Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 11957433

[The CARMEN study].

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Olav Bennedboek. 2002-04-01. [The CARMEN study].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11957433/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

CO2 production during acute infection in malnourished Malawian children.

OBJECTIVE: This study tested the hypotheses that the rate of CO2 production is less in marasmic children with acute infection when compared to well-nourished children, but greater when compared to uninfected marasmic children. DESIGN: A descriptive comparison of children aged 12-60 months who had their rates of CO2 production measured using a stable isotope tracer dilution method while receiving feedings. Body mass index (BMI) was the best measure of lean body mass available in this study. SETTING: Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, Blantyre, Malawi. SUBJECTS: A total of 56 children were studied, 28 with marasmus and acute infection, 16 with marasmus, and 12 well nourished with acute infection. Those with acute infection had malaria, pneumonia, or sepsis. RESULTS: Well-nourished children with acute infection produced more CO2 than marasmic children (344+/-60 vs 225+/-65 mmol CO2/h, mean+/-s.d., P<0.001; 24.2+/-4.6 vs 18.4+/-5.4 mmol CO2/BMI h, P=0.001). However, the rate of CO2 production in marasmic children with acute infection was not greater than in uninfected marasmic children (225+/-65 vs 228+/-61 mmol CO2/h). The observed rate of CO2 production was greater than that which could be produced from the dietary intake alone (29.6 vs. 25.8 mmol CO2/kg h). CONCLUSIONS: Marasmic children do not increase energy expenditure in response to acute infection, as well-nourished children do. Dietary energy provided to marasmic children should be at least 420 kJ/kg day.

Body Mass Index↗

Vitamin D status in female patients with primary hyperparathyroidism: does it play a role in skeletal damage?

OBJECTIVE: Vitamin D deficiency, even subclinical, has been considered to worsen the skeletal damage in primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). Our study aimed to investigate the impact of vitamin D status on skeletal involvement in PHPT. DESIGN AND MEASUREMENTS: A cross-sectional study was designed involving 62 female patients with PHPT. Serum total calcium (tCa), phosphate (P), creatinine (Cr) and total alkaline phosphatase activity (AP), together with 24-h (uCa 24 h) and spot fasting (uCa/Cr) urinary calcium, were measured by autoanalyser; ionized calcium (iCa) was assessed by an ion-specific electrode; intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) was measured by immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) and 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) by radioimmunoassay (RIA). Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at lumbar spine in 58 patients, and at femoral neck, Ward's triangle, greater trochanter, intertrochanteric line and total hip in 56 patients. The associations of all variables with age, 25-OHD, body mass index (BMI) and PTH were studied by linear multiple regression analysis, using progressively restricted models. RESULTS: The model including age, 25-OHD, PTH and BMI showed significant regression with BMD values. PTH, age and BMI exerted a leading role in determining such a significance, while no significant regression was found between the parameters studied and 25-OHD; this was confirmed by Pearson's linear correlation analysis. The progressively restricted models showed significant regression of BMD at femoral neck, femoral intertrochanteric line and total hip with age, BMI and PTH. BMD measured at the Ward's triangle and greater trochanter showed significant regression with age and BMI, and that measured at lumbar spine with age. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that in primary hyperparathyroidism patients the influence of 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels on bone mineral density, if any, was overwhelmed by the effects of parathyroid hormone excess, age and body mass index. The latter unequally affected bone mineral density of various measured sites with different composition.

Body Mass Index↗