Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 13299690

[Supernumerary cranial bones].

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H GUNTHER. 1956. [Supernumerary cranial bones].. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00954957

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Can epidemiology clear the fog of war? Lessons from the 1990-91 Gulf War.

Despite over US $200 million having been spent researching illnesses following the 1990-91 Persian Gulf War, the nature and cause of such illnesses remains controversial. In this narrative review, we discuss some of the methodological issues that have affected epidemiological studies on this topic. These include low-response rates, ascertainment bias, recall bias, problems identifying suitable control groups, and problems defining the outcomes to study. From this we argue that difficulties have arisen partly owing to the significant delay between the point at which illnesses were first identified by veterans and the reporting of epidemiological studies and that health surveillance should be routine following future deployments.

Congenital Abnormalities↗

Prenatal testing guidelines: time for a new approach.

Numerous advances over the past 15 years have led to a much wider array of prenatal testing options for pregnant women who are interested in obtaining information regarding the chromosomal status of their fetus. However, despite recent data calling into question the assumptions underlying current testing guidelines, including those inherent in the risk-based threshold for offering invasive testing, chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis are still typically offered only to women whose likelihood of carrying a fetus affected by a chromosomal disorder such as Down syndrome is at least as high as that of the average 35-year-old. In this paper, we summarize the evidence suggesting that this aspect of prenatal testing guidelines should be revisited, and that women should be allowed to make informed decisions regarding the use of invasive testing that are reflective of their own values and preferences.

Congenital Abnormalities↗