PubMed · 10630847
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
D N Juurlink, S Ito. 1999. Comment: clarithromycin-digoxin interaction.. https://doi.org/10.1177/106002809903301204
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
MDR1 P-glycoprotein (P-gp), the multidrug resistance-associated transmembrane transporter, is physiologically expressed by human peripheral immune cells, but its role in cell-mediated immunity remains poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate a novel role for P-gp in alloantigen-dependent human T cell activation. The pharmacologic P-gp inhibitor tamoxifen (1-10 microM) and the MDR1 P-gp-specific mAb Hyb-241 (1-20 microg/ml), which detected surface P-gp on 21% of human CD3(+) T cells and 84% of CD14(+) APCs in our studies, inhibited alloantigen-dependent, but not mitogen-dependent, T cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner from 40-90% (p < 0.01). The specific inhibitory effect on alloimmune T cell activation was associated with >85% inhibition (p < 0.01) of IL-2, IFN-gamma, and TNF-alpha production in 48-h MLR coculture supernatants. Addition of recombinant human IL-2 (0.1-10 ng/ml) restored proliferation in tamoxifen-treated cocultures. Pretreatment of purified CD4(+) T cells with Hyb-241 mAb before coculture resulted in inhibition of CD4(+) T cellular IFN-gamma secretion. Also, blockade of P-gp on allogeneic APCs inhibited IL-12 secretion. Taken together these results demonstrate that P-gp is functional on both CD4(+) T cells and CD14(+) APCs, and that P-gp blockade may attenuate both IFN-gamma and IL-12 through a positive feedback loop. Our results define a novel role for P-gp in alloimmunity and thus raise the intriguing possibility that P-gp may represent a novel therapeutic target in allograft rejection.
Paclitaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy is reported to be a platelet-sparing drug combination. This study investigated potential mechanisms for this observation by studying the effects of paclitaxel and carboplatin on (1) normal donor and chemotherapy patient-derived erythroid (burst-forming units-erythroid [BFU-E]), myeloid (colony-forming units-granulocyte/macrophage [CFU-GM]), and megakaryocyte (CFU-Meg) progenitor cell growth; (2) P-glycoprotein (P-gp) protein and glutathione S-transferase (GST) messenger RNA (mRNA) expression; (3) serum thrombopoietin (Tpo), stem cell factor (SCF), interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-11, IL-1beta, IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha levels in patients treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin; and (4) stromal cell production of Tpo and SCF after paclitaxel and carboplatin exposure. CFU-Meg were more resistant to paclitaxel alone, or in combination with carboplatin, than CFU-GM and BFU-E. Although all progenitors expressed P-gp protein and GST mRNA, verapamil treatment significantly, and selectively, increased the toxicity of paclitaxel and carboplatin to CFU-Meg, suggesting an important role for P-gp in megakaryocyte drug resistance. Compared to normal controls, serum Tpo levels in patients receiving paclitaxel and carboplatin were significantly elevated 5 hours after infusion and remained elevated at day 7 (287% +/- 63% increase, P <.001). Marrow stroma was shown to be the likely source of this Tpo. It is concluded here that P-gp-mediated efflux of paclitaxel, and perhaps GST-mediated detoxification of carboplatin, results in relative sparing of CFU-Meg, which may then respond to locally high levels of stromal cell-derived Tpo. The confluence of these events might lead to the platelet-sparing phenomenon observed in patients treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy.
PURPOSE: PSC 833 (valspodar) is a second-generation P-glycoprotein (Pgp) antagonist developed to reverse multidrug resistance. We conducted a phase I study of a 7-day oral administration of PSC 833 in combination with paclitaxel, administered as a 96-hour continuous infusion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with advanced cancer were enrolled onto the trial. PSC 833 was administered orally for 7 days, beginning 72 hours before the start of the paclitaxel infusion. Paclitaxel dose reductions were planned because of the pharmacokinetic interactions known to occur with PSC 833. RESULTS: In combination with PSC 833, maximum-tolerated doses were defined as paclitaxel 13.1 mg/m(2)/d continuous intravenous infusion (CIVI) for 4 days without filgrastim, and paclitaxel 17.5 mg/m(2)/d CIVI for 4 days with filgrastim support. Dose-limiting toxicity for the combination was neutropenia. Statistical analysis of cohorts revealed similar mean steady-state concentrations (C(pss)) and areas under the concentration-versus-time curve (AUCs) when patients received paclitaxel doses of 13.1 or 17.5 mg/m(2)/d for 4 days with PSC 833, as when they received a paclitaxel dose of 35 mg/m(2)/d for 4 days without PSC 833. However, the effect of PSC 833 on paclitaxel pharmacokinetics varied greatly among individual patients, although a surrogate assay using CD56+ cells suggested inhibition of Pgp was complete or nearly complete at low concentrations of PSC 833. Responses occurred in three of four patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, and clinical benefit occurred in five of 10 patients with ovarian carcinoma. CONCLUSION: PSC 833 in combination with paclitaxel can be administered safely to patients provided the paclitaxel dose is reduced to compensate for the pharmacokinetic interaction. Surrogate studies with CD56+ cells indicate that the maximum-tolerated dose for PSC 833 gives serum levels much higher than those required to block Pgp. The variability in paclitaxel pharmacokinetics, despite complete inhibition of Pgp in the surrogate assay, suggests that other mechanisms, most likely related to P450, contribute to the pharmacokinetic interaction. Future development of combinations such as this should include strategies to predict pharmacokinetics of the chemotherapeutic agent. This in turn will facilitate dosing to achieve comparable CPss and AUCs.