Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10986903

[Computer-assisted surgery].

F Gebhard·L Kinzl·M Arand
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The term "computer-assisted surgery" (CAS) contains a variety of different applications. Priorities in trauma surgery have navigation systems. In fact, two basically different developments can be distinguished: on one hand, the possibility of navigation, based on preoperative CT data sets; and on the other hand navigation in intraoperative C-arm images. With the present available navigation technology, it can be assumed that intraoperative CT-based tracking in the field of spinal surgery can be performed accurately, regardless of whether active or passive markers are used. Another navigation option is C-arm-based osteosynthesis of the proximal femur. An application of navigation assistance in the field of pelvic surgery is osteotomy and placement of iliosacral screws. Future developments will have to concentrate on the technical characteristics of each navigation system. Advantageous concepts of visualization may generate required information to the surgeon in a way that unconstrained interaction at the operation table is combined with simultaneous integration of virtual and computer-aided visual information. New tracking systems will allow the reconstruction of data sets after reposition of segmented bone fragments, so that also in complex pelvic fractures the implantation of screws after reposition will be possible. Computer-aided surgery is able to improve the precision of operations in trauma surgery. In future, further developments of navigation systems can be expected. This fact is supported by the establishment of faster and cheaper hardware, as well as more intelligent and user-friendly software.

Explore related subjects

Bone ScrewsCervical VertebraeComputer SystemsGeneral SurgeryHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeurosurgeryOrthopedicsOsteotomyPelvic BonesSoftwareSpinal FracturesSpineTherapy, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographyWounds and InjuriesX-Ray Intensifying ScreensComparative StudyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F Gebhard, L Kinzl, M Arand. 2000. [Computer-assisted surgery].. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001130050593

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2001

Lumbar cauda equina syndrome associated with the use of gelfoam: case report.

STUDY DESIGN: A case of cauda equina syndrome is reported. OBJECTIVE: To recognize a serious complication related to the use of Gelfoam in the lumbar spine. SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND DATA: Absorbable hemostatic gelatin sponges have long been used to control bleeding around the spinal cord. Despite widespread use and a safe history with few reported adverse reactions, Gelfoam sponges have potential for complications that may be overlooked. METHOD: A case of cauda equina syndrome is reported and discussed. RESULTS: A retained Gelfoam sponge was found in the epidural space after lumbar decompression and fusion for spinal stenosis. The retained gelatin sponge had expanded and solidified, causing a mass affect. The resultant nerve compression led to progressive myelopathy. On removal of the Gelfoam, symptoms rapidly resolved. CONCLUSIONS: Although the use of Gelfoam in spine surgery generally is considered safe, care must be taken to avoid placing a large mass of sponge in a potentially closed space. If Gelfoam is not handled properly, it can engorge and fail to be resorbed appropriately, thus causing a mass effect. If neurologic compromise develops, Gelfoam should be considered a potential cause and subsequently removed.

Bone Screws↗
PubMed2001

[Which screw?].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Bone Screws↗
PubMed2001

Transpedicular screw placement: image-guided versus lateral-view fluoroscopy: in vitro simulation.

STUDY DESIGN: In vitro evaluation of monitoring screw placement using an image-guided system compared with the routine use of an image intensifier. OBJECTIVES: To compare a new computer-guided method of monitoring pedicle screw placement with a well-known method of monitoring using an image intensifier, using measurements of screw placement time and accuracy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pedicle screw placement relies on the identification of anatomic landmarks for the point of entry of the pedicle. The direction and depth of screw penetration are guided by an intraoperative lateral-view image intensifier. The use of frameless stereotaxy for computer-aided pedicle screw placement may increase the accuracy and safety of the screw insertion. To the authors' knowledge, there are no published data comparing these systems on the basis of operative time and screw placement accuracy. METHOD: Eight human cadaveric sections of five vertebrae each were used for an in vitro simulation of pedicle screw placement. Four spine surgeons were chosen to simulate the transpedicular screw placement. Each surgeon placed one screw into each pedicle of two spine sections (10 vertebrae, 20 screws). The surgeon was assisted by the lateral-view image intensifier on one spine section and by the navigational system on the second one. The four surgeons placed 80 pedicle screws. Forty screw placements were monitored by fluoroscopy and 40 by the image-guided navigational system. The time spent to place one screw was recorded, as well as the remarks by each surgeons on each method. Spines were rescanned, and the positions of the screws were compared between the group on which the image intensifier has been used and the group on which the navigational system had been used. RESULTS: In the image-guided technique group, one thoracic screw disrupted the lateral cortex of the pedicle, the average distance to the anterior wall of the body was 5 mm, and the average time for the insertion of one screw was 13.5 minutes. In the other group, two screws disrupted the inner cortex of a thoracic pedicle, the average distance to the anterior wall was 10.7 mm, and the average time for the insertion of one screw was 4 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: In vitro computer-aided pedicle screw insertion is more accurate than lateral-view fluoroscopy in the thoracic spine. The main disadvantage is the time consumption compared with that required by lateral-view fluoroscopy. The total time of the surgical operation should be decreased with the future development of these techniques.

Bone Screws↗