PubMed · 14146729
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
M R MOHAMMED. 1964. URINALYSIS.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14146729/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: Analysis of fetal DNA from maternal plasma by PCR offers great potential for noninvasive prenatal genetic diagnosis. To further evaluate this potential, we developed and validated a standard protocol to determine whether fetal DNA sequences could be reproducibly amplified and measured across multiple laboratories in a common set of specimens. METHODS: Each of five participating centers in a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development consortium collected 20 mL of peripheral blood from 20 pregnant women between 10 and 20 weeks of gestation. The plasma fraction was separated according to a common protocol, divided, and frozen in five aliquots. One aliquot was shipped to each participating laboratory, where DNA was extracted according to a standard protocol. All plasma samples (n = 100) were then analyzed blindly for the presence and quantity of total DNA (GAPDH) and male fetal DNA (SRY) by real-time PCR. Genomic DNA was isolated from female and male cells at one center, quantified, and shipped to the others to serve as calibrators for GAPDH and SRY, respectively. RESULTS: The amplification of known quantities of DNA was consistent among all centers. The mean quantity of male DNA amplified from maternal plasma when the fetus was male ranged from 51 to 228 genome equivalents (GE)/mL. Qualitative concordance was found overall among centers. The sensitivity of the assay for detection of male DNA when the fetus was male varied from 31% to 97% among centers. Specificity was more consistent (93-100%) with only four false-positive results obtained across the entire study. CONCLUSIONS: All centers were able to consistently amplify frozen and shipped DNA. The PCR procedure used here is reliable and reproducible. Centers that extracted and amplified more DNA per milliliter of maternal plasma had superior sensitivities of Y chromosome sequence detection. The specificity of the assay was more consistent among centers. A robust and thoroughly optimized protocol for the extraction of DNA from maternal plasma is needed to make testing of fetal DNA in maternal plasma a clinically relevant analytical tool.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Direct detection of HCV RNA by nucleic acid amplification methods is an essential tool in the diagnosis of HCV infections. In-house developed methods based on reverse transcribed polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) are widely used but they are laborious and usually lack the standardization required by clinical laboratories. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the sensitivity and the clinical performance of an HCV specific nucleic acid sequence based amplification (NASBA) assay based on the commercially available, NucliSens Basic Kit (bioMérieux) reagents. STUDY DESIGN: The analytical sensitivity of the Basic Kit-based HCV assay (BK-HCV) was determined using dilutions of the First World Health Organization International Standard for HCV RNA. The performance of the BK-HCV was evaluated at two study sites in comparison with in-house RT-nested PCR (RT-nPCR) by testing a total of 77 plasma specimens. Additional HCV laboratory tests such as Amplicor HCV v2.0 (Roche Diagnostics) and genotype were also included in the comparative analysis. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the BK-HCV was 100-150 IU/ml HCV RNA (85-100% hit rate). When evaluating the clinical performance, we found 96-100% correlation between BK-HCV and RT-nPCR, and 85-91% correlation between BK-HCV and Amplicor. The level of efficiency of the BK-HCV for detecting prevalent HCV genotypes was equal to in house RT-nPCR and Amplicor. CONCLUSIONS: The BK-HCV offers adequate sensitivity for diagnostic purposes and equivalent clinical performance to in-house RT-nPCR assays. The BK-HCV could become a suitable alternative to the in-house amplification methods, providing standardized reagents and procedures, plus rapid results to clinical laboratories.