PubMed · 12467168
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
E van der Does. 2002-11-16. [Acute appendicitis].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12467168/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
AIM: To see whether laparoscopy improves the accuracy of a clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis in women of reproductive age, and to determine what the long-term sequelae are of not removing an appendix deemed at laparoscopy to be normal. METHOD: The initial part of the study was undertaken during 1991-1992. Female patients between 16 and 45 years were eligible for inclusion once a clinical decision had been made to perform an appendicectomy for suspected acute appendicitis. Following consent, patients were randomized into two groups. One group had open appendicectomy, as planned. The other group had laparoscopy, followed by open appendicectomy only if the appendix was seen to be inflamed or was not visualized. The end points for the study were the clinical outcomes of all patients, and the results of histology, where appropriate. An attempt was made to contact all patients at 10 years to determine whether they had had a subsequent appendicectomy, or had been diagnosed with another abdominal condition that might be relevant to the initial presentation in 1991-1992. RESULTS: Laparoscopic assessment was correct in all cases in which the appendix was visualized. Diagnostic accuracy was improved from 75% to 97%. Laparoscopy was associated with no added complications, no increase in hospital stay in patients who went on to appendicectomy, and a reduction in hospital stay for those who underwent laparoscopy alone. No patients developed a problem over the 10-year follow-up period from having a normal-looking appendix not removed at laparoscopy. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic assessment of the appendix is reliable, and to leave a normal-looking appendix at laparoscopy does not appear to cause any long-term problems.
We investigated the clinical characteristics and treatment of patients with a distinctive triad of acute infusion-related reactions (AIRRs) to liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) via single-center and multicenter analyses. AIRRs occurred alone or in combination within 1 of 3 symptom complexes: (1) chest pain, dyspnea, and hypoxia; (2) severe abdomen, flank, or leg pain; and (3) flushing and urticaria. The frequency of AIRRs in the single-center analysis increased over time. Most AIRRs (86%) occurred within the first 5 min of infusion. All patients experienced rapid resolution of symptoms after intravenous diphenhydramine was administered. The multicenter analysis demonstrated a mean overall frequency of 20% (range, 0%-100%) of AIRRs among 64 centers. A triad of severe AIRRs to L-AMB may occur in some centers; most of these reactions may be effectively managed by diphenhydramine administration and interruption of L-AMB infusion.
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), together with its substantial therapeutic capabilities, carries a higher potential for complications than other endoscopic procedures. Common major complications specific to pancreaticobiliary instrumentation include pancreatitis, post-sphincterotomy hemorrhage, perforation, and cholangitis with or without systemic sepsis. Two patients underwent therapeutic ERCP for recurrent episodes of abdominal pain and elevation of hepatobiliary enzymes. Endoscopic sphincterotomy was difficult and prolonged. The calculi were successfully extracted by sweeping the choledochus with a balloon-tipped catheter or basket in both cases. The patients experienced postprocedure diffuse abdominal pain unassociated with nausea or vomiting. Laboratory data showed normal serum amylase and lipase 2, 6, and 18 h after the end of procedure, a fall in hematocrit level, and an increase of indirect bilirubin and lactic dehydrogenase. The abdominal pain subsided in 4 to 6 h. The hematocrit level remained stable during the next 3 days, and the patients were very well when discharged. Examination of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G-6PD) enzyme levels in red cells 20 days later showed complete enzyme deficiency. This report highlights the importance of examining G-6PD deficiency in patients with post-ERCP abdominal pain, normal serum amylase and lipase, and laboratory findings of hemolysis.