PubMed · 11561327
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
G Mansell. 2001. Using terminology correctly.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11561327/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVE: Misoprostol and sulprostone are prostaglandins that can be used for the termination of second and third trimester pregnancy. The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of both agents for the termination of second and third trimester pregnancy in cases of congenital or genetic abnormalities, and for the induction of labour in cases of intra-uterine foetal death. STUDY DESIGN: We collected data from all women who had been treated with misoprostol in the second or third trimester of pregnancy between January 2001 and July 2002 in cases of congenital or genetic abnormalities, and for the induction of labour in cases of intra-uterine foetal death. In cases where the foetus was alive, misoprostol was usually (77%) combined with mifepristone. Women were matched to women who had been treated with sulprostone for termination of second and third trimester pregnancy before 2001. We matched for hospital, previous vaginal delivery, intra-uterine death and duration of pregnancy. The primary outcome measure was time to delivery. RESULTS: Since the treatment effect was different in patients in whom labour was induced for intra-uterine death and patients in whom labour was induced while the foetus was alive, the analysis was stratified for this parameter. In 94 patients with intra-uterine death, there was no significant difference in time to delivery, blood loss, operative removal of the placenta and need for pain relief between misoprostol and sulprostone. In vital pregnancy (n = 96), time to delivery was significantly shorter in the misoprostol group. The relative risk for haemorrhage exceeding 1000 ml in this group was 0.40 (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.13-1.2). We observed no significant differences with respect to operative removal of the placenta or need for pain relief. CONCLUSION: In cases of intra-uterine death, the effectiveness of misoprostol for termination of pregnancy is comparable to that of sulprostone. In vital pregnancy, combination of mifepristone and misoprostol is more effective than sulprostone alone.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Internists care for many women who have had abortions and many who will seek abortions in the future. Each year, about 2% of all women of reproductive age have an abortion. Women having abortions tend to be young, white, unmarried, and early in pregnancy. Most abortions are done by suction curettage under local anesthesia in a freestanding clinic. However, medical abortion is growing in popularity as a nonsurgical alternative. The regimen approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration specifies mifepristone, 600 mg orally, followed 2 days later by misoprostol, 400 microg orally (within 49 days from last menses). Recent studies have recommended alternative approaches, such as mifepristone, 200 mg orally, followed in 1 to 3 days by misoprostol, 800 microg vaginally (up to 63 days). Medical abortion can be provided by a broader variety of physicians than can surgical abortion. The overall case-fatality rate for abortion is less than 1 death per 100,000 procedures. Infection, hemorrhage, acute hematometra, and retained tissue are among the more common complications. Referral back to the original abortion provider for management is advisable. Overall, induced abortion does not lead to late sequelae, either medical or psychiatric. Of importance, no link exists between induced abortion and later breast cancer. For physicians who are asked to help with a referral, the National Abortion Federation and Planned Parenthood Federation of America have helpful Web sites and networks of high-quality clinics. The cost of abortion (currently about 372 dollars at 10 weeks) has decreased in recent decades. Provision of ongoing contraception and encouragement of emergency contraception can reduce unintended pregnancies and the need for abortion.