Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10622850

Helicopter loading time study: hot versus cold.

D Deimling·R DeJarnette·M Rouse·R Holleran·C Downing·S Carleton
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Historically our program has used the practice of hot-loading at scenes as a time-saving measure. This practice potentially exposes patients and health care personnel to a variety of risks. Currently no data exist supporting the use of hot-loading as a time-saving technique. We prospectively studied load times and scene times for both hot- and cold-loading methods. METHODS: Hot- or cold-loading methods were randomized according to odd or even days of the month for scene runs. Both loading times and total scene times were recorded. An ANOVA was used to compare the times, taking into consideration the aircraft in use (BO 105 or BK 117). RESULTS: A total of 104 flights were entered into the study. For loading time, hot-loading showed a statistically significant difference (F [1,100] = 112.84, P = 0.000). Means for hot- and cold-loading times are 3.071 and 5.033 minutes, respectively. The interaction effect of aircraft and loading method also was significant (F [1,100] = 4.637, P = 0.034). The BO 105 (on high skids) was slower to hot-load. In contrast, the BK 117 (additional pretakeoff system checks) was slower to cold-load. The type of aircraft alone showed no effect on loading time. Total scene times were evaluated using the same procedures. A statistically significant difference also was found for the effect of hot-loading on total scene time (F [1,100] = 11.391, P = 0.001). Means for hot and cold total scene times are 10.54 and 13.615 minutes, respectively. CONCLUSION: Hot-loading does decrease our program's overall scene times. The clinical significance of this procedure was not evaluated.

Explore related subjects

Air AmbulancesAnalysis of VarianceConfidence IntervalsEvaluation Studies as TopicOhioProspective StudiesTime and Motion StudiesTransportation of PatientsUnited StatesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Deimling, R DeJarnette, M Rouse, R Holleran, C Downing, S Carleton. Helicopter loading time study: hot versus cold.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1067-991x(99)90027-5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Endotracheal intracuff pressures in the ED and prehospital setting: is there a problem?

INTRODUCTION: Cuffed endotracheal tubes are used to prevent gas leak and also pulmonary aspiration in ventilated patients. The pressure exerted on the tracheal wall is similar to intracuff pressure. The perfusion pressure for the tracheal mucosa is 40 cm H(2)O. Cuff pressures greater than 40 cm H(2)O may cause various ischemic changes and complications. High cuff pressures have also been implicated in postoperative sore throat and nonischemic complications. Postintubation endotracheal tube cuff pressures are not routinely measured in the ED or prehospital setting. The time spent in these settings may be long enough for pressure-induced tracheal mucosal injury to occur. The purpose of this study is to assess cuff pressures in intubated patients before aeromedical transport. METHODS: All intubated patients transported by an aeromedical transport program during a 3-month period were included in this study. Patients were intubated either by helicopter physicians or before helicopter arrival at the referring hospital or by ambulance personnel. Cuff pressure was measured using a manometer (Cuffpressure, Posey Co, USA). This measurement was recorded, and correction was performed, if necessary, to achieve a cuff pressure of 14 to 27 cm H(2)O while preventing an air leak. Data were analyzed for the distribution of intracuff pressures and incidence of elevated pressure on first measurement and the need for correction. RESULTS: There were 62 patients in this study. The mean first recorded pressure was 63 +/- 34 cm H(2)O. Initial cuff pressures were greater than 40 cm H(2)O in 36 (58%) patients and required correction. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, most cuff pressures exceeded safe pressure and required correction. Measurement of intracuff pressure is a simple and inexpensive procedure and should be done whenever a patient is intubated, in either the prehospital or hospital setting, because this may reduce long-term morbidity.

Air Ambulances↗
PubMed2006

Aero-medical evacuation with interventional lung assist in lung failure patients.

OBJECTIVE: Acute respiratory failure can make long distance transport by air extremely difficult. Despite pressurised cabins, the pressure will fall to about three quarters of one atmosphere, and the oxygen partial pressure will fall proportionally. Interventional lung assist (iLA) is a well documented treatment in the critical care unit, but has not been evaluated scientifically in long range aero-medical evacuation. The present animal study was performed to test the feasibility of treating lung failure with iLA during intercontinental air evacuation in a military setting. METHODS: Eight adult female pigs were cannulated in the right axillary artery and the right jugular vein. An arterio-venous iLA device (Novalung) was connected. The ventilator was adjusted to below half of the needed minute volume before the use of iLA. The animals went through different modalities of transportation in ambulances, helicopters and aircraft. Two of the pigs were tested in a hypobaric chamber, and the remaining two animals underwent a 7.5 h intercontinental transportation from Denmark to Greenland in a Hercules C130J transport airplane. RESULTS: It was possible to maintain physiological PaCO(2) and PaO(2) in normal flight altitudes with iLA. Compared to pump-driven ECMO systems iLA is safer and more efficient. The current study demonstrates the feasibility of iLA during military aero-medical evacuation.

Air Ambulances↗