Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 12819776

Electrostatic nanolithography in polymers using atomic force microscopy.

Abstract

The past decade has witnessed an explosion of techniques used to pattern polymers on the nano (1-100 nm) and submicrometre (100-1,000 nm) scale, driven by the extensive versatility of polymers for diverse applications, such as molecular electronics, data storage, optoelectronics, displays, sacrificial templates and all forms of sensors. Conceptually, most of the patterning techniques, including microcontact printing (soft lithography), photolithography, electron-beam lithography, block-copolymer templating and dip-pen lithography, are based on the spatially selective removal or formation/deposition of polymer. Here, we demonstrate an alternative and novel lithography technique--electrostatic nanolithography using atomic force microscopy--that generates features by mass transport of polymer within an initially uniform, planar film without chemical crosslinking, substantial polymer degradation or ablation. The combination of localized softening of attolitres (10(2)-10(5) nm3) of polymer by Joule heating, extremely non-uniform electric field gradients to polarize and manipulate the soften polymer, and single-step process methodology using conventional atomic force microscopy (AFM) equipment, establishes a new paradigm for polymer nanolithography, allowing rapid (of the order of milliseconds) creation of raised (or depressed) features without external heating of a polymer film or AFM tip-film contact.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sergei F Lyuksyutov, Richard A Vaia, Pavel B Paramonov, Shane Juhl, Lynn Waterhouse, Robert M Ralich, Grigori Sigalov, Erol Sancaktar. 2003. Electrostatic nanolithography in polymers using atomic force microscopy.. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat926

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

AFM fishing nanotechnology is the way to reverse the Avogadro number in proteomics.

Future development of proteomics may be hindered by limitations in the concentration sensitivity of widespread technological approaches. The concentration sensitivity limit (CSL) of currently used approaches, like 2-DE/LC separation coupled with MS detection, etc., varies from 10(-9) to 10(-12) M. Therefore, proteomic technologies enable detection of up to 20% of the protein species present in the plasma. New technologies, like atomic force microscopy (AFM molecular detector), enable the counting of single molecules, whereas biospecific fishing can be used to capture these molecules from the biomaterial. At the same time, fishing also has thermodynamic limitations due to the reversibility of the binding. In cases where the fishing becomes irreversible, its combination with an AFM detector enables the registration of single protein molecules, and that opens up a way to lower the CSL down to the reverse Avogadro number.

Microscopy, Atomic Force↗

Single molecule studies of protein folding using atomic force microscopy.

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) offers new insights into the ability of proteins to resist mechanical force. The technique has been opened up by the availability of easy-to-use instruments that are commercially available, so that the technique no longer relies on the need to build instruments in the lab. Indeed it may become common for AFM instruments to sit beside stopped-flow apparatus in protein folding laboratories. In this chapter, we describe the instrument set-up, the preparation of suitable protein substrate, and the collection of data. Data selection and analysis are more complex than for conventional stopped-flow ensemble studies, but offer new insights into the function of proteins in vivo.

Microscopy, Atomic Force↗

Deposition of DNA rafts on cationic SAMs on silicon [100].

We demonstrate a guided self-assembly approach to the fabrication of DNA nanostructures on silicon substrates. DNA oligonucleotides self-assemble into "rafts" 8 x 37 x 2 nm in size. The rafts bind to cationic SAMs on silicon wafers. Electron-beam lithography of a thin poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) resist layer was used to define trenches, and (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (APTES), a cationic SAM precursor, was deposited from aqueous solution onto the exposed silicon dioxide at the trench bottoms. The remaining PMMA can be cleanly stripped off with dichloromethane, leaving APTES layers 0.7-1.2 nm in thickness and 110 nm in width. DNA rafts bind selectively to the resulting APTES stripes. The coverage of DNA rafts on adjacent areas of silicon dioxide is 20 times lower than on the APTES stripes. The topographic features of the rafts, measured by AFM, are identical to those of rafts deposited on wide-area SAMs. Binding to the APTES stripes appears to be very strong as indicated by "jamming" of the rafts at a saturation coverage of 42% and the stability to repeated AFM scanning in air.

Microscopy, Atomic Force↗