PubMed · 11634457
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J R Mendlem. 1969. [Not Available].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11634457/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Distribution of small roots (diameter between 2 mm and 5 mm) was studied in 19 pits with a total of 72 m(2) trench profile walls in pure stands of Fagus sylvatica and Picea abies. Root positions within the walls were marked and transformed into x-coordinates and y-coordinates. In a GIS-based evaluation, zones of potential influence around each root were calculated. The total potential influence produced isoline maps of relative root influence zones, thus indicating small root clustering. The questions studied were (1) whether there were marked clusters of small roots in the soil and (2) whether trees surrounding the pit (defined as tree density) correlate with the root abundance and distribution on the trench profile walls. Small roots of both species showed maximum abundance in the top 20 cm of the soil, where pronounced root clusters occurred next to areas with only low root accumulation. The area of root clusters did not differ significantly between the two stands. Weighted clumping, WC, calculated as a product of root class, and its area was used as an index of root clustering, which again did not differ between beech and spruce stands. However, evaluations on a single root level showed that beech achieved the same degree of clustering with lower number of roots. Regardless of soil properties related to root clusters, a significantly higher clustering acquired per root for beech than for spruce suggests beech to be more efficient in belowground acquisition of space. Because none of the parameters describing root clustering were correlated with tree density around the investigated soil profiles, clusters of small roots are inherently present within the tree stands.
An inter-laboratory comparison study was conducted to assess the image quality of PET scanners in Austria. The survey included both dedicated PET scanners (D-PET, n = 8) and coincidence cameras (GC-PET, n = 7). Measurement of image quality was based on the NEMA (National Electrical Manufacturers Association) NU 2-2001 protocol and the IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission) body phantom. The latter contains six fillable spheres ranging in diameter from 37 mm down to 10 mm and a 'lung' insert. The two largest lesions L1-2 simulate cold lesions, the four smaller ones (L3-6) are filled with 18F and activity concentration ratios relative to background of 8:1 and 4:1, respectively. Acquisition and reconstruction in the study employed the participating institutes' standard oncological processing protocol. Calculation of contrast of the spheres was performed with a fully automated procedure. Contrast quality indices (CQIs) reflecting global performance were obtained by summing individual contrast values. Other image quality parameters calculated according to the NEMA protocol were background variability and relative error for correction of attenuation and scatter. Contrast values obtained were 61 +/- 16 and 37 +/- 14 for L1 (per cent contrast +/- SD for D-PET and GC-PET, respectively), 57 +/- 16 and 29 +/- 16 for L2, 46 +/- 10 and 26 +/- 6.3 for L3, 37 +/- 10 and 15 +/- 4.3 for L4, 26 +/- 11.5 and 6.1 +/- 2.5 for L5, 14 +/- 7.1 and 2.6 +/- 2.6 for L6, with D-PET systems consistently being superior to GC-PET systems. CQIs permitted ranking of the scanners, also demonstrating a clear distinction between D-PET and GC-PET systems. Background variability was largest for GC-PET systems; the relative error of attenuation and scatter correction was significantly correlated with image quality for D-PET systems only. The study demonstrated considerable differences in image quality not only between GC-PET and D-PET systems but also between individual D-PET systems with possible consequences for clinical interpretation of images and measurement of quantitative indices such as the standardized uptake value. The study provided valuable feedback to the participants as well as baseline data for improving interchangeability of PET images and of quantitative indices between different laboratories.
Y-chromosomal STR haplotypes were determined from a sample of 135 unrelated men and 70 sons from Tirol (Austria) using the AmpFlSTR Yfiler PCR amplification kit (Applied Biosystems) that coamplifies 17 Y-STRs. The panel of markers includes the 9-loci European minimal haplotype (minHt) and, in addition, the markers DYS437, DYS438, DYS439, DYS448, DYS456, DYS458, DYS635 (Y GATA C4) and Y GATA H4. A total of 130 different haplotypes (125 were unique) were identified by the 17 Y-STR markers, an increase of 19 compared with the minHt. The gene diversity of DYS635, DYS456 and DYS458 exceeded 0.75 and only that of the duplicated marker DYS385 (0.86) was higher. Consistently high haplotype diversity values were found in all tested Y-SNP haplogroups. Because the simultaneous analysis of 17 Y-STR systems offers a high power of discrimination at minimum sample consumption, the Yfiler kit is a promising tool for forensic applications.