Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 11276751

Implant surfaces and interface processes.

Abstract

The past decades and current R&D of biomaterials and medical implants show some general trends. One major trend is an increased degree of functionalization of the material surface, better to meet the demands of the biological host system. While the biomaterials of the past and those in current use are essentially bulk materials (metals, ceramics, polymers) or special compounds (bioglasses), possibly with some additional coating (e.g., hydroxyapatite), the current R&D on surface modifications points toward much more complex and multifunctional surfaces for the future. Such surface modifications can be divided into three classes, one aiming toward an optimized three-dimensional physical microarchitecture of the surface (pore size distributions, "roughness", etc.), the second one focusing on the (bio) chemical properties of surface coatings and impregnations (ion release, multi-layer coatings, coatings with biomolecules, controlled drug release, etc.), and the third one dealing with the viscoelastic properties (or more generally the micromechanical properties) of material surfaces. These properties are expected to affect the interfacial processes cooperatively, i.e., there are likely synergistic effects between and among them: The surface is "recognized" by the biological system through the combined chemical and topographic pattern of the surface, and the viscoelastic properties. In this presentation, the development indicated above is discussed briefly, and current R&D in this area is illustrated with a number of examples from our own research. The latter include micro- and nanofabrication of surface patterns and topographies by the use of laser machining, photolithographic techniques, and electron beam and colloidal lithographies to produce controlled structures on implant surfaces in the size range 10 nm to 100 microns. Examples of biochemical modifications include mono- or lipid membranes and protein coatings on different surfaces. A new method to evaluate, e.g., biomaterial-protein and biomaterial-cell interactions--the Quartz Crystal Microbalance--is described briefly.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B Kasemo, J Gold. 1999. Implant surfaces and interface processes.. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959374990130011901

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

General properties of silated hydroxyethylcellulose for potential biomedical applications.

The general properties of hydroxyethylcellulose (HEC) grafted with 3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane (GPTMS) or 3-glycidoxypropylmethyldiethoxysilane (GPDMS) were studied for potential biomedical applications. The graft involved a Williamson reaction between the free hydroxyl function of HEC and the epoxy function of the two silanes. As the grafted silanes are in ionic form (sodium silanolate), this product remains in gel form at basic pH (>12.3) in aqueous solution. When pH decreases, sodium silanolate is transformed into silanol (2 or 3 silanol functions are carried by silicon, depending on the silane grafted). The silanols interreact, and the gel is transformed into a cross-linking form at room or body temperature. Studies were conducted to optimise this product for specific uses. Steam sterilization was used to compare self-hardening as a function of the silane grafted. Our previous work indicated that HEC grafted with GPTMS has good reactivity, but requires high pH for dissolution, whereas dissolution occurs at lower pH with GPMDS. The rate of silanol condensation for silated HEC was then determined as a function of pH, temperature, type of silane, and the percentage grafted. Condensation rates were ascertained by the viscosity method, and gels were neutralized by different solutions to obtain buffered forms at various pH. The time required to obtain 10(5) mPa x s, with an initial state of 2500 mPa x s, was then calculated. Condensation was catalysed in acid or basic medium at a lower rate at pH 5.5-6.5, and a temperature rise increased the condensation rate, regardless of the pH or silane studied. Silanetriol was more reactive than silanediol. However, as HEC lost considerable viscosity after sterilization, further studies will be conducted to develop new polysaccharides grafted with silane.

Biocompatible Materials↗

Peritoneal molecular environment, adhesion formation and clinical implication.

Whether induced by infection, inflammation, ischemia, and/or surgical injury, peritoneal adhesions are the leading cause of pelvic pain, bowel obstruction and infertility. It is clear that while postsurgical peritoneal wounds heal without adhesions in some patients, others develop severe scarring from seemingly equal procedures; in addition, in the same patient, adhesions can develop at one surgical site and not in another. The mechanisms underlying the predisposition to form adhesions as well as their site specificity are completely unknown. However, a large number of intraperitoneal surgical procedures are performed each day in the USA, and thus many patients are at risk of developing postoperative adhesions. Therefore, understanding of adhesion formation at the molecular level is essential and in the absence of such information, attempts to prevent patients from developing adhesions will remain an empirical process. The unprecedented advancement in molecular biology during the past decade has led to the identification of many biologically active molecules with the potential of regulating inflammatory and immune responses, angiogenesis and tissue remodeling, events that are central to normal peritoneal wound healing and adhesion formation. Although, the insight into their importance in the development of tissue fibrosis has substantially increased, their major roles in peritoneal biological functions and adhesion formation remain at best speculative. This article reviews the clinical implications of adhesions and attempts to highlight some of the key molecules i.e. growth factors, cytokines, chemokines, proteases and extracellular matrix, that are recognized to regulate inflammation, fibrinolysis, angiogenesis, and tissue remodeling, events that are central to peritoneal wound repair and adhesion formation. Finally, the article discusses the potential application and site specific delivery of several active compounds that are developed to alter the local inflammatory and immune response i.e., cytokine/chemokine network, targeted gene delivery and development of a new generation of biomaterials to prevent adhesion formation. Such understanding of peritoneal biology not only assist us to better manage patients with adhesion, but also those with endometriosis and malignant diseases that affect the peritoneal cavity.

Biocompatible Materials↗

Biocompatibility studies on biodegradable polyester-based composites of human osteoblasts: a preliminary screening.

A series of biodegradable composites with natural hydroxyapatite, designed for possible use in orthopedics applications, were preliminarily screened for biocompatibility by employing primary cultures of human osteoblasts in a direct contact method. The cells were seeded at low density onto the materials under investigation and allowed to grow for 2 weeks. They then were analyzed for morphology, proliferation, viability, alkaline phosphatase activity (AP), osteocalcin (OC) production, and extracellular matrix mineralization. The results showed that all materials have good biocompatibility. Cell viability tests demonstrated that in all cases the values were comparable to the control, and the addition of hydroxyapatite always resulted in an enhancement of performance with respect to the plain polymer. AP and OC analysis confirmed that all composites allowed the expression of phenotypic markers. Scanning electron microscopy provided direct evidence of intense cell adhesion and proliferation on the tested materials.

Biocompatible Materials↗