Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 11764041

Decaying source method for scintillation camera resolving times.

Abstract

An earlier paper by the author showed that scintillation camera systems can be described effectively using the resolving times T and tau0 of the dominant nonparalyzable and paralyzable components, that is, the detector system and the computer interface, respectively. When used with a full spectrum window, the camera has a lower nonparalyzable and an upper paralyzable operating range with normalized threshold input rate n(t)= N(t)tau(0) = ln(1 +k(T)n(t)), where kT= T/(tau)0. Correct determination of T and tau(0) requires that both r12 and r in the normalized two-source equations kT=(2/r12- 1/r) and k0=(r12/2r2)ln(2r/r12) come from the nonparalyzable (n< or =n(t)) and paralyzable (n> or =n(t)) ranges, respectively. A serious constraint of the two-source method, therefore, is that the large ratio a = n12 ln = 2 can lead to an input rate range (n,n12), which includes the threshold point n,, and in which neither T nor tau0 can be measured correctly. The decaying source method constitutes a refinement of the two-source method, which enables smaller ratios 1<a<2 to be used, and also includes the two-source method as a special case (a=2). This new method requires just two consecutive readings on a single decaying source, as opposed to three measurements on two sources of activity, for each determination of T or tau0, thus also minimizing staff exposure. The fact that only count rates and time intervals need now be recorded greatly simplifies computerization of the data acquisition and analysis activities, and the potential for real-time applications is obvious. The method enables T and tau0 to be measured accurately and with sufficient resolution to reveal possible variations with input rate. Long measurement times using a decaying source can be avoided, if required, by using a set of decaying sources simultaneously to cover different portions of the count rate range. The application of the measurement procedure in real-time and the use of the resolving times in the accurate correction of deadtime losses, also in real-time, are treated separately in another paper.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T Woldeselassie. 2001. Decaying source method for scintillation camera resolving times.. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1398039

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Performance evaluation of dual-head coincidence gamma camera for positron imaging].

AIM AND METHODS: We assessed the performance evaluation of a dual-head coincidence gamma camera (Millennium VG, General Electric, Milwaukee, USA) as a positron emission tomography (PET) scanner based on the measurement indicator for performance evaluation of PET device. RESULTS: The axial spatial resolution was 4.98 mm FWHM at the center of the field of view. The true high count-rate characteristic curve was relatively straight within the range 0-0.2 microCi/ml. The relative recovery coefficient was 0.1 with a diameter of 10 mm and 0.39 with a diameter of 20 mm. CONCLUSION: In this study, we had to make a some change in the protocols described in the measurement indicator for performance evaluation of PET devices.

Gamma Cameras↗

A basic study on lesion detectability for hot spot imaging of positron emitters with dedicated PET and positron coincidence gamma camera.

The aim of this study was to explore the correlations of detectability and the semi-quantification for hot spot imaging with positron emitters in positron emission tomography (PET) and with a positron coincidence detection system (PCD). Phantom study results for the measurement of the lesion-to-background (L/B) ratio ranged from 2.0 to 30.3, and detectability for hot spot lesion of PET and PCD were performed to correspond to clinical conditions. The detectability and semi-quantitative evaluation of hot spots from 4.4 mm to 36.9 mm in diameter were performed from the PET and PCD images. There were strong correlations between the L/B ratios derived from PET and PCD hot spot images and actual L/B ratios; but the L/B ratio derived from PET was higher than that from PCD with a significant difference of 10% to 54.8%. The detectability of hot spot imaging of PCD was lower than that of PET at 64.8% (PCD) versus 77.8% (PET). Even the actual L/B ratio was 8.0, hot spots more than 10.6 mm in diameter could be clearly identified with PCD imaging. The same identification could be achieved with PET imaging even when the actual L/B ratio was 4.0. This detailed investigation indicated that FDG PCD yielded results comparable to FDG PET on visual analysis and semi-quantitative analysis in detecting hot spots in phantoms, but semi-quantitative analysis of the L/B ratio with FDG PCD was inferior to that with FDG PET and the detectability of PCD in smaller hot spots was significantly poor.

Gamma Cameras↗

UK audit and analysis of quantitative parameters obtained from gamma camera renography.

The purpose of this study was to perform an audit of quantitative values obtained from gamma camera renography in the UK. Ten patient image sequences representing normal and pathological renal function were obtained from archived studies and distributed to hospitals in the UK. Hospitals were asked to measure five parameters: relative function, renogram time-to-peak (left and right), and whole kidney mean transit time (left and right). Details of methodology, software used and operator experience were requested. This allowed the influence of operational factors on variations in reported values to be examined. A total of 180 responses from 81 hospitals were received. Values reported for the parameters, together with other details supplied, were entered into Excel and SPSS for statistical analysis. Histograms representing the distribution of values were produced for each parameter. The largest variations were found for mean transit time and occasionally for time-to-peak. The effect of factors was assessed using nonparametric statistical tests applied independently to each renogram. For all the parameters, the hospital, UK region, supplier, computer and software version influenced variations in the reported values. Algorithm and site of background region were influencing factors for relative function, the background subtraction method influenced time-to-peak, and curve smoothing influenced mean transit time.

Gamma Cameras↗