Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 11094809

Dipole location errors in electroencephalogram source analysis due to volume conductor model errors.

Abstract

An examination is made of dipole location errors in electroencephalogram (EEG) source analysis, due to not incorporating the ventricular system (VS), omitting a hole in the skull and underestimating skull conductivity. The simulations are performed for a large number of test dipoles in 3D using the finite difference method. The maximum dipole location error encountered, utilising 27 and 53 electrodes is 7.6 mm and 6.1 mm, respectively when omitting the VS, 5.6 mm and 5.2 mm, respectively when neglecting the hole in the skull, and 33.4 mm and 28.0 mm, respectively when underestimating skull conductivity. The largest location errors due to neglecting the VS can be found in the vicinity of the VS. The largest location errors due to omitting a hole can be found in the vicinity of the hole. At these positions the fitted dipoles are found close to the hole. When skull conductivity is underestimated, the dipole is fitted close to the skull-brain border in a radial direction for all test dipoles. It was found that the location errors due to underestimating skull conductivity are typically higher than those found due to neglecting the VS or neglecting a hole in the skull.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B Vanrumste, G Van Hoey, R Van de Walle, M D'Havé, I Lemahieu, P Boon. 2000. Dipole location errors in electroencephalogram source analysis due to volume conductor model errors.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02345748

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Conductance-controlled point functionalization of single-walled carbon nanotubes.

We used covalent attachments to single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) to fabricate single-molecule electronic devices. The technique does not rely on submicrometer lithography or precision mechanical manipulation, but instead uses circuit conductance to monitor and control covalent attachment to an electrically connected SWNT. Discrete changes in the circuit conductance revealed chemical processes happening in real time and allowed the SWNT sidewalls to be deterministically broken, reformed, and conjugated to target species. By controlling the chemistry through electronically controlled electrochemical potentials, we were able to achieve single chemical attachments. We routinely functionalized pristine, defect-free SWNTs at one, two, or more sites and demonstrated three-terminal devices in which a single attachment controls the electronic response.

Electric Conductivity↗

A model explaining genotypic and ontogenetic variation of leaf photosynthetic rate in rice (Oryza sativa) based on leaf nitrogen content and stomatal conductance.

BACKGROUNDS AND AIMS: Identification of physiological traits associated with leaf photosynthetic rate (Pn) is important for improving potential productivity of rice (Oryza sativa). The objectives of this study were to develop a model which can explain genotypic variation and ontogenetic change of Pn in rice under optimal conditions as a function of leaf nitrogen content per unit area (N) and stomatal conductance (g(s)), and to quantify the effects of interaction between N and g(s) on the variation of Pn. METHODS: Pn, N and g(s) were measured at different developmental stages for the topmost fully expanded leaves in ten rice genotypes with diverse backgrounds grown in pots (2002) and in the field (2001 and 2002). A model of Pn that accounts for carboxylation and CO diffusion processes, and assumes that the ratio of internal conductance to g(s) is constant, was constructed, and its goodness of fit was examined. KEY RESULTS: Considerable genotypic differences in Pn were evident for rice throughout development in both the pot and field experiments. The genotypic variation of Pn was correlated with that of g(s) at a given stage, and the change of Pn with plant development was closely related to the change of N. The variation of g(s) among genotypes was independent of that of N. The model explained well the variation in Pn of the ten genotypes grown under different conditions at different developmental stages. Conclusions The response of Pn to increased N differs with g(s), and the increase in Pn of genotypes with low g(s) is smaller than that of genotypes with high g(s). Therefore, simultaneous improvements of these two traits are essential for an effective breeding of rice genotypes with increased Pn.

Electric Conductivity↗