PubMed · 11702380
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
M Hyland, D M Miller. Getting back to work.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11702380/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Activity theory has been successfully applied in diverse schools of psychology with particularly extensive work in the fields of education, ergonomics, human factors and industrial-organizational psychology. However, existing efforts of translation and formulation in English suffer from certain limitations. These limitations include the blurring between Vygotsky's socio-cultural theory of the development of mind and activity theory, the restriction of activity theory in its entirety to the version offered by Leont'ev, errors in the interpretation of some basic concept and terminology, reliance on studies that use obsolete methods, and failure to consider the Russian work in activity theory in its entirety. This last problem results in the omission of the recent advances in engineering psychology and educational psychology in the former Soviet Union that facilitates the application of activity theory to practical problems. This paper is a description of the evolution of basic theory, concepts and terminology relevant to practitioners--particularly in the field of ergonomics.
STUDY DESIGN: Office workers invited and agreeing to participate were assigned to one of three study groups: a group receiving a highly adjustable chair with office ergonomics training, a training-only group, and a control group receiving the training at the end of the study. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of office ergonomics intervention in reducing musculoskeletal symptom growth over the workday and, secondarily, pain levels throughout the day. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data collection occurred 2 months and 1 month before the intervention and 2, 6, and 12 months postintervention. During each round, a short daily symptom survey was completed at the beginning, middle, and end of the workday for 5 days during a workweek to measure total bodily pain growth over the workday. Multilevel statistical models were used to test hypotheses. RESULTS: The chair-with-training intervention lowered symptom growth over the workday (P = 0.012) after 12 months of follow-up. No evidence suggested that training alone lowered symptom growth over the workday (P = 0.461); however, average pain levels in both intervention groups were reduced over the workday. CONCLUSION: Workers who received a highly adjustable chair and office ergonomics training had reduced symptom growth over the workday. The lack of a training-only group effect supports implementing training in conjunction with highly adjustable office furniture and equipment to reduce symptom growth. The ability to reduce symptom growth has implications for understanding how to prevent musculoskeletal injuries in knowledge workers.
In contrast to performance in cognitive tasks, tracking performance tends to deteriorate fairly consistently during spaceflight. We address the question whether this decrement results from specific effects of microgravity on motor control or from non-specific effects of the various other stressors present. In a case study we generalize the findings obtained with aiming movements, performed by the same cosmonaut with the same effectors as used for an unstable tracking task, to obtain hypotheses for specific changes of parameters of a simple model used to analyse tracking performance. Consistent with these hypotheses, we observed a reduction of limb stiffness in-flight, but a reduction of the tracking gain post-flight. The cross-task consistency of the observed changes does strongly suggest that the tracking impairment is at least partly caused by specific effects of microgravity on motor control, in particular by a mis-calibration of muscular forces which likely results from an underestimation of masses due to weightlessness.