Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 12664355

[A new objective visual acuity test: an automated preferential looking].

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Preferential Looking test using Teller acuity cards is widely used for preverbal children but has some weaknesses, in particular because it is examiner dependent and at best half-objective. We tested a new automated method in a pilot study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In our preferential looking setting we project separate images into the left and right eye. This permits measuring each eye without having to cover the other. An infrared oculography system documents objectively and reproducibly whether or not the stimulus is seen. A square is shown which moves consecutively in a square formation on a background that has the same average brightness. Charting an XY-plot of the eye position results in a square with two diagonals, if the stimulus is seen. By using a specific baby examination unit, this test is already feasible in babies. In this study, the new setting was tested on two children. RESULTS: In two healthy children we found a good correlation between visual acuities determined with the new method and Teller visual acuity charts. Fogging one eye in each of the children resulted in fixation loss of the stimulus when the required visual acuity rose above the fogging value. CONCLUSIONS: This new technique permits one to perform an objective preferential looking test without the need of verbal answers. Larger studies have to validate these preliminary results.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Armin Breyer, Xiaoyi Jiang, Adrian Rütsche, Daniel S Mojon. 2003. [A new objective visual acuity test: an automated preferential looking].. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-38163

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A low glycaemic index breakfast cereal preferentially prevents children's cognitive performance from declining throughout the morning.

This study investigated whether the glycaemic index (GI) of breakfast cereal differentially affects children's attention and memory. Using a balanced cross-over design, on two consecutive mornings 64 children aged 6-11 years were given a high GI cereal and a low GI cereal in a counterbalanced order. They performed a series of computerised tests of attention and memory, once prior to breakfast and three times following breakfast at hourly intervals. The results indicate that children's performance declines throughout the morning and that this decline can be significantly reduced following the intake of a low GI cereal as compared with a high GI cereal on measures of accuracy of attention (M=-6.742 and -13.510, respectively, p<0.05) and secondary memory (M=-30.675 and -47.183, respectively, p<0.05).

Attention↗

Inhibitory control test is a simple method to diagnose minimal hepatic encephalopathy and predict development of overt hepatic encephalopathy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare inhibitory control test (ICT), a simple/rapid test of attention, to a standard psychometric battery (SPT) to diagnose minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) and predict development of overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) in cirrhotic patients. METHODS: Fifty nonalcoholic cirrhotics and 50 age/educational-status-matched controls were given ICT and SPT in the same sitting. Performance impaired beyond two standard deviations of controls was considered MHE in cirrhotics. ICT results (lure/target response and lures/person) were compared between controls and cirrhotics and within cirrhotics with/without MHE. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was used to study ICT for MHE diagnosis. Twenty subjects were administered SPT and ICT twice to assess test-retest reliability. All cirrhotics were followed routinely for the development of OHE. RESULTS: Cirrhotics performed worse than controls on SPT and ICT. Using SPT, 39 cirrhotics had MHE. ICT was administered faster than SPT (15 vs 37 min). Cirrhotics with MHE had significantly higher lure (28%vs 3%) and lower target response (91%vs 96%) compared with those without MHE. Lure/person >5 had 90% sensitivity/specificity for MHE diagnosis. AUC for receiver-operating characteristic for lures alone was 95.8%. Lure and target responses were highly correlated (r= 0.9) between sessions showing high test-retest reliability. Five (10%) patients developed OHE on f/u of 26 +/- 10 months; all five had been diagnosed with MHE using ICT and SPT. None of the five patients with discordant results on SPT and ICT developed OHE. CONCLUSIONS: ICT has good sensitivity/specificity for MHE diagnosis, is reliable and is equivalent to SPT for predicting OHE development.

Attention↗