PubMed · 11684647
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J Auer, B Robert, B Eber. 2001-10-30. Peripheral and myocardial microcirculation.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11684647/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: The new guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation recommend that laypersons should begin chest compressions without checking for a pulse because the pulse check has serious limitations in accuracy. We determined the efficacy of the most suitable method to search for cardiac activity in infants. METHODS: Twenty-eight nurses tried to detect infants' cardiac activity and determined their heart rates with five different techniques: palpation of brachial pulse, carotid pulse, femoral pulse, apical impulse and auscultation of apical impulse with the naked ear (direct auscultation technique). RESULTS: The mean time interval required to find the pulse within 30 s in the auscultation, the apical, the brachial, the carotid and the femoral were 2.4 +/- 1.2, 3.5 +/- 2.7, 4.0 +/- 2.7, 9.9 +/- 7.0 and 9.1 +/- 5.9 s, respectively. The required time was significantly shorter in the auscultation method than in the palpation of carotid and femoral pulses. The percentage and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of pulses identified within 10 s (= the number of the correct identified within 10 s/the number of all cases) in auscultation, apical, brachial, carotid and femoral palpations were 100.0% (95% CI 51.8, 100), 75.0% (95% CI 28.9, 89.3), 73.1% (95% CI 52.2, 88.4), 50.0% (95% CI 30.6, 69.4) and 42.9% (95% CI 24.5, 62.8), respectively. These values were greater in the auscultation method than in all the palpation methods. CONCLUSIONS: The direct auscultation technique was more rapid and accurate than any other techniques to determine cardiac activity without instruments. It is suggested that direct a auscultation technique is also superior to the palpation of brachial artery in cardiopulmonary resuscitation in infants.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of raloxifene on endothelial function in healthy, postmenopausal women. STUDY DESIGN: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. Subjects (n = 19; mean age, 61 years) underwent endothelial function testing at baseline and after treatment with placebo or raloxifene (60 mg per day for 6 weeks). RESULTS: Brachial artery diameter change (flow-mediated dilation) increased 5.0% with placebo and 8.56% with raloxifene (SE = 1.83, P =.03) in response to a hyperemic stimulus; an adjustment of this response for a variation in stimulus intensity resulted in greater discrimination (P =.009). The ratio of area under the curve response to area under the curve reference with the use of laser Doppler measures was 1.18 for placebo and 1.28 for raloxifene (P =.05). Flow-mediated dilation and area under the curve ratio correlated significantly (r = 0.33, P =.04). CONCLUSION: Treatment with raloxifene enhanced endothelial-mediated dilation in brachial arteries and digital vessels in healthy, postmenopausal women. A potential mechanism for a cardioprotective effect of raloxifene is suggested and warrants further study.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.