Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Outpatients”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Mixing inpatient with outpatient care: establishing an outpatient clinic on a burn unit.

Outpatient care of patients with burns is an important aspect of a total health care plan. Changes in the health care system, which focuses on cost containment, force reevaluation of the methods used for delivery of high-tech care, particularly in areas such as burn care. Great advances that have taken place over the past decade in the field of burn care have enabled health care providers to treat more patients with burns as outpatients. Those who are specially trained in burn care continue to be the optimal caregivers. The appropriate facilities, spray tables, hydrotherapy, and dressing rooms in which patients with burns are treated are equally important and must be adapted to meet the needs of patients who are ambulatory. The goals of an outpatient burn clinic should be to provide daily wound care and patient education to prevent unnecessary admissions and to promote early discharge for hospitalized patients. Nurses trained in burn care are the optimal providers of ambulatory burn care; therefore the clinic location should be where the caregivers are available. Several obstacles needed to be overcome before an outpatient clinic could be established on the burn unit itself. Wound care is now provided by burn unit nurses, which leads to better results and more consistent follow-up. Patient satisfaction is increased, patient teaching is provided by experienced staff, unnecessary admissions are prevented, and patients are able to be discharged from the hospital earlier or to be followed as outpatients even if surgery is eventually required.

Burn Units↗
PubMed1989

Major bleeding in outpatients treated with warfarin: incidence and prediction by factors known at the start of outpatient therapy.

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of major bleeding in outpatients treated with warfarin and to identify predictive factors known at the start of therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of 565 patients starting outpatient therapy with warfarin upon discharge from a university hospital were reviewed. Follow-up information was obtained for 562 patients (99.5%). Bleeding was classified as major or minor using explicit criteria. The cumulative incidence of bleeding was estimated by means of survival analysis. Independent risk factors for major bleeding were identified using Cox regression analysis in 375 randomly chosen patients; they were tested in the remaining 187 patients. RESULTS: Major bleeding occurred in 65 patients (12%) and was fatal in 10 patients (2%). The cumulative incidences of major bleeding at one, 12, and 48 months were 3%, 11%, and 22%, respectively. The monthly risk of major bleeding decreased over time, from 3% during the first month of outpatient therapy to 0.3% per month after the first year of therapy. Five independent risk factors for major bleeding--age 65 years or greater, history of stroke, history of gastrointestinal bleeding, a serious comorbid condition (recent myocardial infarction, renal insufficiency, or severe anemia), atrial fibrillation--predicted major bleeding in the testing group; the cumulative incidence of major bleeding at 48 months was 2% in 57 low-risk patients, 17% in 110 middle-risk patients, and 63% in 20 high-risk patients. CONCLUSION: These findings provide a quantitative basis for evaluating the risk of major bleeding in individual patients at the start of outpatient therapy with warfarin. Whether the risk of bleeding can be reduced in high-risk patients without reducing the benefit of therapy remains to be determined.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

General practitioners' referrals to specialist outpatient clinics. I. Why general practitioners refer patients to specialist outpatient clinics.

There has been much concern about the wide variations in general practitioners' referral rates and the consequent implications for cost and quality of care. This has led to a call to evaluate the appropriateness and effectiveness of referrals. A collaborative audit of referrals to outpatient clinics was conducted by 127 general practitioners in 33 practices in the Oxford region. Records were kept of 18,754 referrals, which included data on diagnoses and reasons for referral. Overall, 6553 (35.4%) of the referrals were for particular treatments or operations and a further 6475 (34.9%) were for specific investigation or diagnosis. Advice on management was the main reason for referral in 2656 (14.3%) cases, and in 1719 (9.3%) cases the general practitioners wanted the consultants to take over managing their patients. Reassurance of either the general practitioner or the patient was recorded as the main reason in only 762 (4.1%) referrals. There seems to be scope for rationalising the referral process. A programme with three stages for evaluating referrals to outpatient clinics is recommended.

England↗
PubMed1989

General practitioners' referrals to specialist outpatient clinics. II. Locations of specialist outpatient clinics to which general practitioners refer patients.

Although linkage by computer of hospital administration systems across all clinics in a health district is becoming a practical possibility, complete records of general practitioners' referrals to outpatient clinics will be difficult to achieve. Data from a large study of general practitioners' referrals to such clinics were used to calculate the proportion of referrals that crossed district boundaries, the proportion that were made to the private sector; and the number of locations that each practice referred patients to. Of the 17,601 referrals from practices in Oxford Regional Health Authority, 13,857 (78.7%) were made to NHS outpatient clinics within practices' own districts, 1524 (8.7%) to clinics in other districts in the same region, 420 (2.4%) to NHS clinics in other regions, and 1800 (10.2%) to the private sector; but these proportions varied considerably among the practices. The mean number of different NHS hospitals or clinics that each practice referred patients to was 15.8 (range 4-42).

Catchment Area, Health↗
PubMed1992

Outpatient falloposcopy: intra-luminal imaging of the fallopian tube by trans-uterine fibre-optic endoscopy as an outpatient procedure.

OBJECTIVE: To develop trans-uterine falloposcopy using the linear eversion technique in outpatients. DESIGN: A prospective, descriptive study of the introduction and application of this new technique. SETTING: A tertiary referral University Research Clinic independent of operating theatres and inpatient admission. SUBJECTS: Twenty-one infertile women with previous evidence of fallopian tube disease. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rate of successful tubal cannulation and procedure completion, tubal section visualized, condition of the tubal epithelium, subsequent treatment plan. RESULTS: A bilateral examination was attempted in 19/21 patients and completed in 18. Two early falloposcopies with inadequate analgesia were aborted due to pain after only one tube had been examined without an attempt to identify or cannulate the contralateral tubal ostium. In one patient, neither ostium was identified or cannulated. After ostial localization, 37/37 tubes were cannulated. If the ostium was not localized but 'blind' cannulation attempted, 1/3 were cannulated successfully. Epithelium characteristic of the ampulla was seen in 31/38 (82%) tubes, and of the proximal tube only in 3/38 (8%). Successful bilateral assessment noted complete bilateral proximal obstruction in 2/18 patients, non-obstructive bilateral endotubal damage in 7/18, unilateral damage in 3/18 and bilateral healthy tubes in 6/18. Unilateral examination in two patients found minimal evidence of damage in one and severe intra-tubal adhesions in the other. After falloposcopy, 11/21 patients elected for IVF, 9/21 tubal surgery and 1/21 for IVF whilst awaiting surgery. CONCLUSION: Falloposcopy is a technique which can be performed in an outpatient clinic. It is well tolerated, and high rates of luminal cannulation and visualization are possible. Atraumatic access to the tube and visualization of its lumen offer exciting opportunities for diagnosis and treatment of tubal conditions.

Ambulatory Care↗
PubMed1991

This OWL (outpatient work-up liaison) would not fly. Environmental factors foil attempt to shift unnecessary inpatient days to the outpatient setting.

The last days of many appropriate hospital admissions have been identified as unnecessary when utilized for providing diagnostic or therapeutic modalities that could be provided in an outpatient setting. An outpatient work-up liaison team (OWL) was established to facilitate the completion of evaluations or therapy in the community. In spite of the commitment of experienced personnel and the cooperation of the staff physicians and hospital departments, the effort was unsuccessful. The failure is attributed to the socioeconomic environment in the immediate community that could not support the transfer of medical efforts. It is recommended that before any institution undertakes shifting hospital-based services to the community a realistic assessment be made of the socioeconomic milieu.

Ambulatory Care↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Reversal of the central effects of midazolam by intravenous flumazenil after general anesthesia in outpatients premedicated with an opioid and a muscle relaxant: report of a multicenter double-blind clinical study. The Flumazenil in General Anesthesia in Outpatients Study Group II.

Flumazenil was studied in a double-blind multicenter trial to confirm its efficacy and safety in antagonizing the central effects of benzodiazepines after general anesthesia (midazolam, short-acting narcotic, nitrous oxide) with muscle relaxants and selected potent volatile anesthetics as needed. One hundred seventy-two outpatients were randomly assigned to receive either flumazenil or placebo titrated to the point of reversal of sedation or a maximum dose of 1 mg of flumazenil or 10 ml of placebo. The test drug was given intravenously (0.2 mg flumazenil or 2 ml placebo) at 1-minute intervals. Tests of alertness, psychomotor function, and memory were conducted prestudy and at baseline before the administration of flumazenil and at 5-, 15-, 30-, 60-, 120-, and 180-minute intervals after administration. The changes from prestudy or baseline scores were analyzed to compare differences between treatment groups. Seventy-five percent of the 105 flumazenil-treated patients and 14% of the 55 placebo-treated patients who met the qualifications for efficacy evaluations obtained a criterion level of response as measured by the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale. Most (76%) patients who were alert at 5 minutes maintained their level of wakefulness throughout the 180-minute observation period. All 172 patients were included in evaluations of safety. Fifty percent of 113 flumazenil-treated patients and 31% of 59 placebo-treated patients reported one or more adverse experiences. The most frequently reported were nausea, vomiting, and dizziness. Only 6 adverse effects in the flumazenil group and 1 in the placebo group were considered severe; the remainder were mild or moderate. None were considered serious or potentially serious. Postoperative administration of flumazenil (mean dose, 0.85 mg) safely provided a prompt, controlled reversal of the sedative and psychomotor effects of midazolam in most patients.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Reversal of the central effects of midazolam by intravenous flumazenil after general anesthesia in outpatients: a multicenter double-blind clinical study. The Flumazenil in General Anesthesia in Outpatients Study Group I.

In a US double-blind, multicenter study, flumazenil, a benzodiazepine antagonist, administered postoperatively in a mean intravenous dose of 0.67 mg (range, 0.2 to 1 mg), was superior to placebo in reversing sedation and other central nervous system effects of benzodiazepines in outpatients recovering from general anesthesia induced by midazolam, fentanyl or sufentanil, and nitrous oxide. Within 5 minutes after administration of flumazenil, sedation was reversed in 94% (87 of 93) of flumazenil-treated patients, compared with 13% (6 of 46) of placebo-treated patients. The criterion response (Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale score of 4 or 5) that was achieved at 5 minutes was maintained in 79 (93%) of 85 patients throughout the 180-minute observation period. Psychomotor performance, measured by the Finger-to-Nose Test, was rated as normal at 5 minutes posttreatment for 77% (71 of 92) of flumazenil-treated patients, and 4% (2 of 46) of placebo-treated patients. The reversal of amnesia, as determined by the Picture Recall Test was less consistent. Patients given flumazenil did not experience more pain at the operative site or require more analgesic medication than did those given placebo. Nausea (flumazenil 24%; placebo 15%), dizziness (flumazenil 12%; placebo 2%), and vomiting (flumazenil 10%; placebo 9%) were the most frequent adverse effects in each group. In conclusion, flumazenil provided prompt arousal from benzodiazepine-induced sedation and was well tolerated.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A model for planning optimal follow-up for outpatients on warfarin anticoagulation. Warfarin Optimal Outpatient Follow-up Study Group.

Patients taking warfarin for long-term anticoagulation require frequent clinic visits to monitor the prothrombin time ratio (PTR), a measure of blood clotting. A dynamic stochastic model using nonlinear optimization was developed to select follow-up visit intervals that minimize the overall costs of patient care. Assuming that fluctuations in a patient's PTR behave as a random diffusion process, future PTR fluctuations are unknown, except as revealed by past PTRs. To determine the incidence and costs of complications in relation to PTR, the authors reviewed the charts of 216 patients who had 719 patient-years of follow-up with 695 trivial, significant, life-threatening, or fatal complications. They modeled the relationship between costs of complications and deviation of the PTR from the therapeutic target as a fourth-order convex polynomial. The model is used to compute the interval to the next follow-up visit to minimize accumulated potential costs. Variables in the optimization are the cost of a monitoring visit and the expected costs of complications. The latter are derived from the current PTR, the variability of the patient's past PTR values, the number of past PTRs available, and the target PTR for the patient. No attempt is made to predict the level of the next PTR or suggest adjustments in the warfarin dose. Shorter follow-up is recommended for patients who have histories of large fluctuations in past PTRs and for patients with few prior PTR determinations. As visits accumulate, the patient's degree of variability can be estimated more accurately and visit intervals adjusted accordingly. The scheduling method balances costs to the health care system of monitoring each patient against the expected costs of complications. This approach has the potential to reduce the number of monitoring visits necessary for safe management of anticoagulated patients with stable PTRs and to improve control among unstable patients.

Aged↗
PubMed1991

Outpatient care programs of mental health organizations, United States, 1988.

In 1988, 2,989 (60 percent) of the 4,961 mental health organizations in the United States (including the territories) offered outpatient care programs. A total of 5.8 million patient care episodes were generated by these organized outpatient programs. These episodes included 3.1 million outpatient additions, produced 54 million outpatient visits, and represented 67 percent of all patient care episodes in mental health organizations in 1988. Although the number of mental health organizations with outpatient care programs increased by less than one percent between 1986 and 1988, the number of outpatient additions showed an 11 percent gain during this period. Multiservice mental health organizations were the primary locus of outpatient care in 1988, accounting for 41 percent of the 2,989 mental health organizations providing this care. Ranking next in this respect, were free-standing psychiatric outpatient clinics, and the separate psychiatric outpatient services in non-Federal general hospitals, with 25 and 16 percent, respectively, of the total outpatient care programs. In general, these three organization types had similar rankings with respect to the volume of the outpatient caseload. By definition, all of the freestanding psychiatric outpatient clinics provided outpatient care, and almost all of the VA mental health programs and multiservice mental health organizations also offered this care (99 and 92 percent, respectively). In contrast, psychiatric outpatient care was available in only 37 percent of non-Federal general hospitals with separate psychiatric services, 36 percent of private psychiatric hospitals, 29 percent of State mental hospitals, and 22 percent of RTCs for emotionally disturbed children. Outpatient care was available in mental health organizations in all States in 1988, with every State having at least two or more organization types providing this service. In general, the most populous States had the largest number and the greatest variety of mental health organizations with outpatient care programs. Of the 2.87 million clients receiving outpatient care in mental health organizations at the end of 1988, 23 percent were under 18 years of age, 68 percent were 18 to 64, and 9 percent were 65 and older. Male outpatient clients slightly outnumbered female clients. The majority (77 percent) of the outpatient clients were white, with blacks representing 21 percent; native Americans and Asians/Pacific Islanders, the remaining two percent. Eleven percent of the total client population were reported to be of Hispanic origin.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Ambulatory Care↗
PubMed1979

Survey of outpatient pharmaceutical services in university hospitals.

The results of a 1978 survey of outpatient pharmacies in university-affiliated hospitals are reported. A questionnaire with 55 items was sent to 75 university-affiliated hospitals with outpatient clinics. Sixty hospitals responded. Of the 47 usable responses, 44 were from hospitals with outpatient pharmacies. The outpatient pharmacies served a mean of 163 patients/day, dispensing a mean of 295 prescriptions/day. Prescriptions from outpatient clinics accounted for a mean of 57% of the outpatient pharmacies' prescriptions. Only four outpatient pharmacies provided 24-hour, seven-day/week services; the remainder provided a mean 11.1 hours of service per day on weekdays. The mean number of full-time equivalent pharmacists employed in the outpatient pharmacies (2.9) correlated positively with the number of prescriptions dispensed daily. The straight-fee pricing system was used by 62% of outpatient pharmacies but pricing systems varied with the type of product dispensed. Computer services were used in 28% of the outpatient pharmacies but were restricted mainly to accounting and inventory functions. Only 15% of the outpatient pharmacies maintained patient profiles for all patients served, and only 21% conducted special patient education programs in drug therapy.

Drug Prescriptions↗