Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10418320

The Gap effect for spatially oriented responses.

Abstract

The gap effect refers to the finding that a temporal gap between fixation point offset and target onset typically results in shorter saccadic latencies than if the fixation point remains on. Recently, this gap effect was found for aimed hand movements as well as saccadic eye movements, but not for simple keypress responses. In order to examine the hypothesis that the hand gap effect occurs for different types of spatially oriented movements, two experiments were conducted. In the first experiment, subjects produced spatially oriented responses to a peripheral target and the target location was known in advance of the targets presentation. This spatially oriented detection task yielded gap effects for both eye and hand responses. In the second experiment, the duration of the temporal gap was varied between 0-400 ms. The duration of the temporal gap had similar effects on the magnitudes of both the eye and hand gap effects, suggesting that a common mechanism may underlie the gap effect for saccadic and manual pointing movements. Overall, the results of the present experiments confirm the finding of a gap effect for spatially oriented hand movements and suggest that this effect may be related to the functioning of the superior colliculus.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Pratt, H Bekkering, R A Abrams, J Adam. 1999. The Gap effect for spatially oriented responses.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-6918(99)00014-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Localization of visual targets during optokinetic eye movements.

We investigated localization of brief visual targets during reflexive eye movements (optokinetic nystagmus). Subjects mislocalized these targets in the direction of the slow eye movement. This error decreased shortly before a saccade and temporarily increased afterwards. The pattern of mislocalization differs markedly from mislocalization during voluntary eye movements in the presence of visual references, but (spatially) resembles mislocalization during voluntary eye movements in darkness. Because neither reflexive eye movements nor voluntary eye movements in darkness have explicit (visual) goals, these data support the view that visual goals support perceptual stability as an important link between pre- and post-saccadic scenes.

Fixation, Ocular↗

Binocular coordination of the eyes during reading.

Saccadic eye movements and fixations are the behavioral means by which we visually sample text during reading. Human oculomotor control is governed by a complex neurophysiological system involving the brain stem, superior colliculus, and several cortical areas. A very widely held belief among researchers investigating primate vision is that the oculomotor system serves to orient the visual axes of both eyes to fixate the same target point in space. It is argued that such precise positioning of the eyes is necessary to place images on corresponding retinal locations, such that on each fixation a single, nondiplopic, visual representation is perceived. Vision works actively through a continual sampling process involving saccades and fixations. Here we report that during normal reading, the eyes do not always fixate the same letter within a word. We also demonstrate that saccadic targeting is yoked and based on a unified cyclopean percept of a whole word since it is unaffected if different word parts are delivered exclusively to each eye via a dichoptic presentation technique. These two findings together suggest that the visual signal from each eye is fused at a very early stage in the visual pathway, even when the fixation disparity is greater than one character (0.29 deg), and that saccade metrics for each eye are computed on the basis of that fused signal.

Fixation, Ocular↗