional research in favor of an investment in intervention programs, per se. The topic of multiple-micronutrient supplementation reviewed at the International Workshop on Multi-Micronutrient Deficiency Control in the Life Cycle (May 30-June 1, 2001) has confirmed once again, however, the intimate interaction between program development and a supporting agenda of applied research. The areas of research required to produce successful intervention programs include biologic availability, safety and efficacy, communications and behavior, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness (efficiency), and food and pharmaceutical technology. Attention to safety and surveillance for unintended adverse effects has acquired new relevance as we analyze the multi-center International Research on Infant Supplementation (IRIS) I studies. All professionals involved in research projects in this area must assure both the quality and reliability of investigations and adhere to the highest principles of ethical conduct of research in human studies. The fundamental principles of research design and hypothesis development, quality assurance, reliability of measurements, and sound and unbiased interpretation of findings apply to all experimental science, and must be guaranteed for this mission. Agencies, academic institutions, and industry alike must work to create a system in which researchers can uphold these standards, and realize at the same time that the area of multi-micronutrient supplementation in developing countries can be a fertile area for training future researchers.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Rainer Gross, Noel W Solomons. 2003. Multiple micronutrient deficiencies: future research needs.. https://doi.org/10.1177/15648265030243s108

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Computed tomography screening for lung cancer: principles and results.

In modern healthcare, one of the most public, most important, and at the same time complicated and scientifically demanding topics is screening for a cancer. Mammographic screening for breast cancer has been, in the last few years, a particularly hotly disputed topic in scientific and public policy circles, with similar confusion and frustration widely reported and thus disseminated by the mass media. Most remarkably, this debacle has taken place against the backdrop of, and despite,a truly enormous amount of completed research designed to address the usefulness of such screening. To avoid a "mammography" debacle for lung cancer, the fundamental principles of screening need to be presented as we have come to think of them. Although it is generally accepted that low-dose computed tomography (CT) screening leads to early diagnosis of lung cancer in a high percentage of the cases, the logical consequence of the current knowledge is that annual CT screening prevents death from lung cancer. Thus, it is not whether CT screening is effective, rather the magnitude of its benefit which needs to be determined. We will illustrate our approach by discussing the Early Lung Cancer Action Project and its New York and International sequels.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗