Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 11042300

A second-stage partogram.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe a second-stage partogram based on a system of scoring the descent and position of the fetal head and to use this system for studying progress in the second stage of labor and predicting mode of delivery and obstetric outcome. METHODS: A prospective observational study of 1413 women at term with a singleton, cephalic presentation. The position and station of the fetal head were observed and scored at diagnosis of the second stage of labor, 1 hour later, and then at 30 minute intervals until delivery was achieved. The score at diagnosis of the second stage of labor was assessed for its ability to predict eventual mode of delivery and duration of labor. A normogram was defined for nulliparas and multiparas and was used to define normal and abnormal progress in the second stage, associated factors in the first stage of labor, and mode of delivery. RESULTS: Increasing total score at the start of the second stage of labor is associated with increasing chance of spontaneous vaginal delivery (odds ratio [OR] 1.68 for nulliparas, 1.59 for multiparas), decreasing chance of instrumental vaginal delivery (OR 0.67 for nulliparas, 0.64 for multiparas), and emergency cesarean delivery (OR 0.39 for nulliparas). Abnormal progress as defined by the normogram is associated with use of epidural anesthesia, induction of labor, augmentation, dystocia, and increased incidence of operative delivery. No significant difference is found between normal and abnormal second stages of labor in fetal outcome as determined by Apgar scores. CONCLUSION: The second-stage partogram offers an objective basis for management of the second stage of labor.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A R Sizer, J Evans, S M Bailey, J Wiener. 2000. A second-stage partogram.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(00)00981-9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effects of teamwork training on adverse outcomes and process of care in labor and delivery: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of teamwork training on the occurrence of adverse outcomes and process of care in labor and delivery. METHODS: A cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted at seven intervention and eight control hospitals. The intervention was a standardized teamwork training curriculum based on crew resource management that emphasized communication and team structure. The primary outcome was the proportion of deliveries at 20 weeks or more of gestation in which one or more adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes or both occurred (Adverse Outcome Index). Additional outcomes included 11 clinical process measures. RESULTS: A total of 1,307 personnel were trained and 28,536 deliveries analyzed. At baseline, there were no differences in demographic or delivery characteristics between the groups. The mean Adverse Outcome Index prevalence was similar in the control and intervention groups, both at baseline and after implementation of teamwork training (9.4% versus 9.0% and 7.2% versus 8.3%, respectively). The intracluster correlation coefficient was 0.015, with a resultant wide confidence interval for the difference in mean Adverse Outcome Index between groups (-5.6% to 3.2%). One process measure, the time from the decision to perform an immediate cesarean delivery to the incision, differed significantly after team training (33.3 minutes versus 21.2 minutes, P=.03). CONCLUSION: Training, as was conducted and implemented, did not transfer to a detectable impact in this study. The Adverse Outcome Index could be an important tool for comparing obstetric outcomes within and between institutions to help guide quality improvement. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: (www.ClinicalTrials.gov), NCT00381056 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Delivery, Obstetric↗