PubMed · 11012919
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
D W Lappin, H R Brady. 2000. Light from DARCness.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00346.x
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: The surface of Leishmania spp. presents glycoprotein 63 (GP63), a metalloprotease that acts as one of the parasite's major antigens. A vaccine against leishmaniasis has not yet been developed and stationary phase promastigotes have utmost importance in transmitting Leishmania spp. from phlebotomine sand fly to humans or reservoirs. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze GP63 protein in three different Leishmania spp. to determine new vaccine candidate antigen against leishmaniasis using sequencing data of locally detected Leishmania strains and in silico approaches. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The GP63 protein sequences of the stationary phase/amastigote form of L. infantum, L. major, and L. tropica were identified and then the gene encoding GP63 protein in Leishmania positive samples (n:59) was amplified and sequenced for variation analysis. According to the results, 4, 6, 19 GP63 variants were found within L. infantum, L. major, and L. tropica isolates, respectively. The most prevalent variants within each species were selected for further analysis using in silico approaches. Accordingly, all selected GP63 proteins were antigenic and the amount of B and T cell epitopes were 23 for L. infantum, 10 for L. major, and 9 for L. tropica. The analysis of each epitope showed that all of them were non-toxic, non-allergen, and soluble but had different antigenicity values. Among these epitopes, EMEDQGSAGSAGS associated with L. major, STHDSGSTTC and AEDILTDEKRDILRK epitopes associated with L. infantum had the highest antigenicity values for B cell, MHC-I, and MHC-II epitopes, respectively. Moreover, conserved epitopes were detected among two or three Leishmania species. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This study detected many epitopes that could be used in vaccine studies and the development of serological diagnostic assays.
Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related death among men in the United States. African American men have a 60% greater incidence of prostate cancer and a twofold higher mortality rate than Caucasian men. The Duffy antigen/receptor for chemokines (DARC) is a receptor expressed on erythrocytes and vascular endothelial cells that binds to and clears angiogenic chemokines. The DARC also functions as the erythrocyte receptor for invasion by malarial parasites. Approximately 70% of African Americans lack erythrocyte expression of the DARC as a genetic mechanism of protection against malaria infection. Given the importance of angiogenic chemokines in the development of tumor vascular networks and the chemokine binding properties of the DARC, the possibility that a lack of DARC expression on erythrocytes may represent an epigenetic factor that predisposes African American men to a greater incidence and mortality of prostate cancer should be considered.
Genetic variations in the CC chemokine receptor (CCR5) leading to reduced or absent expression are associated with resistance to human immunodeficiency virus infection and delayed onset of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Similarly, lack of the red-cell chemokine receptor Duffy confers protection against malarial infection by Plasmodium vivax. Investigators have previously described a missense mutation (R89C) in the first intracellular loop of Duffy that results in reduced protein expression. The present study shows that the lower Duffy expression is due to loss of the positive charge at this position, resulting in protein instability. Moreover, R60S, a mutation in the first intracellular loop of CCR5 noted in a recent cohort study, likewise results in reduced surface expression and function of CCR5. The presence of a homologous, naturally occurring mutation that may be protective against disease thus defines a novel mechanism accounting for the decreased expression of these receptors in some individuals. (Blood. 2001;97:3651-3654)