Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 11043321

[Brachycephaly].

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K Torikai. 2000. [Brachycephaly].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11043321/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Venous air embolism during endoscopic strip craniectomy for repair of craniosynostosis in infants.

BACKGROUND: Various studies have reported an incidence of venous air embolism (VAE) as high as 82.6% during surgical procedures for craniosynostosis. There has been an increase in the use of minimally invasive, endoseopie surgical procedures, including applications for endoscopic strip craniectomy. The current study prospectively evaluated the incidence of VAF during endoscopic strip craniectomy. METHODS: Continuous, intraoperative monitoring for VAE was performed using precordial Doppler monitoring. A recording was made of the Doppler tones and later reviewed to verify its accuracy. RESULTS: The cohort for the study included 50 consecutive neonates and infants ranging in age from 3.5 to 36 weeks and ranging in weight from 3 to 9 kg. Surgical time varied from 31 to 95 min for a total of 2,701 mm of operating time, during which precordial Doppler tones were auscultated. In 46 patients, there was no evidence of VAE. In four patients, there was a single episode of VAE. Two of the episodes of VAE were grade I (change in Doppler tones), and two were grade H (change in Doppler tones and decrease in end-tidal carbon dioxide). No grade III (decrease in systolic blood pressure by 20% from baseline) VAF was noted. CONCLUSION: In addition to previously reported benefits of decreased blood loss, decreased surgical time, and improved postoperative recovery time, the authors noted a low incidence of VAF during endoscopic strip craniectomy in neonates and infants.

Craniosynostoses↗

Plasticity of the endocranial base in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis.

Limited in vivo data exist on the dysmorphology of the cranial base in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. Few studies have documented the effect of calvarial surgery for synostosis on endocranial morphology. Previous work has suggested that the dysmorphology of the endocranial base is diagnostically specific for metopic, sagittal, and unicoronal sutures. The purpose of this study was to further evaluate the endocranial base in infants with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis by testing the hypothesis that the dysmorphology is, to some degree, a secondary deformation rather than a primary malformation. Three questions were addressed: (1) Can individuals reliably identify affected suture-specific endocranial-base morphology using standard templates? (2) Does calvarial surgery in infancy for craniosynostosis affect the perception of endocranial-base morphology? and (3) Does calvarial surgery in infancy for nonsyndromic craniosynostosis normalize the endocranial base?In this study, three-dimensional volumetric reconstructions from archived computed tomography digital data were processed using the ANALYZE imaging software. Dysmorphology was assessed by nine independent, blinded skilled observers who reviewed two separate sets of images of endocranial bases. Both sets contained images from the same patients: one set contained preoperative images, and the other contained images of the endocranial base 1 year after calvarial surgery. Observers were asked to sort each set into four suture-specific diagnostic groups: normal, unicoronal, metopic, and sagittal. Each set contained 10 patients with unicoronal synostosis, 10 with metopic synostosis, 10 with sagittal synostosis, and four normal patients. Seventy-eight percent of the total number of preoperative images were correctly sorted into the suture-specific diagnostic group, whereas only 55 percent of the total number of postoperative images were correctly matched. With regard to the individual sutures, the results were as follows (data are presented as preoperative accuracy versus postoperative accuracy): metopic, 76 percent versus 44 percent; sagittal, 58 percent versus 34 percent; unicoronal, 100 percent versus 79 percent; and normal, 83 percent versus 72 percent. Although 36 of 306 total images per group (12 percent) actually represented normal patients, the observers called 72 of 306 normal (24 percent) in the preoperative set versus 110 of 306 normal (36 percent) in the postoperative set. In conclusion, (1) the endocranial dysmorphology of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis is recognizably specific to the affected suture; (2) calvarial surgery for nonsyndromic craniosynostosis normalizes the endocranial base qualitatively with regard to the diminished ability of raters to identify the primary pathology; and (3) the documented postoperative changes in endocranial base morphology after calvarial surgery for nonsyndromic craniosynostosis in infancy indicates that a major component of that dysmorphology is a secondary deformity rather than a primary malformation.

Craniosynostoses↗