Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10869016

Fast probabilistic analysis of sequence function using scoring matrices.

Abstract

MOTIVATION: We present techniques for increasing the speed of sequence analysis using scoring matrices. Our techniques are based on calculating, for a given scoring matrix, the quantile function, which assigns a probability, or p, value to each segmental score. Our techniques also permit the user to specify a p threshold to indicate the desired trade-off between sensitivity and speed for a particular sequence analysis. The resulting increase in speed should allow scoring matrices to be used more widely in large-scale sequencing and annotation projects. RESULTS: We develop three techniques for increasing the speed of sequence analysis: probability filtering, lookahead scoring, and permuted lookahead scoring. In probability filtering, we compute the score threshold that corresponds to the user-specified p threshold. We use the score threshold to limit the number of segments that are retained in the search process. In lookahead scoring, we test intermediate scores to determine whether they will possibly exceed the score threshold. In permuted lookahead scoring, we score each segment in a particular order designed to maximize the likelihood of early termination. Our two lookahead scoring techniques reduce substantially the number of residues that must be examined. The fraction of residues examined ranges from 62 to 6%, depending on the p threshold chosen by the user. These techniques permit sequence analysis with scoring matrices at speeds that are several times faster than existing programs. On a database of 12 177 alignment blocks, our techniques permit sequence analysis at a speed of 225 residues/s for a p threshold of 10-6, and 541 residues/s for a p threshold of 10-20. In order to compute the quantile function, we may use either an independence assumption or a Markov assumption. We measure the effect of first- and second-order Markov assumptions and find that they tend to raise the p value of segments, when compared with the independence assumption, by average ratios of 1.30 and 1.69, respectively. We also compare our technique with the empirical 99. 5th percentile scores compiled in the BLOCKSPLUS database, and find that they correspond on average to a p value of 1.5 x 10-5. AVAILABILITY: The techniques described above are implemented in a software package called EMATRIX. This package is available from the authors for free academic use or for licensed commercial use. The EMATRIX set of programs is also available on the Internet at http://motif.stanford.edu/ematrix.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T D Wu, C G Nevill-Manning, D L Brutlag. 2000. Fast probabilistic analysis of sequence function using scoring matrices.. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics%2F16.3.233

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

MUMMALS: multiple sequence alignment improved by using hidden Markov models with local structural information.

We have developed MUMMALS, a program to construct multiple protein sequence alignment using probabilistic consistency. MUMMALS improves alignment quality by using pairwise alignment hidden Markov models (HMMs) with multiple match states that describe local structural information without exploiting explicit structure predictions. Parameters for such models have been estimated from a large library of structure-based alignments. We show that (i) on remote homologs, MUMMALS achieves statistically best accuracy among several leading aligners, such as ProbCons, MAFFT and MUSCLE, albeit the average improvement is small, in the order of several percent; (ii) a large collection (>10 000) of automatically computed pairwise structure alignments of divergent protein domains is superior to smaller but carefully curated datasets for estimation of alignment parameters and performance tests; (iii) reference-independent evaluation of alignment quality using sequence alignment-dependent structure superpositions correlates well with reference-dependent evaluation that compares sequence-based alignments to structure-based reference alignments.

Markov Chains↗

Convergence properties of the degree distribution of some growing network models.

In this article we study a class of randomly grown graphs that includes some preferential attachment and uniform attachment models, as well as some evolving graph models that have been discussed previously in the literature. The degree distribution is assumed to form a Markov chain; this gives a particularly simple form for a stochastic recursion of the degree distribution. We show that for this class of models the empirical degree distribution tends almost surely and in norm to the expected degree distribution as the size of the graph grows to infinity and we provide a simple asymptotic expression for the expected degree distribution. Convergence of the empirical degree distribution has consequences for statistical analysis of network data in that it allows the full data to be summarized by the degree distribution of the nodes without losing the ability to obtain consistent estimates of parameters describing the network.

Markov Chains↗

Proteins QSAR with Markov average electrostatic potentials.

Classic physicochemical and topological indices have been largely used in small molecules QSAR but less in proteins QSAR. In this study, a Markov model is used to calculate, for the first time, average electrostatic potentials xik for an indirect interaction between aminoacids placed at topologic distances k within a given protein backbone. The short-term average stochastic potential xi1 for 53 Arc repressor mutants was used to model the effect of Alanine scanning on thermal stability. The Arc repressor is a model protein of relevance for biochemical studies on bioorganics and medicinal chemistry. A linear discriminant analysis model developed correctly classified 43 out of 53, 81.1% of proteins according to their thermal stability. More specifically, the model classified 20/28, 71.4% of proteins with near wild-type stability and 23/25, 92.0% of proteins with reduced stability. Moreover, predictability in cross-validation procedures was of 81.0%. Expansion of the electrostatic potential in the series xi0, xi1, xi2, and xi3, justified the use of the abrupt truncation approach, being the overall accuracy >70.0% for xi0 but equal for xi1, xi2, and xi3. The xi1 model compared favorably with respect to others based on D-Fire potential, surface area, volume, partition coefficient, and molar refractivity, with less than 77.0% of accuracy [Ramos de Armas, R.; González-Díaz, H.; Molina, R.; Uriarte, E. Protein Struct. Func. Bioinf.2004, 56, 715]. The xi1 model also has more tractable interpretation than others based on Markovian negentropies and stochastic moments. Finally, the model is notably simpler than the two models based on quadratic and linear indices. Both models, reported by Marrero-Ponce et al., use four-to-five time more descriptors. Introduction of average stochastic potentials may be useful for QSAR applications; having xik amenable physical interpretation and being very effective.

Markov Chains↗