Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10615451

Accommodative error, adaptation and myopia.

Abstract

Accommodative adaptation, resulting from the sustained output of slow blur-driven accommodation during the course of a sustained near-vision task, has generally been assessed under open-loop conditions. This study examined whether adaptation influences closed-loop accommodation during the course of a sustained near-vision task. Accommodative adaptation was assessed in 18 fully-corrected subjects by comparing pre- and post-task values of dark accommodation recorded objectively with an infra-red optometer. Subjects performed a continuous 10 min binocular near-vision task at a viewing distance of 33 cm, with the within-task accommodative response being assessed at 1 min intervals during this period. Subjects were categorized into adaptors (N = 11) and non-adaptors (N = 7) on the basis of whether their initial 10 sec post-task adaptation exceeded +0.30D. The adapting group exhibited a significant decline in the lag of accommodation during the first 3 min of the near-task, whereas no significant change in the within-task response over time was observed in the non-adapting group. These results indicate that accommodative adaptation increases the accuracy of the within-task, closed-loop accommodative response. Furthermore, we speculate that a deficit in accommodative adaptation, being accompanied by increased retinal defocus during near fixation, may contribute to the development of nearwork-induced myopia.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Rosenfield, B Gilmartin. 1999. Accommodative error, adaptation and myopia.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1475-1313.1999.00419.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Scopolamine bioavailability in combined oral and transdermal delivery.

Transdermal therapeutic system scopolamine (TTS-S) is effective in preventing motion sickness for 72 h. However, by this route a prophylactic effect is obtained 6 to 8 h postapplication. By the oral route, scopolamine is effective within 0.5 h for a period of 6 h. To achieve safe as well as effective protection against seasickness during the first hours of a voyage until the TTS-S patch takes effect, the pharmacokinetics of scopolamine was investigated after patch application in combination with oral tablets, 0.6 mg, 0. 3 mg, or placebo. Subjects were 25 naval-crew volunteers, randomly divided into three groups: group 1 (n = 9), TTS-S patch + 0.6 mg of scopolamine per os (p.o.); group 2 (n = 8), TTS-S patch + 0.3 mg of scopolamine p.o.; and group 3 (n = 8), TTS-S patch + placebo tablet. Blood samples were collected before treatment and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 6, 8, and 22 h post-treatment, and were analyzed for scopolamine levels using radioreceptor assay. Significantly higher plasma scopolamine levels were found in group 1 at 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2.5 h, and in group 2 at 1 and 1.5 h post-treatment, compared with group 3. Thereafter, plasma levels did not differ significantly between the groups. In all subjects of group 1 and seven subjects (88%) of group 2, therapeutic levels (>50 pg/ml) were measured during the first 2.5 h, compared with only two subjects (25%) of group 3 (P < 0.05). Heart rate, blood pressure, visual accommodation, performance test results, and subjective complaints of adverse effects did not differ significantly. The combination of transdermal and oral scopolamine (0.3 or 0.6 mg) provides the required plasma levels to prevent seasickness, starting as early as 0.5 h post-treatment, with no significant adverse effects.

Accommodation, Ocular↗

Accommodation and refractive error in children with Down syndrome: cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.

PURPOSE: To examine the relationship between defective accommodation and refractive errors in children with Down syndrome. METHODS: Children with Down syndrome aged 4 to 85 months were seen at their homes as part of an ongoing study of visual development. Seventy-five children contributed cross-sectional data and 69 children longitudinal data. Accommodation was measured using a modification of Nott dynamic retinoscopy technique, and refractive error measurements were obtained using Mohindra retinoscopy. RESULTS: Accommodation was poor, regardless of the refractive error present. The total accommodation produced by the children was related to the refractive error at the time of the test, with the degree of accommodation deficit increasing with the amount of positive refractive error. The longitudinal results showed that although children with Down syndrome did not accommodate accurately, the amount of accommodation elicited did not reflect their maximum amplitude of accommodation. Each child showed a consistent degree of underaccommodation for a given stimulus. Spectacles to correct hypermetropia did not improve the accommodative response. CONCLUSIONS: In children with Down syndrome, underaccommodation is substantial, even when there is no, or a fully corrected, refractive error. The accommodation system of children with Down syndrome may have the physical capacity to respond to a given stimulus, but the neural control of the system has an anomalous set point. Spectacles do not remedy the situation. This has important implications, especially for children in a learning environment, because near vision is consistently out of focus.

Accommodation, Ocular↗

Nearwork and myopia.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Accommodation, Ocular↗