Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10693083

Total ankle replacement revisited.

C L Saltzman·T E McIff·J A Buckwalter·T D Brown
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The surgical treatment of painful, end-stage ankle arthritis includes ankle arthrodesis and total ankle replacement. In the past decade, total ankle replacement has become a viable alternative to ankle arthrodesis. Modern implant designs either involve a syndesmosis fusion and resurfacing of the medial and lateral recesses of the ankle joint or the use of a 3-component, mobile bearing implant. In limited clinical series, the early results of both these prosthetic design approaches are encouraging. In selected patients, ankle arthroplasty is an effective approach to relieving pain and improving function. The purposes of this paper are to review the clinical results from total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis; discuss indications, contraindications, design features, postoperative rehabilitation, and initial results for the major current total ankle designs; and present concepts for future total ankle development. In particular, this article explores the advantages and concerns with 2 prevalent but different design approaches. It also discusses future directions for total ankle replacement.

Explore related subjects

Ankle JointArthrodesisArthroplasty, ReplacementHumansJoint ProsthesisOsteoarthritisProsthesis DesignRadiographyRange of Motion, ArticularJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C L Saltzman, T E McIff, J A Buckwalter, T D Brown. 2000. Total ankle replacement revisited.. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2000.30.2.56

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2004

[Magnetic resonance in osteoarticular exploration].

A major role in imaging of the locomotor apparatus. Today, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has replaced invasive explorations such as arthrography or saccoradiculography. However, x-rays and scans must often be performed beforehand. Indisputable indications. MRI is crucial in affections of the spongy bone (tumours, osteonecrosis, algodystrophy, fatigue fractures.) and the soft parts (tumours, myositis, fasciitis.). Depending on the situation. The indications for MRI must be weighed versus a scan or arthro-scan in many situations. In the case of strong suspicion of an internal articular disorder, the arthro-scan currently more precise must be preferred. In cases in which there is little clinical orientation, the MRI is justified because of its capacity for global articular and abarticular exploration.

Ankle Joint↗
PubMed2004

Femoral loads during passive, active, and active-resistive stance after spinal cord injury: a mathematical model.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the loading environment for the distal femur during a novel standing exercise paradigm for people with spinal cord injury. DESIGN: A mathematical model based on experimentally derived parameters. BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal deterioration is common after spinal cord injury, often resulting in osteoporotic bone and increased risk of lower extremity fracture. Potential mechanical treatments have yet to be shown to be efficacious; however, no previous attempts have been made to quantify the lower extremity loading during passive, active, and active-resistive stance. METHODS: A static, 2-D model was developed to estimate the external forces; the activated quadriceps forces; and the overall bone compression and shear forces in the distal femur during passive (total support of frame), active (quadriceps activated minimally), and active-resistive (quadriceps activated against a resistance) stance. RESULTS: Passive, active, and active-resistive stance resulted in maximal distal femur compression estimates of approximately 45%, approximately 75%, and approximately 240% of body weight, respectively. Quadriceps force estimates peaked at 190% of body weight with active-resistive stance. The distal femur shear force estimates never exceeded 24% of body weight with any form of stance. CONCLUSIONS: These results support our hypothesis that active-resistive stance induces the highest lower extremity loads of the three stance paradigms, while keeping shear to a minimum. RELEVANCE: This model allows clinicians to better understand the lower extremity forces resulting from passive, active, and active-resistive stance in individuals with spinal cord injury.

Ankle Joint↗
PubMed2004

Arthrodesis of the ankle joint.

Arthrodesis of the ankle that uses lag screws for internal fixation is a safe and biomechanically stable method to obtain a solid ankle fusion; it generates good to excellent results in most patients. Prompt bone healing can be expected and allows a functional rehabilitation with full weight bearing. The surgical technique can be simplified further when using cannulated screws. Malalignment hazards while doing the ankle fusion are minimized by respecting the shape of the ankle mortise because no osteotomy of the lateral malleolus is performed. Generally, removal of the implanted material is not necessary. Major complications such as infection, stress fractures, or nonunion were not seen in our series. A meticulous resection of all cartilage and sclerotic bone and an atraumatic surgical technique are essential for preventing those major complications. The need for revision surgery is minimized by correction of talar malalignment, fusion with the ankle in a 90 degrees position, and preoperative evaluation of the subtalar joint. External fixation methods are used in cases of osteitis, osteonecrosis, osteoporosis, and poor soft tissue conditions. With severe loss of bone stock at the distal tibia, stability can be achieved by using an intramedullary nail for ankle fusion.

Ankle Joint↗