PubMed · 1253136
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
A McGreevy, J Van Heukelem. 1976. Crying: the neglected dimension.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1253136/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Developmental change in human infant crying termination was studied in 60 infants who were 6, 9, and 12 weeks of age. They qualified by spontaneously crying for at least 30 s during the study's first minute. Infants then received either 0.8 ml sucrose (12% w/v) by syringe or sucked a pacifier dipped in the 12% solution for a total of 3.5 min. Crying was substantially reduced by pacifier-sucking at all three ages tested. Sucrose too was effective at 6 and 9 weeks of age but did not reduce crying in 12-week-olds. These data suggest different schedules in the decline of sweet taste and pacifier sucking as agents of crying termination. These differential rates argue for multiple systems that govern crying reduction and argue against a single central target that changes ontogenetically in sensitivity and control. Whether the continuation of sucking effectiveness is sustained by infant sucking experience or reflects a slower rate of decline cannot be determined at present.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the amplification and distortion of noise in incubators by measuring noise levels from various sources under various conditions. STUDY DESIGN: We recorded sound pressure levels (SPL) of background noise, baby crying, alarms and porthole closing with the incubator hood open or closed. Then we tried to reduce the sound level in the incubator by applying a sound absorbing panel to the ceiling of the hood. RESULTS: The sound sources analysed produced very high SPL. In free field baby crying and porthole noise were, respectively, 81-83 dB and 70-71 dB, closing the hood they raised to 84-87 and 73-74 dB: this means that the noise perceived by a baby in the incubator had twice the SPL of the same noise emitted in a free field; alarm noise was 56-57 dB inside incubators. Sound emitted inside the hood was also distorted, i.e. it had different features from the same source in a free field. The insulating panel prevented amplification and distortion due to the hood and reduced the SPL of alarms. Only background noise did not decrease with the panel. Sound absorbing panel reduced baby's crying, porthole noise and alarm noise SPL to 82-85, 70-71 and 50-51 dB, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Incubators are reverberating environments, which amplify the baby's cry and other noises produced inside the hood. The frequency components of noises are altered by the hood. The sound absorbing panel reduced this phenomenon.