Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Urinalysis”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1999

A two-year study of microscopic urinalysis competency using the urinalysis-review computer program.

BACKGROUND: The microscopic examination of urine sediment is one of the most commonly performed microscope-based laboratory tests, but despite its widespread use, there has been no detailed study of the competency of medical technologists in performing this test. One reason for this is the lack of an effective competency assessment tool that can be applied uniformly across an institution. METHODS: This study describes the development and implementation of a computer program, Urinalysis-ReviewTM, which periodically tests competency in microscopic urinalysis and then summarizes individual and group test results. In this study, eight Urinalysis-Review exams were administered over 2 years to medical technologists (mean, 58 technologists per exam; range, 44-77) at our academic medical center. The eight exams contained 80 test questions, consisting of 72 structure identification questions and 8 quantification questions. The 72 structure questions required the identification of 134 urine sediment structures consisting of 63 examples of cells, 25 of casts, 18 of normal crystals, 8 of abnormal crystals, and 20 of organisms or artifacts. RESULTS: Overall, the medical technologists correctly identified 84% of cells, 72% of casts, 79% of normal crystals, 65% of abnormal crystals, and 81% of organisms and artifacts, and correctly answered 89% of the quantification questions. The results are probably a slight underestimate of competency because the images were analyzed without the knowledge of urine chemistry results. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows the feasibility of using a computer program for competency assessment in the clinical laboratory. In addition, the study establishes baseline measurements of competency that other laboratories can use for comparison, and which we will use in future studies that measure the effect of continuing education efforts in microscopic urinalysis.

Educational Measurement↗
PubMed2002

Routine urinalysis of patients in hospital in Lebanon: how worthwhile is it?

OBJECTIVES: To examine the impact of routine urinalysis at admission on inpatient care at a hospital in Lebanon, where physicians perceive it to be a valuable diagnostic tool, in a country where preventive services are underdeveloped and where the epidemiology of kidney diseases possibly differs from that of the western world. SETTING: American University Hospital, a tertiary teaching hospital in Beirut, Lebanon. METHODS: A retrospective medical record review of all adult patients admitted over 2 weeks to the medicine and surgery wards of the American University Hospital. Outcomes measured were frequency of routine urinalysis versus urinalysis for a clinical indication, investigation of abnormal test results, and implications of test results on clinical management. RESULTS: 367 (79%) of 462 study patients underwent urinalysis. 266 (73%) patients had routine urinalysis. Abnormal results were found in 97(37%) routine tests and 67 (66%) of those clinically indicated urinalysis (p<0.001). Abnormalities were investigated in 21 (22%) of the abnormal routine urinalyses and 45 (67%) of the abnormal clinically indicated urinalyses (p<0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed no factors to correlate positively with investigation of abnormal urinalysis. Treatment was given to two (1%) patients who had had routine urinalysis and 26 (26%) of all those tested because of a clinical indication (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical response to any abnormal urinalysis is more likely when a urine test is done for a clinical indication. In this study setting, impact of routine admission urinalysis on patient care was negligible. Despite physicians' perception of routine urinalysis being a valuable case finding tool, in this study its true value remains questionable.

Aged↗
PubMed1992

Analysis of cytodiagnostic urinalysis findings in 77 patients with concurrent renal biopsies.

We investigated the value of cytodiagnostic urinalysis in detecting and scoring the severity of the four types of renal lesions (glomerular, interstitial, tubular, and vascular). Both cytodiagnostic urinalysis and concurrent renal biopsy were performed in 77 patients (47 from native kidneys and 30 from transplants) and the scoring and findings assessed in a double-blinded fashion. Evaluation of the reproducibility for the counting of renal cells showed a low intraobserver and interobserver variation. Cytodiagnostic urinalysis correlated with the renal biopsy with respect to primary lesions in 42 (89%) of the native kidney cases, and in 23 (77%) of the transplant kidney cases. The accuracy of diagnosis of glomerular lesions in both native and transplanted kidneys was 0.91, and for acute rejection in transplanted kidneys, the accuracy of diagnosis was 0.73. Severity scores showed good correlation between cytodiagnostic urinalysis and renal biopsy in both transplanted and in native kidneys and cytodiagnostic urinalysis correlated well with the increase in creatinine levels. The most important components of cytodiagnostic urinalysis for the diagnosis of glomerular lesions were dysmorphic erythrocytes and proteinuria. The specificity and sensitivity of dysmorphic erythrocytes for a glomerular lesion were 0.89 and 0.88, respectively. In cases with biopsy-proven glomerular lesions, more severe changes were found by cytodiagnostic urinalysis when the biopsy showed proliferative lesions in the glomeruli than when normal glomeruli were found by light microscopy. Cytodiagnostic urinalysis has the advantage over renal biopsy that it can be repeated as often as necessary and thus allows observation of the development or regression of the renal lesion over time. We conclude that cytodiagnostic urinalysis is well correlated with the renal biopsy and that it provides valuable and quantitative information regarding the disease process in the kidney.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Urinalysis, ultrasound analysis, and renal dynamic scintigraphy in acute appendicitis.

OBJECTIVES: The influence of acute appendicitis (AA) on the right kidney and urinalysis was investigated. Permanent damage of the urinary tract and abnormal urinalysis have been previously reported in AA. METHODS: Appendectomy was performed in 84 patients with no previous urogenital, retroperitoneal, or pelvic disease, trauma, or operation. AA was confirmed in 66 of them. Control groups were the remaining 18 patients and 40 patients with varicocele repair. Renal sonography and urinalyses were done prior to operation, on days 1, 3, and 6 postoperatively. Pentetic acid renal scintigraphy was done on postoperative day 1 in patients with abnormal urinalysis. An obstructive radiographic curve indicated furosemide renography. RESULTS: Abnormal urinalysis was found in 48% of patients with AA before appendectomy and in 12% on day 6 postoperatively. Sonography showed pyelocaliceal dilation of the right kidney in 38% of patients with AA prior to appendectomy and in none on day 6 postoperatively. Patients with AA had pyelocaliceal dilation of the right kidney more frequently than those in the control groups (P < 0.001). It was more frequent in patients having abnormal urinalysis (P < 0.01). Scintigraphy confirmed pyelocaliceal dilation of the right kidney in 38% of patients with abnormal urinalysis. Furosemide renography excluded an obstruction in all of them. CONCLUSIONS: Inflammation is the major cause of abnormal urinalysis and transitory pyelocaliceal dilation in some patients with AA. Erythrocyturia, pyuria, proteinuria, and pyelocaliceal dilation detected by sonography or scintigraphy can frequently be found in patients with AA, but should not mislead the surgeon in the diagnosis of AA.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2004

A prospective study of the impact of automated dipstick urinalysis on the diagnosis of preeclampsia.

OBJECTIVE: To determine prospectively in hypertensive pregnant women 1) the accuracy of dipstick testing for proteinuria using automated urinalysis, 2) factors that might affect such accuracy, and 3) the potential impact of automated dipstick testing on the accuracy of diagnosis of preeclampsia according to acceptance of proteinuria at either 1 + or 2 + level. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Antenatal day assessment unit and antenatal ward of St George Hospital, a teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia. POPULATION: 170 hypertensive pregnant women attending as outpatients or inpatients. METHODS: 503 midstream urine samples were collected prospectively on separate occasions from 170 women. Full urinalysis was recorded using the Bayer Clinitek 50 automated urinalysis device and Multistix 10SG urinalysis strips (Bayer Diagnostics, Victoria, Australia). Each MSU was analysed for spot protein/creatinine ratio and also for culture and sensitivity if symptoms of a urinary tract infection were present or dipstick included positive nitrites. Urinalysis protein results were compared with spot urinary protein/creatinine ratio (previously shown to correlate with 24-hr urine protein excretion) to determine the accuracy of urinalysis. True proteinuria was defined as a ratio >/= 30 mg protein/mmol creatinine. RESULTS: False positive dipstick tests ranged from 7% at 3 + level to 71% at 1 + proteinuria level while false negative rates were 7% for "nil" and 14% for "trace" proteinuria, 9% overall. Accepting the dipstick proteinuria result at face value led to an incorrect diagnosis of preeclampsia or gestational hypertension in 85 (50%) women. Dipstick proteinuria was significantly more likely to be correct (true positive/true negative) if diastolic blood pressure was elevated > 90 mmHg (p = 0.032) and in the absence of ketonuria (p = 0.001). Accepting a diagnosis of preeclampsia on the basis of de novo hypertension and dipstick testing alone was accurate less often (70%) when > 1 + was used as a discriminant value than at the 82% of presentations when > 2 + was used (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Accepting "nil" or "trace" proteinuria as a true negative dipstick results fails to identify approximately 1 in 11 hypertensive pregnant women with true proteinuria, a false negative rate that may be acceptable provided these women are subject to ongoing vigilant clinical review. Even with automated urinalysis the false positive rate for dipstick levels >/= 1 + is very high, particularly in the presence of ketonuria and relying on this alone to diagnose preeclampsia leads to significant errors in diagnosis. Accepting >/= 2 + dipstick proteinuria improves overall diagnostic accuracy for preeclampsia at the expense of a higher false negative rate. This study emphasizes the need to confirm dipstick proteinuria with a further test such as a spot urine protein/creatinine ratio in all hypertensive pregnant women, particularly in research studies.

Australia↗
PubMed2002

Validity of urinalysis and microscopy for detecting urinary tract infection in the emergency department.

This study assessed the validity of standard urinalysis, urinalysis for leucocyte esterase and nitrites, and urgent microscopy in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection (UTI) in 60 female patients with a triage diagnosis of UTI. There were 24 (40%) proven UTIs after culture. Simple urinalysis was sensitive for UTI (95.8%) but the positive predictive value was only 45.1%. The addition of leucocyte esterase and nitrite urinalysis testing did not improve the sensitivity, but if both of these were positive the positive predictive value improved to 100%. Urgent microscopy alone was sensitive (100%) but non-specific (38.9%). The specificity of the diagnosis improved to 94.4% for organism counts of >or=10/microl and to 88.9% for leucocyte counts of >or=50/microl. The negative predictive value of no detectable leucocytes on microscopy was 94.7%. Screening for UTI in the emergency department (ED) population is improved by the addition of leucocyte esterase and nitrite test. A positive urinalysis test for leucocytes and nitrites, or urinalysis positive at levels of >or=500 leucocytes or >or=5 g/l protein should confirm a clinical diagnosis of UTI. Urgent urine microscopy should be performed only if the above criteria are not met yet a minimum of one urinalysis result is positive.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Biochemical and microscopic urinalysis: time and cost in a nephrology laboratory.

BACKGROUND: Urinalysis is a fundamental test in internal medicine and nephrology. Figures for costs are available in the general laboratory, where biochemical and microscopic urinalysis are commonly performed as semiautomated screening tests. Information on costs is lacking in the nephrology laboratory, where a time-consuming morphological analysis is usually preferred. This study analyses the costs of urinalysis in a nephrology laboratory. METHODS: In the nephrology laboratory at the University of Turin - Italy, biochemical urinalysis consists of multi-property strip and proteinuria/creatininuria, done by laboratory technicians. Phase-contrast microscopy is done by a nephrologist or biologist. Time dedicated to the tests was recorded by the same operator over 20 working days, during which 350 urine samples were processed (median 19/day, range 842). The production costs were calculated with the logic bottom-up technique. RESULTS: Overall time needed was 11.9 minutes/sample. Biochemical urinalysis required 6.6 minutes/sample; time required and samples processed were inversely related (< or =19 samples: 7.95 minutes/sample; >19 samples: 5.6 minutes/sample, p=0.01). Microscopic urinalysis took 5.3 minutes/slide; the best time-to-samples ratio was at 18-22 samples per day (with peak efficiency at 21 samples: 4.6 minutes). Cost of reagents and disposables was Euro1.06/sample. Time accounted for euro 5.32/sample (technicians, nephrologist-biologist), with total direct cost of euro 6.38/sample. CONCLUSION: In a nephrology laboratory, microscopic urinalysis is a time-consuming, expensive test. Analysis of cost and modalities may be useful, in a time of budget constrains, to maintain a role for this precious semeiotic art.

Chemistry, Clinical↗
PubMed1997

Timeliness of urinalysis: a College of American Pathologists Q-probes study of 346 small hospitals.

OBJECTIVE: To explore preanalytic handling of urinalysis specimens. DESIGN: The study was a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study consisting of two parts. The first part was a questionnaire about participants' urinalysis practices. The second part required collection of information from four specific urinalysis specimens per shift on 30 consecutive days or from 200 urine specimens, whichever occurred first. SETTING: Three hundred forty-six small hospitals enrolled in the Small Hospital Q-Probes program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Compliance with guidelines requiring nonrefrigeration and specimen measurement within 2 hours of collection, and identification of practices associated with better performance. RESULTS: Almost 50,000 urinalysis specimens were analyzed. About 68% of the specimens were measured without prior refrigeration, 2.3% were refrigerated before, 17.9% were refrigerated after, and 4.5% were refrigerated before and after arrival in the laboratory. Aggregate analysis indicated that 11.2% of never-refrigerated specimens exceeded the recommended 2-hour time standard before analysis. For inpatients and outpatients, respectively, 64% and 77% of laboratories were able to meet the 2-hour goal 90% of the time. Improved performance was associated statistically with ordering urinalysis stat, an enforced policy of specimen rejection for delayed transport of inpatient specimens, and the listing of a collection time for outpatient specimens. CONCLUSIONS: A large number of urinalysis specimens exceeded current quality guidelines for handling. Laboratories must monitor and improve preanalytic handling of urinalysis specimens.

Hospital Bed Capacity, 100 to 299↗
PubMed1997

Assessment of cocaine use with quantitative urinalysis and estimation of new uses.

Qualitative urinalysis methods of monitoring cocaine use may over-detect frequency of use, possibly decreasing the ability of clinical trials to detect effective treatments. Quantitative urinalysis and newly developed criteria for identifying new cocaine use were evaluated as alternative measures of cocaine use. Urine specimens collected in a cocaine dosing study in non-treatment-seeking subjects (n = 5) and a cocaine treatment trial (n = 37) were analyzed for the cocaine metabolite, benzoylecgonine, with qualitative and quantitative methods. Pharmacokinetic criteria ('New Use' rules) were applied to quantitative data to identify occasions of new cocaine use. Results were compared to known cocaine administrations in the laboratory study and to self-reported drug use and qualitative urinalysis for subjects in the clinical trial. New Use criteria correctly identified cocaine administrations in the cocaine dosing study in all but a small number of specimens. In the clinical trial, quantitative urinalysis and estimated New Uses provided more information about patterns and frequency of use than qualitative urinalysis in the different treatment conditions in the clinical trial. Interpretation of quantitative urinalysis with New Use rules appears to be a useful method for monitoring treatment outcome and may be more accurate than traditional qualitative urinalysis in estimating frequency of cocaine use.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Dipstick only urinalysis screen for the pediatric emergency room.

To determine if microscopic urinalysis is needed in all pediatric emergency room patients screened for urinary tract infections (UTI), we compared the dipstick urinalysis and complete urinalysis (dipstick and microscopy) with urine cultures in 236 children, aged 3 weeks to 21 years. The ability to detect UTI by dipstick only and by complete urinalysis was the same, however microscopic evaluation added many false-positive results without detecting additional UTIs. Because the ability to detect UTI (sensitivity) is maintained, we now offer a dipstick only urinalysis to our emergency room for children 2 years of age or older, with a microscopic analysis performed automatically if dipstick results are positive. If no microscopic urinalysis is required, testing turn-around time is reduced by 12.3 min/test and the hospital charge is reduced from U.S. $32 to U.S. $12.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Pediatricians' screening urinalysis practices.

OBJECTIVE: To determine pediatricians' routine screening urinalysis practices. STUDY DESIGN: This was a survey of a nationally representative sample of pediatricians practicing in the U.S. regarding their screening urinalysis practices in childhood. RESULTS: Of the 1502 pediatricians sampled, 653 eligible subjects participated, for an estimated response rate of 49.5%. The vast majority of participants (78%) routinely screen asymptomatic children with urinalysis in at least 1 age group. Pediatricians' screening urinalysis practice varies based on age group: 9% screen during infancy (<1 year), 60% screen during early childhood (1 up to 5 years), 55% screen during late childhood (5 to 12 years), and 58% screen during adolescence (13 to 20 years). The majority of pediatricians (58%) routinely screen more than 1 age group. Some 38% of the pediatricians surveyed believe that the overall health of children is improved by screening all asymptomatic children with urinalysis. CONCLUSIONS: Many pediatricians routinely conduct screening urinalysis during childhood, frequently at ages not recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2026

Ruling out pediatric bacterial epididymo-orchitis with urinalysis - The case for minimizing unnecessary antibiotic prescription.

INTRODUCTION: Epididymo-orchitis in pediatric patients is predominantly non-bacterial, often stemming from viral or reactive etiologies. Despite guidelines recommending conservative management for non-bacterial cases, antibiotic overtreatment remains prevalent in the outpatient setting. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of urinalysis in ruling out bacterial infection to support antibiotic stewardship in this population. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study using electronic health records from a large health maintenance organization in Israel. The cohort included patients younger than 18 years with a diagnosis of epididymo-orchitis or clinically overlapping entities (acute scrotum, appendage torsion) who had paired urinalysis and urine culture results within one week of diagnosis. Logistic regression and ROC curve analysis were performed to assess the ability of urinalysis parameters to predict positive urine cultures. RESULTS: Of 682 eligible cases, confirmed bacterial infection was rare, occurring in only 17 patients (2.5%). Nitrite positivity was the strongest independent predictor of infection (OR 43.98; p < 0.001). A prediction model incorporating all urinalysis parameters yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.825 and achieved a 97.7% classification accuracy for correctly predicting negative cultures. Despite the low prevalence of infection, antibiotics were prescribed in 237 cases (34.7%). Urinary anatomic abnormalities were significantly associated with culture positivity. CONCLUSIONS: Bacterial coinfection in pediatric epididymo-orchitis is uncommon. Urinalysis serves as a highly accurate screening tool to rule out bacterial etiology. A negative urinalysis supports withholding antibiotics in this setting, reserving treatment for children with positive markers or known anatomic abnormalities. This evidence-based approach This evidence-based approach has the potential to reduce unnecessary antibiotic exposure, however prospective studies are needed to validate these findings before broad implementation.

Humans↗
PubMed2001

Comparison of test characteristics of urine dipstick and urinalysis at various test cutoff points.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We compare the test characteristics of urine dipstick and urinalysis at various test cutoff points in women presenting to emergency departments and an intermediate care center with symptoms of urinary tract infection. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational study of adult women presenting to 1 of 2 community hospital EDs or an intermediate care center with dysuria, urgency, or urinary frequency on history, or suprapubic or costovertebral angle tenderness on examination. Patients who had taken antibiotics in the past 72 hours, had indwelling Foley catheters, symptomatic vaginal discharge, diabetes mellitus, immunodeficiency disorders, or were unable to provide a reliable history were excluded. The patient's clean-catch or catheterized urine specimen was tested immediately by a nurse using a Multistix 9 SG reagent strip. A second aliquot was sent within 1 hour of collection to the hospital laboratory, where a semiautomated microscopic urinalysis and a urine culture were performed. A positive urine culture was defined as more than 100,000 colonies of 1 or 2 uropathogenic bacteria per mL of urine at 48 hours. Dipstick and urinalysis data were compared with urine culture results. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated at various definitions of a positive test, or "test cutoff points," for combinations of leukocyte esterase, nitrite, and blood on dipstick and for RBCs and WBCs on urinalyses. The probability of an erroneous decision to withhold treatment on the basis of a negative test result was defined as "undertreatment," or 1 minus the negative predictive value. "Overtreatment" was defined as 1 minus the positive predictive value. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-three patients were enrolled in this study. Twelve patients were withdrawn because of missing laboratory results. Forty-six percent (152/331) of patients had positive urine cultures. If urine dipstick results are defined as positive when leukocyte esterase or nitrite is positive or blood is more than trace, the overtreatment rate is 47% (156/331) and the undertreatment rate is 13% (43/331). If urinalysis results are defined as positive when WBCs are more than 3 per high-power field or RBCs are more than 5 per high-power field, the overtreatment rate is 44% (146/331) and the undertreatment rate is 11% (36/331). Matched pairs of test characteristics were identified when the analysis was repeated using more than 10,000 colonies per mL as a positive culture. CONCLUSION: In this patient population, similar overtreatment and undertreatment rates were identified for various test cutoff points for urine dipstick tests and urinalysis. Although a urine dipstick may be equivalent to a urinalysis for the diagnosis of urinary tract infection, the limitations in the diagnostic accuracy of both tests should be incorporated into medical decisionmaking.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Evaluation of the centrifuged and Gram-stained smear, urinalysis, and reagent strip testing to detect asymptomatic bacteriuria in obstetric patients.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare the efficacy of the centrifuged and Gram-stained smear with the efficacy of both urinalysis and reagent strip testing for nitrites and leukocyte esterase in detecting asymptomatic bacteriuria in obstetric patients. STUDY DESIGN: A midstream urine specimen was evaluated in 528 patients either at the initial prenatal visit or at a visit because of possible preterm labor. Separate aliquots were tested by centrifugation (with a Cytospin Cytocentrifuge; Shandon, Inc, Pittsburgh, Pa) with Gram stain, by microscopic urinalysis for the presence of moderate to large numbers of bacteria or >10 leukocytes per high-power field, and by reagent strips for the presence of nitrites or leukocyte esterase activity. Results were compared with those of a quantitative urine culture obtained with blood and MacConkey agar plates. RESULTS: Thirty-six women (6.8%) had urine cultures showing 100,000 colony-forming units of a uropathogen per milliliter. The sensitivity and specificity of testing by centrifugation and Gram stain were 100% and 7.7%, respectively. Urinalysis and dipstick testing offered a sensitivity of 80.6% and 47.2%, respectively, with a specificity of 71.5% and 80.3%. No combination of tests, in series or in parallel, offered improved specificity over urinalysis alone. CONCLUSIONS: Centrifugation with Gram stain of a urine specimen offers excellent sensitivity but very poor specificity compared with microscopic urinalysis for the detection of asymptomatic bacteriuria and is not an acceptable screening test in an obstetric population. The false-negative rates of urinalysis (19.4%) and reagent strip testing (52.8%) preclude these from being excellent screening tests for asymptomatic bacteriuria. Given the potential sequelae of undiagnosed asymptomatic bacteriuria in an obstetric population, we conclude that urine cultures should be used for all pregnant patients to detect asymptomatic bacteriuria.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Enhanced urinalysis improves identification of febrile infants ages 60 days and younger at low risk for serious bacterial illness.

OBJECTIVE: Investigators have sought to establish "low-risk" criteria to identify febrile young infants who can be observed safely without antibiotics. Previous studies have used criteria for standard urinalysis to identify suspected urinary tract infection; however, cases of urinary tract infection have been missed. Enhanced urinalysis, using hemocytometer cell count and Gram stain performed on uncentrifuged urine, has been shown to have greater sensitivity and negative predictive value than standard urinalysis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of criteria that incorporate enhanced urinalysis to identify febrile young infants who are at low risk for serious bacterial illness (SBI). METHODS: Institutional guidelines were established in 1999 to evaluate in a retrospective cohort study infants who were </=60 days of age with temperature >/=38.0 degrees C. "Low-risk" criteria included 1) well appearance without focal infection (excluding otitis media); 2) no history of prematurity, illness, or previous antibiotics; 3) peripheral white blood cell count (WBC) between 5 and 15 000/mm(3); 4) absolute band count </=1500/mm(3); 5) cerebrospinal fluid WBC </=5/mm(3) with a negative Gram stain; 6) enhanced urinalysis with WBC </=9/mm(3) with a negative Gram stain; 7) stool WBC <5/high power field in infants with diarrhea; and 8) chest radiograph without lobar infiltrate(s) in infants with respiratory signs or symptoms. SBI was defined as a lobar infiltrate on chest radiograph or presence of a bacterial pathogen in blood, urine, cerebrospinal fluid, stool, or culture obtained from the soft tissue. The hospital records of all infants who presented to the emergency department for evaluation of fever after January 1999, including those who did not meet low-risk criteria, were reviewed; data were collected regarding history, physical examination, laboratory test results, treatment, and clinical course. RESULTS: During the study period, 434 infants presented to the emergency department for evaluation of fever. Thirty patients were excluded from additional analysis because of incomplete data; 60 patients were identified immediately as "not low risk" on the basis of history or physical examination. Of the 344 remaining infants, 127 were identified as "low risk" on the basis of laboratory criteria; 83 (65.4%) were observed without antibiotics. None of the "low-risk" infants had an SBI. A total of 217 well-appearing infants were classified as "not low risk" on the basis of laboratory criteria; 28 (12.9%) had an SBI. The overall incidence of SBI in infants with complete data was 10.1%, whereas the incidence of SBI in all "not low-risk" infants was 14.8%. The negative predictive value for the "Pittsburgh" criteria was 100% (95% confidence interval: 96.7%-100%); the sensitivity was 100% (95% confidence interval: 89.7%-100%). CONCLUSIONS: . The application of low-risk criteria using enhanced urinalysis improves identification of infants who are at low risk for SBI.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2002

The clinical utility of routine urinalysis in pregnancy: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether routine urinalysis in the antenatal period facilitates diagnosis of pre-eclampsia. Can routine urinalysis during pregnancy be discontinued in women with normal results of dipstick urinalysis and microscopy at the first antenatal visit? DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: A metropolitan public hospital and a private hospital in Sydney (NSW). PARTICIPANTS: One thousand women were enrolled at their first antenatal visit (March to November 1999), and 913 completed the study. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was a diagnosis of de novo hypertension (gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, or pre-eclampsia superimposed on chronic hypertension). RESULTS: Thirty-five women had dipstick proteinuria at their first antenatal visit. In 25 (71%) of these women, further dipstick proteinuria was detected during pregnancy, and two (6%) were diagnosed with pre-eclampsia. Of the 867 without dipstick proteinuria at the first visit, 338 (39%) had dipstick proteinuria (> 1+) at some time during pregnancy. There were no statistically significant differences in the proportion of women with and without dipstick proteinuria at their first visit who developed hypertension during pregnancy. Only six women developed proteinuria before the onset of hypertension. Women who had an abnormal result of a midstream urine test at their first visit, compared with women with a normal result, were more likely to have a urinary tract infection diagnosed during pregnancy; however, the numbers were small. CONCLUSION: In the absence of hypertension, routine urinalysis during pregnancy is a poor predictor of pre-eclampsia. Therefore, after an initial screening urinalysis, routine urinalysis could be eliminated from antenatal care without adverse outcomes for women.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Is oral fluid analysis as accurate as urinalysis in detecting drug use in a treatment setting?

BACKGROUND: Technology for testing oral fluid (OF) for the presence of drugs is available for treatment services and is more attractive than urinalysis: its validity is not well established. AIMS: Compare the accuracy of methods of on-site testing of OF and urine. DESIGN: Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of on-site testing of samples of OF and urine collected on the same occasion, using subsequent blind laboratory analysis of the same urine samples as the standard. SETTING: British addiction treatment service. PARTICIPANTS: 157 drug dependent persons, 89% with evidence of opiates, 73% male, and 85% aged between 20 and 35 years. MEASUREMENTS: Assessment of presence of four drugs using SYVA ETS urinalysis and Cozart Rapiscan OF Drug Test systems. Laboratory urinalysis using microplate enzyme-immunoassay technique. RESULTS: The sensitivity of OF tests and urinalysis were, respectively, for opiates 91 and 91%, methadone 91 and 94%, and benzodiazepines 6 and 72%. The specificity of OF tests and urinalysis were, respectively, for opiates 78 and 67%, methadone 90 and 95%, and benzodiazepines 95 and 96%. Amphetamine usage was rare. CONCLUSIONS: OF testing is as accurate as urinalysis in detecting the presence of opiates and methadone, and the absence of methadone and benzodiazepines.

Adult↗