Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 121102

Microbiological assay for antifolate using folic acid assay method.

K G Bhatia·M K Phatak·M P Chitnis·P A Shetty·D J Jussawalla
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Biological AssayEnterococcus faecalisFolic AcidMethotrexateJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K G Bhatia, M K Phatak, M P Chitnis, P A Shetty, D J Jussawalla. 1979. Microbiological assay for antifolate using folic acid assay method.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/121102/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1979

In vivo recovery of factor VIII: a comparison of one-stage and two-stage assay methods.

The recovery and half-life of VIII:C in the plasma of severely haemophilic patients was measured by one-stage and two-stage assays after injection of two Factor VIII concentrates (Hemofil, Hyland and Fraction I-O, Kabi). Plasma volumes were measured with an Evans' Blue technique, and both concentrates and post-infusion samples were measured against the same plasma standard. There was a highly significant difference in recoveries estimated by the two assay methods. The one-stage assays gave the most consistent results, in that the average recovery was 100%, whereas the two-stage assays gave only about 80% of the value expected from in vitro assays. There was no differences in recoveries between the two concentrates. The two-stage assays gave a slightly shorter half-life than the one-stage assays, and the half-life of Hemofil was also shorter than that of Fraction I-O.

Biological Assay↗