Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11129473

Bivariate binary data analysis with nonignorably missing outcomes.

M C Paik·R Sacco·I F Lin
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

One of the objectives in the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study is to investigate the impact of stroke subtype on the functional status 2 years after the first ischemic stroke. A challenge in this analysis is that the functional status at 2 years after stroke is not completely observed. In this paper, we propose a method to handle nonignorably missing binary functional status when the baseline value and the covariates are completely observed. The proposed method consists of fitting four separate binary regression models: for the baseline outcome, the outcome 2 years after the stroke, the product of the previous two, and finally, the missingness indicator. We then conduct a sensitivity analysis by varying the assumptions about the third and the fourth binary regression models. Our method belongs to an imputation paradigm and can be an alternative to the weighting method of Rotnitzky and Robins (1997, Statistics in Medicine 16, 81-102). A jackknife variance estimate is proposed for the variance of the resulting estimate. The proposed analysis can be implemented using statistical software such as SAS.

Explore related subjects

BiometryComputer SimulationPersons with DisabilitiesEducational StatusFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleModels, StatisticalNew York CityProbabilityRacial GroupsRegression AnalysisSoftwareStrokeStroke RehabilitationTime FactorsComparative StudyJournal ArticleResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M C Paik, R Sacco, I F Lin. 2000. Bivariate binary data analysis with nonignorably missing outcomes.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.01145.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Tutorial in biostatistics: competing risks and multi-state models.

Standard survival data measure the time span from some time origin until the occurrence of one type of event. If several types of events occur, a model describing progression to each of these competing risks is needed. Multi-state models generalize competing risks models by also describing transitions to intermediate events. Methods to analyze such models have been developed over the last two decades. Fortunately, most of the analyzes can be performed within the standard statistical packages, but may require some extra effort with respect to data preparation and programming. This tutorial aims to review statistical methods for the analysis of competing risks and multi-state models. Although some conceptual issues are covered, the emphasis is on practical issues like data preparation, estimation of the effect of covariates, and estimation of cumulative incidence functions and state and transition probabilities. Examples of analysis with standard software are shown.

Biometry↗
PubMed2007

The role of education in biostatistical consulting.

Medical students, residents, postdoctoral fellows, and faculty commonly consult with biostatistical experts about study design and data analysis when conducting clinical research. The role of biostatistical training during these consultations is examined, and characterizations of the connections between biostatistical consultation and education are reviewed. The presence and kinds of teaching efforts during biostatistical consults at four academic research institutions over various periods of time between 1999 and 2005 (237 consultations in total) were recorded and are described. By site, 67, 70, 78, and 100 per cent of the consulting sessions included biostatistical training, with an overall 78 per cent (95 per cent CI: 73-83 per cent) of consultations including an educational component when all consultations were combined. Training covered a wide range of biostatistical topics. Seventy-five per cent of the consultations with faculty (120/161), 79 per cent with fellows and residents (31/39), and 100 per cent with medical students (10/10) included some degree of instruction in study design or statistical analysis topics. Results show that both the need and the opportunity exist for specialized biostatistical instruction during one-on-one sessions between a consulting biostatistician and physicians, medical students, and research staff. Academic researchers are ideally positioned to absorb this kind of training when they initiate a request for assistance with their own research project.

Biometry↗
PubMed2007

Improving the quality of patient care using reliability measures: a classification tree approach.

This paper considers the application and interpretation of new reliability measures for a classification tree-based medical risk assessment tool. Following the construction of a classification tree reliability measures may then be used to provide an estimate of the precision of the classification and the probability in each terminal node of the classification tree. Identification of unreliable nodes (those that have low precision) in this application may indicate patient groups requiring closer monitoring or scenarios in which further information about the patient is required, thereby providing medical practitioners with an avenue for more informed decision making.

Biometry↗