Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10835857

Hypothesis testing (Part I).

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Indrayan, P Gupta. Hypothesis testing (Part I).. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10835857/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Teaching hypothesis tests--time for significant change?

Confusion in the teaching of statistical inference dates back to the conflict of Fisher's P-values and significance tests with the Neyman-Pearson hypothesis testing approach. To avoid the well-known pitfalls arising from over-reliance on significance tests and the division of results into 'significant' or 'not significant', many medical journals now insist that presentation of statistical analyses includes confidence intervals as well as or instead of P-values. The confusion over how to report statistical analyses which is evident in the recent medical literature is matched by divergent teaching of hypothesis tests between the 16 U.K. medical schools represented at the April 2000 Burwalls meeting. Suggested guidelines for the teaching of statistical inference to medical students are presented, and possible future developments are discussed.

Confidence Intervals↗

A quasi-exact method for the confidence intervals of the difference of two independent binomial proportions in small sample cases.

In this paper we propose a quasi-exact alternative to the exact unconditional method by Chan and Zhang (1999) estimating confidence intervals for the difference of two independent binomial proportions in small sample cases. The quasi-exact method is an approximation to a modified version of Chan and Zhang's method, where the two-sided p-value of an observation is defined by adding to the one-sided p-value the sum of all probabilities of more "extreme" events in the unobserved tail. We show that distinctively less conservative interval estimates can be derived following the modified definition of the two-sided p-value. The approximations applied in the quasi-exact method help to simplify the computations greatly, while the resulting infringements to the nominal level are low. Compared with other approximate methods, including the mid-p quasi-exact methods and the Miettinen and Nurminen (M&N) asymptotic method, our quasi-exact method demonstrates much better reliability in small sample cases.

Confidence Intervals↗