Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10414556

Genetic variance components analysis for binary phenotypes using generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) and Gibbs sampling.

Abstract

The common complex diseases such as asthma are an important focus of genetic research, and studies based on large numbers of simple pedigrees ascertained from population-based sampling frames are becoming commonplace. Many of the genetic and environmental factors causing these diseases are unknown and there is often a strong residual covariance between relatives even after all known determinants are taken into account. This must be modelled correctly whether scientific interest is focused on fixed effects, as in an association analysis, or on the covariances themselves. Analysis is straightforward for multivariate Normal phenotypes, but difficulties arise with other types of trait. Generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) offer a potentially unifying approach to analysis for many classes of phenotype including multivariate Normal traits, binary traits, and censored survival times. Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods, including Gibbs sampling, provide a convenient framework within which such models may be fitted. In this paper, Bayesian inference Using Gibbs Sampling (a generic Gibbs sampler; BUGS) is used to fit GLMMs for multivariate Normal and binary phenotypes in nuclear families. BUGS is easy to use and readily available. We motivate a suitable model structure for Normal phenotypes and show how the model extends to binary traits. We discuss parameter interpretation and statistical inference and show how to circumvent a number of important theoretical and practical problems that we encountered. Using simulated data we show that model parameters seem consistent and appear unbiased in smaller data sets. We illustrate our methods using data from an ongoing cohort study.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P R Burton, K J Tiller, L C Gurrin, W O Cookson, A W Musk, L J Palmer. 1999. Genetic variance components analysis for binary phenotypes using generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) and Gibbs sampling.. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-2272(1999)17%3A2%3C118%3A%3Aaid-gepi3%3E3.0.co%3B2-v

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Exact sequential tests for single samples of discrete responses using spending functions.

Sequential tests are increasingly used to reduce the expected sample size of trials in medical research. The majority of such methods are based on the assumption of normality for test statistics. In clinical trials yielding a single sample of discrete data, that assumption is often poorly satisfied. In this paper we show how a novel application of the spending function approach of Lan and DeMets can be used together with exact calculation methods to design sequential procedures for a single sample of discrete random variables without the assumption of normality. A special case is that of binomial data and the paper is illustrated by the design of a cytogenetic study which motivated this work.

Binomial Distribution↗

GEE analysis of negatively correlated binary responses: a caution.

The method of generalized estimating equations has become almost standard for analysing longitudinal and other correlated response data. However, we have found that if binary responses have less than binomial variation over clusters, and are modelled using exchangeable correlations, prevailing software implementations may give unreliable results. Bounding the negative correlation away from its theoretical minimum may not always be a satisfactory solution. In such instances, using the independence working correlation structure and robust SEs is a more trustworthy alternative.

Binomial Distribution↗

[Proof of equivalence as a new issue in confirmatory statistics].

A correct confirmatory analysis of studies aiming at demonstration of equivalence requires the use of a class of testing procedures that is still widely unknown among non-specialists and not even mentioned in traditional textbooks on Applied Statistics. The naive approach to equivalence testing, i.e. performing an ordinary two-sided test and inferring equivalence from the absence of a significant difference, is unacceptable since it entails an uncontrolled increase of the risk of false positive conclusions. A technically simple approach to avoiding such fallacies is based on the principle of confidence interval inclusion. However, the latter suffers from the disadvantage of yielding testing procedures that tend to exhibit comparatively poor power properties. For the sake of keeping the numbers of patients or subjects to be recruited for the respective trials as low as possible, application of optimum testing procedures, also for equivalence assessment, has much to recommend it. The rationale of such an optimum test for equivalence is described in some detail for four standard settings frequently encountered in clinical research.

Binomial Distribution↗